[ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon

[marseille]

Feedback welcome: http://www.super-coin.net/SuperCoin-Anon-Whitepaper-FAQ.pdf
We will develop it soon with more content.

Looks nice. If the diagrams we can make better will be great.

[1714803496]

1714803496

[supercointeam]

Feedback welcome: http://www.super-coin.net/SuperCoin-Anon-Whitepaper-FAQ.pdf
We will develop it soon with more content.

Looks nice. If the diagrams we can make better will be great.

Thank you for the feedback.

[btcsup]

SUPER to da MOON!

[sosxc]

Some Feedback:

1) Why bother with Phase 1?    I think what people want is fully decentralized, trustless anonymous coin.   The first coin to do it will be very popular.  Implementing phase 1 seems to me like it may simply divert a lot of time and energy from achieving phase 2.  Not just in terms of initial development but also building out the infrastructure, bug fixes, documentation and support, etc, etc.  So if phase 2 is achievable, why not just announce that is the roadmap/goal/plan and go for it?    Requiring a trusted third party (phase 1) just does not interest me and probably many others.

2) The document does not seem detailed enough for any third party security researcher to fully grasp the workings and audit the logic.  I don't believe any coin will reach full value/potential until that hurdle is cleared.

3) It is unclear if mixing will be a) the only possible way to send, b) the default way to send,  c) opt-in way to send.   My recommendation for an anonymous coin would be (a).  If it is known that everyone is mixing, then mixed transactions do not stand out or look suspicious.  There is much more noise, and correspondingly less signal to follow than in an opt-in scenario.  (a) would also mean the highest level of fungibility, which is generally considered a useful property of a currency.

4) I did not see defined how a node (phase 2) would know which of its peers can be used for mixing.

[supercointeam]

Some Feedback:

1) Why bother with Phase 1?    I think what people want is fully decentralized, trustless anonymous coin.   The first coin to do it will be very popular.  Implementing phase 1 seems to me like it may simply divert a lot of time and energy from achieving phase 2.  Not just in terms of initial development but also building out the infrastructure, bug fixes, documentation and support, etc, etc.  So if phase 2 is achievable, why not just announce that is the roadmap/goal/plan and go for it?    Requiring a trusted third party (phase 1) just does not interest me and probably many others.

2) The document does not seem detailed enough for any third party security researcher to fully grasp the workings and audit the logic.  I don't believe any coin will reach full value/potential until that hurdle is cleared.

3) It is unclear if mixing will be a) the only possible way to send, b) the default way to send,  c) opt-in way to send.   My recommendation for an anonymous coin would be (a).  If it is known that everyone is mixing, then mixed transactions do not stand out or look suspicious.  There is much more noise, and correspondingly less signal to follow than in an opt-in scenario.  (a) would also mean the highest level of fungibility, which is generally considered a useful property of a currency.

4) I did not see defined how a node (phase 2) would know which of its peers can be used for mixing.

Thanks for the feedback.  At the next version of the document will include answers for these.

[marseille]

Some Feedback:

1) Why bother with Phase 1?    I think what people want is fully decentralized, trustless anonymous coin.   The first coin to do it will be very popular.  Implementing phase 1 seems to me like it may simply divert a lot of time and energy from achieving phase 2.  Not just in terms of initial development but also building out the infrastructure, bug fixes, documentation and support, etc, etc.  So if phase 2 is achievable, why not just announce that is the roadmap/goal/plan and go for it?    Requiring a trusted third party (phase 1) just does not interest me and probably many others.

2) The document does not seem detailed enough for any third party security researcher to fully grasp the workings and audit the logic.  I don't believe any coin will reach full value/potential until that hurdle is cleared.

3) It is unclear if mixing will be a) the only possible way to send, b) the default way to send,  c) opt-in way to send.   My recommendation for an anonymous coin would be (a).  If it is known that everyone is mixing, then mixed transactions do not stand out or look suspicious.  There is much more noise, and correspondingly less signal to follow than in an opt-in scenario.  (a) would also mean the highest level of fungibility, which is generally considered a useful property of a currency.

4) I did not see defined how a node (phase 2) would know which of its peers can be used for mixing.

If you read dev's previous posts, all the answers are there. For example:

3) It is unclear if mixing will be a) the only possible way to send, b) the default way to send,  c) opt-in way to send.

if you look at the client (anon version), or dev's posts, there is a checkbox for anonymous send in the "send" tab, where you check if you want to send anonymous. If you don't check, it will be normal send. Very simple.

[provenceday]

soon for block halve now

[bitbd83]

Now you can trade SUPER at Coins-E :
https://www.coins-e.com/exchange/SUPER_BTC/?ref=6425523773243392

[supercointeam]

Now you can trade SUPER at Coins-E :
https://www.coins-e.com/exchange/SUPER_BTC/?ref=6425523773243392

Site returns 403 to me

[supercointeam]

soon for block halve now

>> nHeight = 83100, nPoWHeight = 19161

Last 39 blocks, then we will halve.

[testadimerlo]

Hi to all! If cloackcoin is there, it means that we can do better and better and better. I put my ass on this coin, no doubt! good job dev, keep working in this way!!

[supercointeam]

Hi to all! If cloackcoin is there, it means that we can do better and better and better. I put my ass on this coin, no doubt! good job dev, keep working in this way!!

Thank you. We aim to be securest and fastest.

[supercointeam]

Super was most mined crypto recent hour at wafflepool, i hope this is ending today after the first halve.

[mistress]

So will the first halve today? I was thinking was yesterday, maybe am I wrong? Anyway, that's good

[supercointeam]

So will the first halve today? I was thinking was yesterday, maybe am I wrong? Anyway, that's good

Yes, It's about to happen. (Last 23 PoW blocks before halve)  Because multipools sudden increase and drop in supernetwork, block finding was not so effective (miners can't connect the network). For this reason it was little late.

[supercointeam]

Supercoin Version 1.2 is a mandatory upgrade,
Do not lose any SUPER coin! Upgrade now.

Download V.1.2: http://www.super-coin.net/SuperCoin12.zip
Download2 V.1.2: https://mega.co.nz/#!EoJAURQZ!Mn-vb1gXBNbdAQzYsqUKIcjq8PXGRsRu15_-L0riQFo

Mac download 1.2: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ifkn9y2rnfeppep/SuperCoin-Qt-MacOSX-v1.2.zip

updated source: https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin

[provenceday]

it seems multipool start dump their mined coin now.

their last chance to dump now.

[saberu]

how to build QT wallet from source? I just get error.

post your errors.

For Linux.

/home/saberu/supercoin/Makefile
Unable to generate makefile for: SuperCoin-qt.pro

I fixed that by running with sudo but now still another problem.  When I try and run make-

cd /home/saberu/supercoin/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make OPT="-fpermissive -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
/bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/saberu/supercoin/src/leveldb'
Makefile:18: build_config.mk: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build_config.mk'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/saberu/supercoin/src/leveldb'
make: *** [/home/saberu/supercoin/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2

Ok I fixed that by using 777 permissions on all the src files. Ill see if compiles

[testadimerlo]

it seems multipool start dump their mined coin now.

their last chance to dump now.

strange, there is not buy support at the moment. I ve bought other 10.000 super at 5000 sat before but for today I cannot do more

[jdebunt]

New SuperCoin article :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/supercoin-mandatory-update-block-reward-halving-anon-whitepaper

Please share