Bitcoin Forum
November 17, 2017, 08:00:09 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 347 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander  (Read 505798 times)
ReRunRod
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 11:03:28 PM
 #761

When is POS?
Staking since May 31st.

TY!
1510948809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510948809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510948809
Reply with quote  #2

1510948809
Report to moderator
1510948809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510948809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510948809
Reply with quote  #2

1510948809
Report to moderator
Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1510948809
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510948809

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510948809
Reply with quote  #2

1510948809
Report to moderator
xx63245613
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:02:38 AM
 #762

this would be a good coin,i will in

                  ▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄▄▄
              ▄▄█∞══$&P▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▄▄▄
           ▄██⌐^"'               "═▄═,▀▀▄
       ▄▀▄█▀                        `ⁿ▀▄\▀▄
     ▄▄²█▀                              ▀▀▄▀
    █▀▄█                                   ██▄
   █▄▀╛       ▄███▄  ███████▀ ██  ▐█▌       ▄█▄
  ▐▌,▀       ██▌ ▐██    ██    ██  ██         █▌█
  █╓-        ██▌ ▐█▀    ██    ██ ▐█▌         ▐▐ █
 ▐█▌         ██▌        ██    ██ ██           ▌⌐▌▌
 U█           ███       ██    ████▌           ▐▌▌▐
╟▐▐            ▀██      ██    ████▌            █▌█
█▐▐▌             ██▄    ██    ██▀██            ██
▐▐ ▀             ▐██    ██    ██ ██▌          ,█▌
 ▀▄▌▌        ▄█  ▐██    ██    ██ ▐██         ,▀█
  ▀▓ ⌐       ██▄ ▐██    ██    ██  ██▌       ╓`▀▌
   ╙█▀        ▀███▀     ██    ██   ██      ƒ▄▀█
     ██▄                                  █▀ █
      ▀▀█▄                              ▄█ ▄▀
       ╙▄▀▄▀π,                       ,▄█▀▀▀
         '═▌▄"▄"═             ,.∞═$██▀
             ▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀▀
                    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
STACK









1
●● TelegramTwitter ●●
Facebook ●●● Discord





Collegestudent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490

The blockchain is the future


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:32:53 AM
 #763

ETA on anon?
ebliever
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 02:02:28 AM
 #764

I'll be reading the whitepaper soon, but does anyone have any comments on how it compares to other approaches? A list of pros/cons/uncertainties would be helpful.

Luke 12:15-21

Ephesians 2:8-9
Viecoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 653


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 03:43:42 AM
 #765

Thank you for the paper. At least you released something. I hope it works out. Keep the faith.
hoshigakiii
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 07:59:37 AM
 #766

Nice buy walls on bittrex, without sell walls.
bombasti
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 08:48:12 AM
 #767

what's up dev team, how things going? everybody's fine?
hashnine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 09:45:28 AM
 #768

dumbass dumper.

Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
litebtc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 10:53:12 AM
 #769

You guys have my support...soon CRY will see 400k sats trading range... Grin
LimLims
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 12:26:25 PM
 #770

From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way.
Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power.
So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins?

As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design


An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem.



                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄███▀
 ▀███▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█████▀
  ▀██████▄▄█▀                ▄▄███████▀
   ▐█████████▄           ▄▄███████████
     ▀█████████▄▄      ▄█████████████
       ▀██████████    ███████████████
        ▐▀█████████  █████████████▀ ▐▌
        ▐▌ ▀▀██████ ▐███████████▀   ▐▌
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█████████▀     ▐▌
         █        ▀  ██████         █
         ▐█          ▐█████▄       █▌
          ▀█▄         ▀██████▄   ▄█▀
            ▀█▄         ▀█████▌▄█▀
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀
                ▀▀████████▀▀
T
.ANGEL TOKEN.
[]

                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄█▀█▀
 ▀█▀█▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█  ▄█▀
  ▀█  ▀▀█▄▄█▀                ▄▄██░   █▀
   ▐▄▄  ░░░▀█▄           ▄▄█▀▀░░░   ▄█
     ▀█▄ ░░░▒▒█▄▄      ▄██▒▒▒▒▒░    █
       ▀▄▄ ░░▒▒▒▓█    ██▒▒▒▒▒▒░   ▄▄█
        ▐▀█▄░░▒▒▓██  █▓▒▒▒▒▒▒░  ▄█▀ ▐▌
        ▐▌ ▀▀█▒▓███░▐█▓▒▒▒▒░░ ▄█▀   ▐▌
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█▓▓▒▒▄▄▄█▀     ▐▌
         █        ▀  █▓█▀▀█         █
         ▐█          ▐▄▓░ █▄       █▌
          ▀█▄         ▀█▒░ ▀█▄   ▄█▀
            ▀█▄         ▀█▄▄▄█▌▄█▀
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀
                 ▀▀████████▀▀
loges
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 12:30:51 PM
 #771

From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way.
Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power.
So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins?

