|
Edraket31
|
 |
June 26, 2014, 09:20:19 PM |
|
I'm all for implementing anonymity. Just gotta deliver betting first  But guys, do you have any specific ideas how anonymity should work? Do you have any coin in mind that you think has successfully made its transactions totally anonymous? We could add TOR np, but some people say TOR may cause forks and we don't want that. If someone wish to use proxy to hide his/her IP there's a standard feature that already exists. I think we can easily make the same stuff as PinkCoin has. Would that be useful? For me, you can do the best what you think is most rewarded by market. I have another question...... How do you see the current pricemovements. It seems heavy manipulated but what is your opinion for now and for the future? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:20:24 PM |
|
+100 in pledge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:24:59 PM |
|
I'm all for implementing anonymity. Just gotta deliver betting first But guys, do you have any specific ideas how anonymity should work? Do you have any coin in mind that you think has successfully made its transactions totally anonymous? We could add TOR np, but some people say TOR may cause forks and we don't want that. If someone wish to use proxy to hide his/her IP there's a standard feature that already exists. I think we can easily make the same stuff as PinkCoin has. Would that be useful? currently im still researching anon technologies. i have some ideas of my own. but i wouldnt mind if we just copy and pasted code from another successful coin with some adjustments and something a bit more secure than tor network. the tor will be entry level anonimity. my top suggestions atm come from Vericoin and summercoin V2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=625693.0this navajo technology from summercoin looks interesting. but they will struggle because of unfair distribution as well as having no real framework. plus their pos interest is high and they have about double our supply. i am looking at some other implementations.. but i think a tor implementation is the weakest of anon features and so as much as it will gather larger interest from investors it will not achieve it's true potential. quick moves upward in the market for vericoin and darkcoin shows that they are doing something right. we have all that is open source to choose from. my dev has some suggestions of his own as well, but they are a bit over my head so i am still researching lol |
|
|
|
|
|
joe.sixer
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:36:29 PM |
|
+500 Better to put them to a constructive use  places us at 2500 Minerals towards anon feature request. +200 |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBaBa
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:38:08 PM |
|
Supersend being implemented in supercoin and Nitesend (coinjoin) being implemented by voot ,sync seem interesting but still early too early to tell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:39:13 PM |
|
Minerals team. could you update the OP topic to reflect a bounty being raised for anon technologies? it would serve as some good marketting. even if it is you that takes the bounty for the job eventually. but i am in favour of having it done sooner rather than later so that current investors wont get nervous. we need to make it official that anon technology WILL BE IMPLEMENTED in the very near future!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 09:42:18 PM |
|
+500 Better to put them to a constructive use places us at 2500 Minerals towards anon feature request. +200 2700 minerals towards anon technologes coding |
|
|
|
|
|
Alns
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:00:04 PM |
|
I like the idea of this coin, im in.  |
|
|
|
|
mumak
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
here for a while
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:00:16 PM |
|
I have a problem with my wallet. I started and have error in file src\kernel.cpp, line 372 . What can i do? Pls , help!
what o/s are you running? if windows 7.. then right click on the minerals-qt.exe and select properties. in properties you will see an option to "unblock" at the bottom. select it and apply and try launching the wallet again to see if that fixes your problem. Windows 8.1... In Properties i dont see this option...  ahh ok windows 8.1 go to your appdata folder and backup your "wallet.dat". then delete everything in the folder except your wallet.dat and relaunch the client. make sure you have the latest version and you should be able to launch and resynch fine. This helped! Thank you very much!  |
I ♥ Crypto!
|
|
|
|
komodovpn
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:02:07 PM |
|
Is there a public donation address handled by the dev where we can send minerals to for the anon dev fund, or any other development funding?
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:09:51 PM |
|
Is there a public donation address handled by the dev where we can send minerals to for the anon dev fund, or any other development funding?
indeed. Minerals team, please update thread topic and post a unique dev fund address for anon implementation donations(both btc and minerals). as our discussion on the topic of anon slows so does investor interest. we have managed to acquire near 3000 min donation in just a few minutes. an updated topic and announcement could really put us on more stable ground while u continue working on e-sports betting. we could now remove the e-sports and anon from the poll and replace it with decentralized exchange features for a future project. |
|
|
|
|
grolll
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1014
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:10:24 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2014, 10:51:30 PM by grolll |
|
+ +500 Better to put them to a constructive use places us at 2500 Minerals towards anon feature request. +200 +1150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:13:15 PM |
|
+ +500 Better to put them to a constructive use places us at 2500 Minerals towards anon feature request. +200 +1000 Adress ? 3700+ Minerals towards anon technologies coding. the thread should be updated to reflect the bounty being raised for the tech asap so we can begin submitting donations. |
|
|
|
|
|
baseke
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:41:56 PM |
|
Guys this coin is for all. anon will bring nothing. its better to promote it to some game or smth else.
|
|
|
|
|
j5crypto
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:54:42 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2014, 11:18:11 PM by j5crypto |
|
The last 2 pages of this thread give more more confidence. I'm buying more. We prob wont go under 1500. Anon + e-sport bets is a great combo. Just do tor at first and then work on something more substantial. This coin is looking good.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 10:55:50 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2014, 11:17:11 PM by Coinler |
|
Guys this coin is for all. anon will bring nothing. its better to promote it to some game or smth else.
there are members/investors putting their money where their mouth is to disagree with you. me included. |
|
|
|
|
|
chinchs
|
|
June 26, 2014, 11:07:07 PM |
|
Guys this coin is for all. anon will bring nothing. its better to promote it to some game or smth else.
there are members/investors putting their money where their mouth is to disagree with you. me included. count me for 500 Min, but don't know if we should use it for: * Anon feature * 3rd party coder helping the main developer with betting sys * Promote a tournament * Faucet to spread the word about MIN. * Etc. I guess it would depend on how much we can raise, and how much could cost each point of this list |
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 11:21:32 PM |
|
look on bittrex now. when last have you seen this kind of buy volume? coincidence? if it was excitement over e-sports betting investors the price wouldnt have started sliding in the first place is my view.  im not very well known for my photoshop skills |
|
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 26, 2014, 11:22:52 PM |
|
The last 2 pages of this thread give more more confidence. I'm buying more. We prob wont go under 1500. Anon + e-sport bets is a great combo. Just do tor at first and then work on something more substantial. This coin is looking good. that wouldnt be economical paying twice for an anon implementation by implementing something we know is substandard and then fixing it with a proper implementation later on imo. |
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 26, 2014, 11:24:08 PM |
|
My opinion is: Hurry up and get some form of gaming/betting up and running,,, like yesterday not 2 months from now ,,,, it needs to hurry and create a demand for it now, especially in the SC community and with the Blizzard game heads out there. MIN needs action now to get people buying for this. I have seen great coins slip away during these lulls after launch. Anyone buying right now is doing so on pure speculation,, but more are selling than buying that's the problem.
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
|
Poll
