Regarding the financing of the foundation with a block tax, I basically agree, but IMHO should be discussed better.
"Regarding the financing of the foundation with a block tax, I basically agree, but IMHO should be discussed better." > I think you meant the block tax should be discussed later.
Ehmmm. No, I did not mean that. Sorry to have been unclear.
I mean that right now is the time to think and discuss the characteristics
and function that must have the wallet, before it is released.
Before is too late.
Let me explain:
As with any project, it is much easier to add or change something when
it is still in the design phase, rather than adding something extraneous
when it has already been launched and distributed.
In this case, this mean when the new coin's blockchain has already been
launched and is in circulation, and users have _entrusted their money_ to the wallet.
Intervening later, it is certainly possible, but it is risky and complicated.
IMHO, I do not see now reason to be rushed. So why not talk about it now?
Without a secure method to fund long-term technical management of coin, imho I do not
see a future that is worth to follow, unless you want a disposable currency, valid only for
very short-term speculation.
If you'll pardon the play on words, what do we want a lasting currency or a coin that will
last only one season?
They are both valid choices, depending on your tastes and how you want to use, just that at least
we are told before.
The foundation with the announcement a few days ago, imho seems directed on the right path,
assuming a block tax.
I just wanted to give them a way to better explain what will be, and give to everyone the possibility
to discuss and improve it by providing a different point of view.
There are also a couple of other things that I would suggest as a simple user,
but I really in danger of becoming too boring.
