here's a small suggestion:
is it right to add a small section to this thread of who manage that specific campaign?
I have nothing against it. What do you think ralle14?
[..]
Please read OP.
[...]
They are literally giving a suggestion to improve the OP. That is very relevant to this topic and allowed by local rules.
Sorry for interjecting into your conversation, but let me take a look at how
Ratimov edit the table in the Russian local.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333839.msg62863050#msg62863050Here is the number of weeks and the name of the manager who is running the subscription campaign. You can probably borrow this if Ratimov doesn't mind. I'm not saying that your table is bad, but I just want it to be more convenient for users to choose a subscription table.
If there is already enough space for additional info, the campaign start date would be useful information. The long-term nature of the campaign is one of the most important parameters that affect the reliability and quality of the service. Definitely important info for everyone who uses this thread to find out about the signature campaign.
Take a look at my link above. The campaign's longevity is also present and arranged from top to bottom. The number of weeks is also indicated. New campaigns are added at the bottom, which allows you to understand which campaigns are the most recent.