As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design


An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem.
Monero troll. Go away.

LimLims
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 12:36:57 PM
 #772

From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way.
Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power.
So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins?

As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design


An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem.
Monero troll. Go away.

Your troll detector needs calibration. I'm offering a genuine criticism of the implementation. How about responding to the content of my criticism, instead of a four word dismissal that amounts to baseless ad-hominem?



                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄███▀
 ▀███▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█████▀
  ▀██████▄▄█▀                ▄▄███████▀
   ▐█████████▄           ▄▄███████████
     ▀█████████▄▄      ▄█████████████
       ▀██████████    ███████████████
        ▐▀█████████  █████████████▀ ▐▌
        ▐▌ ▀▀██████ ▐███████████▀   ▐▌
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█████████▀     ▐▌
         █        ▀  ██████         █
         ▐█          ▐█████▄       █▌
          ▀█▄         ▀██████▄   ▄█▀
            ▀█▄         ▀█████▌▄█▀
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀
                ▀▀████████▀▀
T
.ANGEL TOKEN.
[]

                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄█▀█▀
 ▀█▀█▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█  ▄█▀
  ▀█  ▀▀█▄▄█▀                ▄▄██░   █▀
   ▐▄▄  ░░░▀█▄           ▄▄█▀▀░░░   ▄█
     ▀█▄ ░░░▒▒█▄▄      ▄██▒▒▒▒▒░    █
       ▀▄▄ ░░▒▒▒▓█    ██▒▒▒▒▒▒░   ▄▄█
        ▐▀█▄░░▒▒▓██  █▓▒▒▒▒▒▒░  ▄█▀ ▐▌
        ▐▌ ▀▀█▒▓███░▐█▓▒▒▒▒░░ ▄█▀   ▐▌
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█▓▓▒▒▄▄▄█▀     ▐▌
         █        ▀  █▓█▀▀█         █
         ▐█          ▐▄▓░ █▄       █▌
          ▀█▄         ▀█▒░ ▀█▄   ▄█▀
            ▀█▄         ▀█▄▄▄█▌▄█▀
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀
                 ▀▀████████▀▀
loges
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:08:57 PM
 #773

No. Just stop trolling. That will be fine.

GTO73
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:01:23 PM
 #774

Why the prize is so low Huh
Kruemmelmonster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 338


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
 #775

Why the prize is so low Huh

a pump is always followed by a dump ...
arguelles84
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:13:25 PM
 #776

Indeed, a pump followed by a panic buy. Look at the top 10 rich list for this coin, they own 64%.
Wasda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504

Smile if you're not wearing any underwear


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:16:13 PM
 #777

Indeed, a pump followed by a panic buy. Look at the top 10 rich list for this coin, they own 64%.

most of those top 5 are probably miner pool and exchanges

CRY Article: http://www.coinssource.com/cryptcoin-end-transaction-fees/

.
.
.
▬◇
▬◇▬◆
▬◇▬◇▬◆
.
.







███
███░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████
██░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░██░░░
██░░░░█░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
██████░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░░░░░░░██████
██░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░██
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░█░░░░██
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░███
███
.
.
.
◇▬
◆▬◇▬
◆▬◇▬◇▬
.
.
q327K091
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:32:16 PM
 #778

bought 13 CRYPT coins for 1.70$, and 1.70$ I got from free coins obtained online (wanted to record it somewhere) maybe I just bought, well.. got for free, a car  Cool (in the future)

new upcoming awesome coin

the Gulden Coin: GKWHEPx3rQyPnbgQUSHu8gtgoRCgpqed1j
Kruemmelmonster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 338


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 04:43:22 PM
 #779

nice article!
i hope my buy order at 2000 satoshi get filled Cheesy
Vlizzjeffrey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 05:48:08 PM
 #780

should be filled now

[
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 ... 347 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!