|
anarchyx914
|
 |
June 13, 2014, 02:48:02 PM |
|
Pretty sure both Polo and Bittrex have already indicated that they are staying away from the coin due to it being closed source for the moment. They might reconsider after PoW is over tho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
anarchyx914
|
|
June 13, 2014, 02:52:23 PM |
|
Workers getting temporarily banned is getting annoying. Especially when my combined hashrate between all 3 of my rigs is only about 31-35mH.
Any way around this?.
[10:49:19] Network diff set to 82
[10:49:19] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[10:49:36] Rejected 065a6a5b Diff 0.157/0.040 GPU 3 Pool 0 (Worker is temporaril
y banned
[10:49:55] Rejected 0492c5e7 Diff 0.219/0.040 GPU 3 Pool 0 (Worker is temporaril
y banned
[10:50:21] Accepted 01d8b8f6 Diff 0.542/0.040 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[10:50:21] Accepted 0cc61853 Diff 0.078/0.040 GPU 5 at Pool 0
[10:51:05] Accepted 1512353a Diff 0.047/0.040 GPU 5 at Pool 0
[10:51:37] Accepted 101946a2 Diff 0.062/0.040 GPU 5 at Pool 0
[10:51:44] Rejected 0704d837 Diff 0.142/0.040 GPU 2 Pool 0 (Job '97a5' not found)
[10:52:18] Rejected 12848117 Diff 0.054/0.040 GPU 5 Pool 0 (Job '97a5' not found)
[10:52:23] Stratum connection to Pool 0 interrupted
[10:52:23] Lost 1 shares due to stratum disconnect on Pool 0
[10:52:26] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.005
[10:52:28] Network diff set to 111
[10:52:28] New block detected on network before pool notification
[10:52:31] Accepted 89d1fe97 Diff 0.007/0.005 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[10:52:31] Stratum from Pool 0 requested work restart
|
|
|
|
|
|
amit2007gunjan
|
|
June 13, 2014, 02:58:06 PM |
|
Pretty sure both Polo and Bittrex have already indicated that they are staying away from the coin due to it being closed source for the moment. They might reconsider after PoW is over tho.
Source is available for exchanges. If you are so sure then give us your source of information. |
|
|
|
|
anarchyx914
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:02:45 PM |
|
Pretty sure both Polo and Bittrex have already indicated that they are staying away from the coin due to it being closed source for the moment. They might reconsider after PoW is over tho.
Source is available for exchanges. If you are so sure then give us your source of information. Making the source open to exchanges does not mean that its open source... I'm sure they are reluctant to add because the community has not had the chance to review it for several days. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:04:49 PM |
|
There is problems with SCV pool ? They don't seem to find any blocks in last 20min, and the diff has gone down ? Fork ?
Just one unlucky block..  |
|
|
|
|
qunity3d
Member
 Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 13, 2014, 03:51:19 PM |
|
There is information on whether it will add Bittrex and when?
|
|
|
|
|
northwind6
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:03:22 PM |
|
There is information on whether it will add Bittrex and when?
Probably never. |
|
|
|
|
WalkerLi
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
hello world, hello crypto
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:13:03 PM |
|
There is information on whether it will add Bittrex and when?
Probably never. why, it seems a nice coin. |
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:21:25 PM |
|
There is information on whether it will add Bittrex and when?
Probably never. why, it seems a nice coin. Perhaps they don't have balls to stand up against Dedicated? |
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:26:47 PM |
|
Pretty sure both Polo and Bittrex have already indicated that they are staying away from the coin due to it being closed source for the moment. They might reconsider after PoW is over tho.
Source is available for exchanges. If you are so sure then give us your source of information. Making the source open to exchanges does not mean that its open source... I'm sure they are reluctant to add because the community has not had the chance to review it for several days. The source code is available to anyone who is knowledgeable enough to inspect it and give his/her opinion. Releasing the source code publicly would mean Multipools/Big farms/etc will start mining the coin and the whole idea behind Minerals will be killed in one shot. |
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:36:45 PM |
|
i want to know a thing dev
can the same user run 100mh/s in two different pools(2 x 50 mh/s) or he get banned? you check the ip?
could you answer my question plz? |
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:43:17 PM |
|
i want to know a thing dev
can the same user run 100mh/s in two different pools(2 x 50 mh/s) or he get banned? you check the ip?
