Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2017, 04:23:06 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Did you see the new thread?
Yes https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=875651.0
No

Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 ... 501 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon  (Read 465648 times)
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:45:04 PM
 #1901

1 ask mintpal add supercoin directly on mintpal

send email to support@mintpal.com

such as


hi

mintpal


Please add Another Anon coin- supercoin directly on mintpal, they have some big volume on bittrex.

if you add it on mintpal, i do believe that's will bring big volume on mintpal.

Because so far only Dark XC and Supercoin has worked mixer and Anon features.

Please add it directly, thanks


Supercoin Ann post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.0

Anon features:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.msg7244842#msg7244842

Big volume on bittrex:  https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-SUPER

Add it Please!

2 Ask biggest Chinese altcoin exchange platform add supercoin on Bter!

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

still works. let's do something good for community.

Send Emails guys, more exchanges can prevent multipool's big dump.
1511022186
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511022186

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511022186
Reply with quote  #2

1511022186
Report to moderator
A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511022186
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511022186

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511022186
Reply with quote  #2

1511022186
Report to moderator
1511022186
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511022186

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511022186
Reply with quote  #2

1511022186
Report to moderator
1511022186
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511022186

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511022186
Reply with quote  #2

1511022186
Report to moderator
chedigital
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141

WOW SUCH COIN


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:45:10 PM
 #1902

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote
- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()


These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
doch
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:45:54 PM
 #1903

if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin

I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea:

My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.

jakiman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


jakiman is back!


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:46:02 PM
 #1904

we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out

dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online.

he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet.

If the dev is in Asia, it's still early morning there. (6:40am)
He released the anon wallet before going to sleep AFAICS.

He'll soon wake up to this exciting thread I assume. Tongue

You can follow me on Twitter for the latest PIVX news & updates: https://twitter.com/jakimanboy
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:46:11 PM
 #1905

Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release

Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features

Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node
XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later.
Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan
Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet.

Dark coin Current total supply   is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$
XC   coin  Current total supply  is 5.5 Million, the Price is  130K Satoshi/0.84$
Vericoin Current total supply    is  26 Million, the Price is   15K Satoshi/0.1$
Supercoin Current total supply is  10 Million, the Price is   3K?Huh/0.018$???

personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin

so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi
if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.


now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi.

so what are we waiting for???. Grin



+1

thank you for your support!
neilh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:48:57 PM
 #1906

MAX_MONEY in main.h is normal and allows for pos minting?

Okay they maybe forgot to change in the main.h file but the
code below in the bitcoinrpc.cpp busoni posted


Line 99

Super:
Code:
99    if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp#L99

Honor:
Code:
99 if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)

Why change MAX_MONEY and hardcode when it's set
in the main.h file?

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38




Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o
Mrjitter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:49:05 PM
 #1907

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

   
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 08:20:32 PM
Reply with quote  #1
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote
- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

POLONIEX are retarded , its obvious and clear.

should have waited several confirmations of expert developers before to launch the FUD News



cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106



View Profile WWW
June 14, 2014, 10:50:11 PM
 #1908

if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin

I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea:

My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.

sense of humor. lol

now POLO are frustrated with all complaints.

they are totally in a big mess.

BTC12.COM 
Elastic.pw Elastic Network: The Decentralized Supercomputer 
ANNOUNCEMENT THREAD | JOIN THE SLACK
Abinito
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:50:25 PM
 #1909

Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release

Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features

Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node
XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later.
Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan
Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet.

Dark coin Current total supply   is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$
XC   coin  Current total supply  is 5.5 Million, the Price is  130K Satoshi/0.84$
Vericoin Current total supply    is  26 Million, the Price is   15K Satoshi/0.1$
Supercoin Current total supply is  10 Million, the Price is   3K?Huh/0.018$???

personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin


now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi.

so what are we waiting for???. Grin



+1

thank you for your support!

   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM

diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?


yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry

Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
sussex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:50:55 PM
 #1910

MAX_MONEY in main.h is normal and allows for pos minting?

Okay they maybe forgot to change in the main.h file but the
code below in the bitcoinrpc.cpp busoni posted


Line 99

Super:
Code:
99    if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp#L99

Honor:
Code:
99 if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)

Why change MAX_MONEY and hardcode when it's set
in the main.h file?

https://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L38




Did I say I'm not listing it because it was cloned?

jakiman said that the value may have been leftover from the old SUPER coin. I am saying that is not very likely, because this coin was cloned from Honorcoin, not the old SUPER coin. See bitcoinrpc.cpp of Honorcoin and (new) SuperCoin side by side: http://www.diffchecker.com/j8xl540o

This gets better and better.  Grin
supercoindev
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:51:05 PM
 #1911

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Grin

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Quote
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus Grin

Supercoin - 1st true peer-to-peer decentralized trustless anonymous wallet using multisig technologies!
Abinito
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:51:14 PM
 #1912

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

   
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 08:20:32 PM
Reply with quote  #1
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post:

Quote
- Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.

And these parts of the source code:

Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)

Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.

We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.

We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.

Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
Abinito
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:52:14 PM
 #1913

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Grin

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Quote
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus Grin

   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM
diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry

Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
maryvale
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:54:55 PM
 #1914

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Grin

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Quote
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus Grin

Yes, and also you can set the upper limit to be 10000000000000000000 trillion, but only generate 15 millions, is there a problem there? someone is completely idiot.

If you want to know how many coins will be generated, look at the functions generating them, not the limit. Idiot!
bitrap
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:55:29 PM
 #1915

Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.
chedigital
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141

WOW SUCH COIN


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:56:10 PM
 #1916

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Grin

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Quote
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus Grin

+1

Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code.


GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106



View Profile WWW
June 14, 2014, 10:56:49 PM
 #1917

Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.

JUST IGNORE this moron

BTC12.COM 
Elastic.pw Elastic Network: The Decentralized Supercomputer 
ANNOUNCEMENT THREAD | JOIN THE SLACK
originalchilli
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:59:40 PM
 #1918

already bounced back up to 4000 on bittrex, grabbed me some cheap super, thanks!

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER -  @originalchilli
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 11:00:55 PM
 #1919

Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old?

The max coin limits the maximum coin,
but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all.

The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:

- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!
Abinito
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 11:01:07 PM
 #1920

Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin. Here is why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351

lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them  Grin

Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation:

Quote
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward()
- GetProofOfStakeReward()
and
- GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()

These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! Grin

This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded.

I can't believe this, it's like a circus Grin

+1

Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code.



   
Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin
Today at 10:22:21 PM
Reply with quote  #84
Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM
diversion tactics won't work guys  Roll Eyes

classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you.
Oh internet your so creative ahahha
Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?

yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol

I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here.

but he's not.. what you just said is not true.
for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them.
so how can he be wrong on that point ?
and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it.
It's been explained..
so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth.
And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy.
And that IS the truth.

if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner..
and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth .
Suck it up..
for the good of our scene please lol
Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad  Angry

Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
Pages: « 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 ... 501 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!