tramphuochuy
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:07:40 PM |
|
50M is high , max setup with 8 vga on mainboard ~ 25 Mh/s , it's should be l< 25Mh/worker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Bitornio
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:08:46 PM |
|
so you basically restricted access to the source and wallet for no reason considering people can easily split their hashing to multiple workers. this was a retarded idea. just release the source
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:12:49 PM |
|
front-end of scv.minerals.pro is dead, dev are implementing IP filter?
|
|
|
|
paulnux
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:14:59 PM |
|
no IP limted GOOD BYE
|
|
|
|
komodovpn
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:15:47 PM |
|
can't seem to access 4 of the 6 available pools. I can only access the Ireland and Singapore pools
|
|
|
|
megadestruct61
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:16:04 PM |
|
front-end of scv.minerals.pro is dead, dev are implementing IP filter?
ONE CAN HOPE, I like the idea of stopping the huge miners. With my 10 Mh/s it seems a lil unfair there is someone on pool with 900 Mh/s.
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:16:29 PM |
|
front-end of scv.minerals.pro is dead, dev are implementing IP filter?
front end is back up it looks like... as far as the IP filter limiting, i had thought that was the plan all along..
|
|
|
|
tramphuochuy
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:17:45 PM |
|
It's every worker has to <50M to anti asic It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
|
|
|
|
megadestruct61
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:26:49 PM |
|
It's every worker has to <50M to anti asic It's ok if they use bunch of VGA and total hash rate > 50M
And i think it's good if devs changes limit from 50 -> 25Mh/worker
I thought the real point was to make the coin more evenly distributed throughout the community. People running these farms generating 900 Mh/s are for sure going to dump the coin as soon as it hits exchanges. If we actually did try and limit the big farms it would be much more interesting price discovery on the markets.
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:29:00 PM |
|
thats right i absolutly agree the cunts with farms should be banned they are the epitome of the banksters, greed greed greed nothing to do with mining the coin for what it is
ban them
|
|
|
|
drm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:31:38 PM |
|
its already to late to limit now imo.. the concept was great and drew a lot of attention (false promises though) just have to wait for the next coin that will use this idea and will do it in an honest way, not after 24 hours when the farms have gotten their big shares already..
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:34:41 PM |
|
thats right i absolutly agree the cunts with farms should be banned they are the epitome of the banksters, greed greed greed nothing to do with mining the coin for what it is
ban them
they are the reason for all the dump big farm are bad as fuck, lead to centralization, nothing is good from a big farm next coin should ban anyone with 25mega, not based on ip or worker, but from the pool directly, like i've said before also put a proxy checker and try to ban vpn to prevent multiple registration by a single user
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:39:19 PM |
|
yep if it isn't sorted out then the trolls will win the argument and this coin will be finished, the farms have had 3 hrs already at low difficulty
Good idea but unfortuinantly bad application, i'll give th dev another hour if nothing changes i'll go mine something else
|
|
|
|
Winky
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:39:24 PM |
|
thats right i absolutly agree the cunts with farms should be banned they are the epitome of the banksters, greed greed greed nothing to do with mining the coin for what it is
ban them
they are the reason for all the dump big farm are bad as fuck, lead to centralization, nothing is good from a big farm next coin should ban anyone with 25mega, not based on ip or worker, but from the pool directly, like i've said before also put a proxy checker and try to ban vpn to prevent multiple registration by a single user +1
|
|
|
|
megadestruct61
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:42:51 PM |
|
http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/minerals-x11-powpos-with-no-wallet-download-before-end-of-powQuote from the article "There is another twist you should be aware of. Each miner will be limited to a certain maximum hashpower to no more than 300 MH/s. To achieve this, the number of shares that a worker can send to the pool per unit" of time, are limited." You guys need to make this happen. Right now in my pool alone there are 4 people above the 300 MH/s limit you own article states. I'm sure when you take these few large farms over 300 MH/s spread out over the pools account for better then half the effing hash rate. FIX DIS SHIZ
|
|
|
|
amit2007gunjan
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:44:14 PM |
|
yep if it isn't sorted out then the trolls will win the argument and this coin will be finished, the farms have had 3 hrs already at low difficulty
Good idea but unfortuinantly bad application
+1. Please,implement the idea in toto not haphazardly.
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:49:52 PM |
|
Rank Donor User Name KH/s MIN/Day 1 anonymous 489,853 46,212.551 2 anonymous 331,293 31,254.077 3 anonymous 162,534 15,333.378 4 anonymous 148,121 13,973.709 5 anonymous 129,574 12,223.918 6 anonymous 129,128 12,181.901 7 anonymous 124,176 11,714.746 8 anonymous 110,105 10,387.253 9 anonymous 103,767 9,789.340 10 FancyDancy 94,360 8,901.886 11 teomihsav 93,390 8,810.357 12 anonymous 90,803 8,566.328 13 anonymous 86,473 8,157.802 14 soltim 85,586 8,074.190 15 eon 83,498 7,877.148 n/a foxyminer 25,693 2,423.839
LOL MILNE CHANHED TO ANONYMOUS WHAT A DOOSH!
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:52:42 PM |
|
We are working on limiting big miners right now It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
MiMiMiner
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:53:17 PM |
|
We are working on limiting big miners right now It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made?
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:54:12 PM |
|
We are working on limiting big miners right now It will be ready in few hours
I suggest big miners to quit mining Minerals or you'll be losing hashpower soon
What will you do with the coins they have made? they will not be making coins, just more rejected shares
|
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
|