|
Viecoin
|
 |
June 07, 2014, 03:43:42 AM |
|
Thank you for the paper. At least you released something. I hope it works out. Keep the faith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
hoshigakiii
|
|
June 07, 2014, 07:59:37 AM |
|
Nice buy walls on bittrex, without sell walls.
|
|
|
|
|
bombasti
Member
 Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
June 07, 2014, 08:48:12 AM |
|
what's up dev team, how things going? everybody's fine?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hashnine
|
|
June 07, 2014, 09:45:28 AM |
|
dumbass dumper.
|
Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
|
|
|
litebtc
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:53:12 AM |
|
You guys have my support...soon CRY will see 400k sats trading range...  |
|
|
|
|
|
LimLims
|
|
June 07, 2014, 12:26:25 PM |
|
From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way. Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power. So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins? As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem. |
|
|
|
loges
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
|
|
June 07, 2014, 12:30:51 PM |
|
From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way. Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power. So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins? As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem. Monero troll. Go away. |
|
|
|
|
|
LimLims
|
|
June 07, 2014, 12:36:57 PM |
|
From my reading of the whitepaper, it appears the recipient wallet must be online (i.e. running the wallet software) in order to receive coins anonymously. If so, this isn't a workable anonymity solution. Can the dev please clarify?
In order for the transaction to take place, in this initial draft, the wallet has to come online and give "directions" to the sender regarding the destination addresses. The "trigger message" will be valid for some time before it times out. I am testing various scenarios on how to make it work with the best possible (to my knowledge) way. Now, whether it's workable or not, I guess one must weight the pros and cons. As another developer said (and he's right all the way): there are no true passwords, nor true encryption. Everything can be broken with enough computational power. So I make myself this question: who do I trust to deliver my coins? As I said previously, it's a matter of preference. Also, I'm sure that more ideas will come from this, as there's always room for improvement to every design An implementation where the recipient wallet needs to be online is basically useless in practice. For all the self-congratulatory language in the whitepaper and condescending references to other anon solutions, you don't even realise that you're not solving the same problem. Monero troll. Go away. Your troll detector needs calibration. I'm offering a genuine criticism of the implementation. How about responding to the content of my criticism, instead of a four word dismissal that amounts to baseless ad-hominem? |
|
|
|
loges
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
|
|
June 07, 2014, 01:08:57 PM |
|
No. Just stop trolling. That will be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GTO73
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:01:23 PM |
|
Why the prize is so low  |
|
|
|
|
|
Kruemmelmonster
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:04:24 PM |
|
Why the prize is so low a pump is always followed by a dump ... |
|
|
|
|
|
arguelles84
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:13:25 PM |
|
Indeed, a pump followed by a panic buy. Look at the top 10 rich list for this coin, they own 64%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:32:16 PM |
|
bought 13 CRYPT coins for 1.70$, and 1.70$ I got from free coins obtained online (wanted to record it somewhere) maybe I just bought, well.. got for free, a car  (in the future) |
|
|
|
|
|
Kruemmelmonster
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:43:22 PM |
|
nice article! i hope my buy order at 2000 satoshi get filled  |
|
|
|
|
|
Vlizzjeffrey
|
|
June 07, 2014, 05:48:08 PM |
|
should be filled now
|
|
|
|
Darkmagus
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Yolo!
|
|
June 07, 2014, 05:53:00 PM |
|
Coin with so much potential....and so cheap right now... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruemmelmonster
|
|
June 07, 2014, 07:21:43 PM |
|
 There will be haters, doubters, non-believers, and then there will be you, proving them wrong. BUY low and sell HIGH that's my motto! I fight for what I believe in. I am a mercenary, and I believe in CRY! The One and Truly 100% anonymous coin of the future!Heh.. It's fontas... do you mean fontas ... the ninja trader? |
|
|
|
|
Waldozaur12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 07, 2014, 07:51:24 PM |
|
400k sat is really good price 4 this coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
