[ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution |

[jc12345]

little more notice would be nice i'm at work for another 3 hours, not cool

You shouldn't have misused the system to start with.

[iqacid]

Nice action!

[tylerderden]

little more notice would be nice i'm at work for another 3 hours, not cool

You shouldn't have misused the system to start with.

what the hell are you talking about misused the system? I have several rigs using several worker names, are you retarded or something?

[Acidyo]

little more notice would be nice i'm at work for another 3 hours, not cool

You shouldn't have misused the system to start with.

Yup, or just get a remote for your miner, it's not that hard.

[Minerals]

30 minutes untill worker removal

[tylerderden]

i dont have time to babysit miners based on whatever whim these "devs" decide to spring on us in an hours notice. I wouldn't have even known had i not popped on here on my break to check shit out. if you want to be taken seriously than be professional for shits sake. an hours notice isn't cool in any aspect of crypto. and i usually do remote to my rigs but something is down and i'm not home to check on it at the moment.

[shanecoins]

shit happens.... I like this dev

[tramphuochuy]

My hash is ~ 45Mh but sometime it touch ~> 51Mh ( on website )   , Have i banned ?

[sovie]

turn one of your cards down by 1mh 

[shanecoins]

My hash is ~ 45Mh but sometime it touch ~> 51Mh  

lend me 5Mh

[Minerals]

My hash is ~ 45Mh but sometime it touch ~> 51Mh ( on website )   , Have i banned ?

Don't worry, there is nothing wrong with having 51 MH/s. It just means that sometimes your worker will be banned for a short while, however most of the times there will be no ban.

[PepiX]

what the hell are you talking about misused the system? I have several rigs using several worker names, are you retarded or something?

Well.. the anon clearly states 'designed to be as evenly distributed as possible across vast group of miners'. What did you not understand? A move like that is expected..

[tylerderden]

what the hell are you talking about misused the system? I have several rigs using several worker names, are you retarded or something?

Well.. the anon clearly states 'designed to be as evenly distributed as possible across vast group of miners'. What did you not understand? A move like that is expected..

sure and i don't have a problem with that, i think it's great to try and limit the hash in fact. but earlier they said they would give plenty of notice, not sure the timeframe he stated but it was not 60 minutes. Fair goes both ways dude, fair timeframe, fair distribution whatever. you don't get to pick and choose when to play the fair card and when to say fuck everybody. Most people use several worker names so you can tell if one is offline, hence the whole reason for the design. having a bunch of rigs under one workername is just stupid and inefficient. i'm sure there are alot of people that are going to be pissed when they get home and half their rigs are disconnected because some of us have jobs and can't hang out in mom's basement all day watching the fans spin. but whatever, mine will just failover to a better coin anyway so..

[merc84]

ok, here goes:

We are to remove all workers except one (the first worker that you've created) at minerals.pro pools in ~1 hour (00:00 GMT)

You will not be able to create more then 1 worker per account after the removal

Please make sure to leave only first worker mining Minerals

PS: if you have several small mining rigs you may use 1 worker for all of them, all valid shares that they produce will be accepted just as well as if you were using multiple workers for each rig.

so we get 1 hour to create multiple accounts using different email accounts with 1 worker each?
did i get it right?

Yes, that is correct

I'm curious why not also limit one pool account per IP, sure there are still ways around that but it becomes more time consuming to cheat the limit.

[MinermanNC]

what the hell are you talking about misused the system? I have several rigs using several worker names, are you retarded or something?

Well.. the anon clearly states 'designed to be as evenly distributed as possible across vast group of miners'. What did you not understand? A move like that is expected..

sure and i don't have a problem with that, i think it's great to try and limit the hash in fact. but earlier they said they would give plenty of notice, not sure the timeframe he stated but it was not 60 minutes. Fair goes both ways dude, fair timeframe, fair distribution whatever. you don't get to pick and choose when to play the fair card and when to say fuck everybody. Most people use several worker names so you can tell if one is offline, hence the whole reason for the design. having a bunch of rigs under one workername is just stupid and inefficient. i'm sure there are alot of people that are going to be pissed when they get home and half their rigs are disconnected because some of us have jobs and can't hang out in mom's basement all day watching the fans spin. but whatever, mine will just failover to a better coin anyway so..

I am considering mining this coin now, but after seeing that all my rigs will point to 1 worker I'm not so sure. I check them all the time to see if any of stalled etc ...without that I will loose hashing and have to walk out to my mining shed a lot more often! lol I agree with your point, but also agree with what the devs are doing to control rig renters and alike, whom I despise lol,,, I think they should go about it a different way, although this does achieve the objective for them "in a pinch"  

[PWDDCZ]

Minerals,do you need a chinese translation?

[splawik21]

6 pools * 50 MHs  max is 300MHs so...

[pos4me]

You are offering less than one whole block for a cool logo.
Awesome.
Where can I sign up?

[Minerals]

what the hell are you talking about misused the system? I have several rigs using several worker names, are you retarded or something?

Well.. the anon clearly states 'designed to be as evenly distributed as possible across vast group of miners'. What did you not understand? A move like that is expected..

sure and i don't have a problem with that, i think it's great to try and limit the hash in fact. but earlier they said they would give plenty of notice, not sure the timeframe he stated but it was not 60 minutes. Fair goes both ways dude, fair timeframe, fair distribution whatever. you don't get to pick and choose when to play the fair card and when to say fuck everybody. Most people use several worker names so you can tell if one is offline, hence the whole reason for the design. having a bunch of rigs under one workername is just stupid and inefficient. i'm sure there are alot of people that are going to be pissed when they get home and half their rigs are disconnected because some of us have jobs and can't hang out in mom's basement all day watching the fans spin. but whatever, mine will just failover to a better coin anyway so..

I agree with you that maybe the timing of the announcement is not perfect. We did ponder of making such a move for a while but the reason we are moving quickly is because the community is demanding it and we want to deliver.

[WestOstrich]

If miners can just create multiple accounts with 1 miner, why even bother deleting the multiple workers? That's no more than a speed hump...