szwagiercz
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 06, 2014, 01:03:39 PM |
|
"Solo mining? In order to avoid potential ASICs and big farms from dominating the coin network there will be no solo mining." and you don't like pools either well, so fuck you We need to stop freaking morons who are afraid of 20mh/s (at most) machines (big farms don't solomine, actually... in most of the case it is rented rig on pool) Nobody's afraid of 20 mh/s, max hash can be 300 mh/s, on betarigs actually you have only few farms over this limit. I don't see any problem here.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
June 06, 2014, 01:07:57 PM |
|
"Solo mining? In order to avoid potential ASICs and big farms from dominating the coin network there will be no solo mining." and you don't like pools either well, so fuck you We need to stop freaking morons who are afraid of 20mh/s (at most) machines (big farms don't solomine, actually... in most of the case it is rented rig on pool) Nobody's afraid of 20 mh/s, max hash can be 300 mh/s, on betarigs actually you have only few farms over this limit. I don't see any problem here. well they are since they are against solomining
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
atsuky
|
|
June 06, 2014, 01:10:23 PM |
|
You need more vespin gas.... Nice, keep eyes on it!
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 06, 2014, 02:18:41 PM |
|
"Solo mining? In order to avoid potential ASICs and big farms from dominating the coin network there will be no solo mining." and you don't like pools either well, so fuck you We need to stop freaking morons who are afraid of 20mh/s (at most) machines (big farms don't solomine, actually... in most of the case it is rented rig on pool) Nobody's afraid of 20 mh/s, max hash can be 300 mh/s, on betarigs actually you have only few farms over this limit. I don't see any problem here. well they are since they are against solomining We are not against solomining per se. Moreover, big farms that one can rent from betarigs and alike are probably a lesser problem as there are apparently X11 ASICs that were apparent during XC coin boom. Have you seen what happened to XC coin hash rate? It went crazy and no one knew from where the hashes were coming. The only way to prevent this is by not allowing any kind of solomining. Additionally, it is possible to set up a pool by using windows wallet only - this is another reason against providing windows wallet during the POW stage.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 06, 2014, 02:21:20 PM |
|
Great. The coin looks awesome and i will surely mine some during launch. Can you provide some info about the team which is working with you?
Currently, we are a team of 3 people. Two of us developed the coin and the third person is system administrator who made modifications to stratum code and will run the pools.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 06, 2014, 02:26:21 PM |
|
btw are there any plans for anything else except the fresh idea for mining ? I mean yeah, organizing a few tournaments will get the attention eventually, well it will get the attention if the prices are big enough and you can get some top Koreans in the tournaments. But other than that do you have any other plans ? Like anon function or well anything else that might be considered as "new" ( not that anon is new but it seems to be the "cool kid" right now. )
We are pondering about additional features, including anonymity. However, there are already a handful of coins that are competing who will be the first to implement the anonymity feature in the correct way. I am not sure that joining this race will add much value.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
ChekaZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1884
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 06, 2014, 02:35:08 PM |
|
I love Starcraft, gonna follow this release
|
BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45 FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY
|
|
|
totoy
|
|
June 06, 2014, 07:07:25 PM |
|
Mineral launch detected.. Im in
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
June 06, 2014, 07:09:33 PM |
|
Goddamnit Marie they are minerals.
|
|
|
|
ElitistCA
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 477
Merit: 250
Blockchain Just Entered The Real World
|
|
June 06, 2014, 09:15:27 PM |
|
There are many X11 coins these days, seems like every market must be over saturated - and killed. Just human nature.
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
June 06, 2014, 09:38:33 PM |
|
will the pools be connected and share the blocks like LTC p2pool network, or will they compete?
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 06, 2014, 10:08:02 PM |
|
will the pools be connected and share the blocks like LTC p2pool network, or will they compete?
Well, we didn't build this feature as these are stratum pools. We'll think about it but my guess is that it will not be a quick solution for stratum so probably pools will compete. There are many X11 coins these days, seems like every market must be over saturated - and killed. Just human nature.
Algo doesn't matter as there will be no usual suspects who are killing the coin. X11 was chosen due to lower energy demand.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
tk808
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1124
Invest in your knowledge
|
|
June 07, 2014, 03:18:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
tramphuochuy
|
|
June 07, 2014, 04:24:09 AM |
|
We can limit per worker but IP , every worker should be than < 25 Mh/s ( example )
|
|
|
|
CryptoLaunch
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Cryptolaunch.net for all coin launches and pumps!
|
|
June 07, 2014, 05:51:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
anon4250158
|
|
June 07, 2014, 07:57:29 AM |
|
What's the network byte for addresses? (Bitcoin's is 0x00)
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:41:44 AM |
|
What's the network byte for addresses? (Bitcoin's is 0x00)
PUBKEY_ADDRESS = 50 or in hex 0x32
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:45:07 AM |
|
We can limit per worker but IP , every worker should be than < 25 Mh/s ( example )
This was my initial thought as well, however this incentivizes to game the system by creating multiple workers. Maybe we will just limit the worker's hashrate and not the IP's, it is still debatable.
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:48:20 AM |
|
"Big farms/ASICs? Hashing power of each worker and IP will be limited to not more than 300MH (open for discussion) by limiting the number of shares that a worker can send to the pool per unit of time."
WTF i missed this, fucking great!!
you can limit it per time, so if a guy with 300 MH/s jump it won't mean other can mine anymore
you can do a 300MH/s limit increase every 1 hour or so
dunno if it's possible just per IP..
|
|
|
|
Bfljosh
|
|
June 07, 2014, 10:51:41 AM |
|
Do we have additional pylons guys?
|
|
|
|
|