ShakyhandsBTCer
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
|
 |
June 14, 2014, 02:45:09 AM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer (OP)
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:30:30 AM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. The main reason for moving to ghash is their simple neat interface and continues payout due to low or 0 varience. |
|
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer (OP)
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:30:56 AM |
|
"AGAINST 51%" GROUP PLEDGE AGAINST BITCOIN CENTRALISATION CURRENT PROBLEMGHASH = CEX + Other Miners = Near 51% SOLUTIONMove out miners to other pools and make them equally fast. THE PLANTo gather as much miner, small home miners to fib farm miners and move out of a near 51% pool(Currently ghash) to another pool same day. The movement in a single day will keep us all away from variance issue. What you need to do?Pledge here with your mining hash power for Sha256D and make a reminder in your mobile the switching date and switch to the other pool that day. Switching day can be decided after we get gathered. Also Add this Signature: [color=blue][b]AGAINST 51% : PLEDGE AGAINST BITCOIN CENTRALISATION. [/b][/color][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=651211.0][color=blue][b]PLEDGE NOW![/b][/color][/url] For the good will of the community & Bitcoin, inviting all to pledge here and join this AGAINST 51% group here to the betterment of all. Also put all your input here. MOVING DAY: JULY 01 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
flound1129
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:36:07 AM
Last edit: June 14, 2014, 11:31:00 AM by flound1129 |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. |
Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
June 14, 2014, 12:56:06 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. |
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
|
flound1129
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:00:56 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue? |
Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:16:58 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue? Nope because it's the developers fault not mine. |
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
|
flound1129
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:24:13 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue? Nope because it's the developers fault not mine. Good to know where your priorities lie. |
Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
June 14, 2014, 01:34:54 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. But the greed of miners enabling a 51% attack for 0.05% higher profits is not an issue? Nope because it's the developers fault not mine. Good to know where your priorities lie. why should I give a fuck? the developers obviously don't. (albeit one) |
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
ShakyhandsBTCer
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:42:13 PM |
|
GHASH.IO vs ELIGIUS.ST
Which pool is more profitable. Its seems GHASH.IO more appealing. What you say?
Ghash is effectively more profitable. They both merge mine namecoins but ghash mines dvc and ixc as well. They are both worth basically nothing but that little bit does make a difference. Does it? A new template has to be generated every time DVC and IXC block changes. If this increases your stale rate by even 0.1% it's a net loss. my stale rate isn't even .00001% so it's not an issue. Already made money off my ixc that I mine. If the other pool operators weren't so greedy this wouldn't be an issue. The DVC and IXC coins are basically lottery tickets that cost nothing. In theory they could explode in value in the future and the miners at ghash would profit, if they do not then the miners could simply sell the coins on an exchange and still make something off of the coins. |
|
|
|
|
|
joshraban76
|
|
June 14, 2014, 04:45:43 PM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
|
|
|
|
alexrossi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1742
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 09:36:43 PM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. |
|
|
|
ShakyhandsBTCer
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:39:17 PM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
It would be the opposite, ghash is profitable because of cex.io (they are the ones that sell the GHs) |
|
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2014, 09:05:00 PM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. |
|
|
|
|
GaryL
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:55:39 AM |
|
Stop using GHASH.IO ASAP, before everyone is injured.
|
|
|
|
|
ShakyhandsBTCer
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
It's Money 2.0| It’s gold for nerds | It's Bitcoin
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:09:01 AM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. Since the GH/s price is measured in bitcoin it would likely not be affected by the price of bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
|
flound1129
|
|
June 16, 2014, 08:29:42 AM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. Since the GH/s price is measured in bitcoin it would likely not be affected by the price of bitcoin Many people base their purchasing calculations on the BTC/fiat exchange rate. |
Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 08:53:57 AM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. Since the GH/s price is measured in bitcoin it would likely not be affected by the price of bitcoin Many people base their purchasing calculations on the BTC/fiat exchange rate. As far as when they are getting the BTC from fiat else, it should be ROI from miner or Profit from trading. |
|
|
|
|
|
flound1129
|
|
June 16, 2014, 10:59:42 AM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. Since the GH/s price is measured in bitcoin it would likely not be affected by the price of bitcoin Many people base their purchasing calculations on the BTC/fiat exchange rate. As far as when they are getting the BTC from fiat else, it should be ROI from miner or Profit from trading. should != do  |
Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
|
|
|
|
allcoinminer (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 11:07:30 AM |
|
Can't I say cex.io is profitable because GHash is profitable. right ?
Yep, but this month some strange things have raised GHS price (hard market manipulation), and basically who have bought GHS two/three weeks ago can exit now with btc minted + profit. Expecting lower GH price due to lower btc price now. Since the GH/s price is measured in bitcoin it would likely not be affected by the price of bitcoin Many people base their purchasing calculations on the BTC/fiat exchange rate. As far as when they are getting the BTC from fiat else, it should be ROI from miner or Profit from trading. should != do ! |
|
|
|
|
|
