policymaker
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
 |
July 12, 2014, 11:31:52 PM |
|
so this is the checksum thing he s been asking? Can we depart for moon now ? |
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:33:07 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!). Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is. Just my 0.2 XC. +1 - love the idea as well FWIW |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:34:27 PM |
|
IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.
New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...
Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas. Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!). Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is. Just my 0.2 XC. +1 - love the idea as well FWIW Hmm... I'm wondering if we could do XSEND and the hover over for info. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:46:29 PM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. Why is that funny? I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Driv3n
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:53:12 PM |
|
I'm a little torn, XCend is catchy... but something simple like enable private transaction is good too and won't lead to any confusion if and when things go more mainstream. Mountaingoat - Cyberhacker probably has a lot of XC and may not want to disclose how much... which is probably smart  |
|
|
|
|
|
btcsql
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:54:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:54:30 PM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. Why is that funny? I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford. He, i know people that are sure you can buy a great car with that amount 6 months from now. Wait some more while you think about what you could do with 267 BTC you stored in 2011. There are not so many coins going around & this is a POS coin |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:04:19 AM |
|
That should be more than adequate enough for verification. |
|
|
|
|
|
btcsql
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:07:13 AM |
|
That should be more than adequate enough for verification. There is nothing of value to me in that file you uploaded: https://i.imgur.com/KW5c0Tb.pngAgain, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:14:48 AM |
|
Hi I do the package distribution for XC That is a GPG signature using atcsecure's GPG signature; it works fine. I tested it myself barely minutes ago. You need to verify it against ATC's GPG sig which is available here: http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xA133B0461356792AI have countersigned ATC's key myself (n00bsys0p AT xc-official.com) to verify that it is indeed his. His fingerprint is: 5974 678C FC1A A990 2C4C 2704 A133 B046 1356 792A If you need help verifying the download file against it please let me know. |
|
|
|
|
|
btcsql
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:17:46 AM |
|
Hi I do the package distribution for XC That is a GPG signature using atcsecure's GPG signature; it works fine. I tested it myself barely minutes ago. You need to verify it against ATC's GPG sig which is available here: http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xA133B0461356792AI have countersigned ATC's key myself (n00bsys0p AT xc-official.com) to verify that it is indeed his. His fingerprint is: 5974 678C FC1A A990 2C4C 2704 A133 B046 1356 792A If you need help verifying the download file against it please let me know. I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. |
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:29:21 AM |
|
I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. |
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:34:30 AM |
|
nice and clean
|
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:38:05 AM |
|
I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. Perhaps the team might as well start delivering fresh, hot coffee door to door, I know that would reassure a lot of holders for the work being done here. Again, excellent work, I need to buy mroe XC, yet again. |
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:41:49 AM |
|
I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. Perhaps the team might as well start delivering fresh, hot coffee door to door, I know that would reassure a lot of holders for the work being done here. Again, excellent work, I need to buy mroe XC, yet again. just did, but only got 0.061148XC because of some polo giveaway |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
July 13, 2014, 01:17:17 AM |
|
I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. btcsql, Dan is busy trying to deliver the EM for tonight testing and finish up fixing Rev 2 release. If it's so important to you, why don't you wait for the release? Causing unnecessary work for the team is totally idiotic. There are a lot of WAY HIGHER PRIORITY stuff over your unnecessary request. |
|
|
|
|
btcsql
|
|
July 13, 2014, 01:22:24 AM |
|
I edited my post to include: Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key: 1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index) that key would suffice in my opinion. The .sig you sent doesn't include the information above. He will be adding that key's fingerprint to his BitcoinTalk account as soon as he gets access to a computer :-) He's been busy away from a machine that can access it at the moment. I'm sure we can provide those items, this was just a short-term fix as we recognised that we needed to give some kind of validation. My countersign of the key (Canonical have verified my identity on Launchpad, if you're concerned about that: https://launchpad.net/~n00bsys0p) is all we've managed for now, but we will be doing this properly as soon as we can organise it. We do realise the necessity for validation of download integrity, and shall be taking steps to improve this for future releases. btcsql, Dan is busy trying to deliver the EM for tonight testing and finish up fixing Rev 2 release. If it's so important to you, why don't you wait for the release? Causing unnecessary work for the team is totally idiotic. There are a lot of WAY HIGHER PRIORITY stuff over your unnecessary request. I'll wait for the release and hope for the best. I wouldn't understate the importance of what I'm asking, though. If it's part of the new release then there is no need for a bounty. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
July 13, 2014, 01:32:23 AM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. Why is that funny? I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford. He, i know people that are sure you can buy a great car with that amount 6 months from now. Wait some more while you think about what you could do with 267 BTC you stored in 2011. There are not so many coins going around & this is a POS coin I didn't even know about Bitcoins in 2011, I heard of them first in 2013 :/. Anyway, I hope that XC will be worth a lot in the times to come and I wish you all best of luck saving as much as possible. |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
July 13, 2014, 01:47:01 AM |
|
How many XC do you have atm?
LOL. Why is that funny? I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford. He, i know people that are sure you can buy a great car with that amount 6 months from now. Wait some more while you think about what you could do with 267 BTC you stored in 2011. There are not so many coins going around & this is a POS coin I didn't even know about Bitcoins in 2011, I heard of them first in 2013 :/. Anyway, I hope that XC will be worth a lot in the times to come and I wish you all best of luck saving as much as possible. we wish as luck as well In the meantime, only good news to come, w8ing for EM release, mac users got anon wallet, we got UI anon wallet, yet volume is low and price small decline. So everything normal in XC land! |
|
|
|
|
