|
Mountaingoat
|
 |
July 12, 2014, 09:41:36 PM |
|
only thing make me mad is this coin is still under 0.01. although i am trying my best pretending to be very fucking patient  sorry. It has no reason not to go up, so we all just have to wait. How many XC do you have atm? |
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:44:15 PM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. |
|
|
|
|
|
SpringfieldM1A
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:45:03 PM |
|
Rumour has it DrasticRaven is building a GUI wallet |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:47:40 PM |
|
Rumour has it DrasticRaven is designing a GUI wallet That's a rumor, all I'm sayin.... |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoPromotions
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:50:54 PM |
|
This coin will take it's place at the head of the table soon enough. Kudos to the fabulous development team!  |
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:51:30 PM
Last edit: July 12, 2014, 10:03:50 PM by KimmyF |
|
Thank you for your reply. It still gives me error with my Internal IP address and the External one that you can find in http://ipchicken.com/Any suggestion? Check your PM .... |
|
|
|
|
takramltc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:44:50 PM |
|
I'd like to download and install the wallet but would like to see checksums at a minimum published by Dan first. It's industry best practice to publish checksum / PGP sign off on wallet downloads, see Bitcoin Core: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc@TEKA @SYNECHIST Please could you address btcsql concern - I agree with him its standard practice and nearly all software uses checksum validation as a minimum (Nearly all Microsoft MSDN downloads use it). It would definitely be in line with "secure private transactions" I understand Dan is probably busy coding - and perhaps will be able to address this concern when he has some time. I would hate that FUD is spread about this, when its something easy to resolve. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
btcsql
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:02:44 PM |
|
I am offering a 100 XC bounty (Bounty 1) for Dan's PGP signed checksums of all currently available wallet downloads.
Bounty 1 will be paid on mainnet using distmix.
There will be another 100 XC bounty (Bounty 2) for anyone who can successfully discover the sending address for Bounty 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:10:28 PM |
|
I'd like to download and install the wallet but would like to see checksums at a minimum published by Dan first. It's industry best practice to publish checksum / PGP sign off on wallet downloads, see Bitcoin Core: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc@TEKA @SYNECHIST Please could you address btcsql concern - I agree with him its standard practice and nearly all software uses checksum validation as a minimum (Nearly all Microsoft MSDN downloads use it). It would definitely be in line with "secure private transactions" I understand Dan is probably busy coding - and perhaps will be able to address this concern when he has some time.I would hate that FUD is spread about this, when its something easy to resolve. Thanks. You hit the nail on the head. Also I seriously don't think this as much of a big deal as problems that other coins have. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:14:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoinsDude
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:22:52 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:25:00 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. |
|
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:29:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:30:22 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!). Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is. Just my 0.2 XC. |
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:31:52 PM |
|
so this is the checksum thing he s been asking? Can we depart for moon now ? |
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:33:07 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!). Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is. Just my 0.2 XC. +1 - love the idea as well FWIW |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:34:27 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!). Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is. Just my 0.2 XC. +1 - love the idea as well FWIW Hmm... I'm wondering if we could do XSEND and the hover over for info. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:46:29 PM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. Why is that funny? I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Driv3n
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:53:12 PM |
|
I'm a little torn, XCend is catchy... but something simple like enable private transaction is good too and won't lead to any confusion if and when things go more mainstream. Mountaingoat - Cyberhacker probably has a lot of XC and may not want to disclose how much... which is probably smart |
|
|
|
|
|