could you answer my question plz? as of now there is no restriction for that. However we keep a close eye on different ways to circumvent 50 Mh/s limit. We are not checking the IPs across different pools. We might incorporate this limitation in the future, however I doubt it will be done. |
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
virtualdn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1093
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:50:05 PM |
|
paper wallet launching very soon
|
1 BTC = 1 BTC
|
|
|
|
nfox
|
|
June 13, 2014, 04:58:06 PM |
|
Transfers are fast, quite impressive  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
anarchyx914
|
|
June 13, 2014, 05:03:39 PM |
|
Good explanation as to why Bittrex wont add this:
<@bittrex-rami> I don't like the concept
<@bittrex-rami> I don't want to encourage it
<@bittrex-rami> and source doesn't protect me from double spends
<@bittrex-rami> distributed hash does
<Scorpianz> What do you mean by distrubtuted hash?
<Scorpianz> *distributed
<@bittrex-rami> if anyone is in a position to do a 51% attack
<@bittrex-rami> then I want to know about it, and disable that wallet
<@bittrex-rami> the way they've structured their launch
<@bittrex-rami> they control 100% of the hash
<@bittrex-rami> puts us at risk
<earlz> yea, but they seem trust worthy, right RIGHT
<@bittrex-rami> now our systems would detect the first double spend and shut ti down
<Scorpianz> What is this 51% attack
<@bittrex-rami> but it could still hurt me if the first batch of double spends was large enough
|
|
|
|
|
zedomax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2014, 05:10:08 PM |
|
i think its better off not being on an exchange at this time unless it was poloniex or bittrex. i would take that ccex exchange off asap it only makes the coin look like shitcoin when u have it on 3rd tier exchanges. i see a ton of new coins that go downhill by starting with the wrong exchange. why dont u do a poll and decide what the community wants to do. but at this point i m ready to jump ship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
richiela
|
|
June 13, 2014, 05:12:09 PM |
|
Good explanation as to why Bittrex wont add this:
<@bittrex-rami> I don't like the concept
<@bittrex-rami> I don't want to encourage it
<@bittrex-rami> and source doesn't protect me from double spends
<@bittrex-rami> distributed hash does
<Scorpianz> What do you mean by distrubtuted hash?
<Scorpianz> *distributed
<@bittrex-rami> if anyone is in a position to do a 51% attack
<@bittrex-rami> then I want to know about it, and disable that wallet
<@bittrex-rami> the way they've structured their launch
<@bittrex-rami> they control 100% of the hash
<@bittrex-rami> puts us at risk
<earlz> yea, but they seem trust worthy, right RIGHT
<@bittrex-rami> now our systems would detect the first double spend and shut ti down
<Scorpianz> What is this 51% attack
<@bittrex-rami> but it could still hurt me if the first batch of double spends was large enough
Since we've inadvertently commented.... I might as well make an official statement. We've stayed pretty quiet on the matter and we normally stay impartial on coins; but Source code available != open source. In this case, we have a scenario where a single entity controls all the hashpower of a coin. This means at any given time, the blockchain can be completely rewritten to anything a malicious entity wanted it to. I'm not saying that is the intention, but from the POV of an exchange, the lack of decentralization adds an extremely high risk to our users and business. Once the hash power is spread around some and we feel the network has its own built in checks and balances is when we'll probably add. If we are missing something here, please let me know. I'm always the first to admit i don't know everything. Thanks richie@bittrex |
|
|
|
|
LiteMine
|
|
June 13, 2014, 05:21:55 PM |
|
Since we've inadvertently commented.... I might as well make an official statement. We've stayed pretty quiet on the matter and we normally stay impartial on coins; but Source code available != open source. In this case, we have a scenario where a single entity controls all the hashpower of a coin. This means at any given time, the blockchain can be completely rewritten to anything a malicious entity wanted it to. I'm not saying that is the intention, but from the POV of an exchange, the lack of decentralization adds an extremely high risk to our users and business. Once the hash power is spread around some and we feel the network has its own built in checks and balances is when we'll probably add.
If we are missing something here, please let me know. I'm always the first to admit i don't know everything.
Thanks
richie@bittrex
So no problem adding it once POW is over in 6 days and the wallet is released? |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenta
|
|
June 13, 2014, 05:25:46 PM |
|
Since we've inadvertently commented.... I might as well make an official statement. We've stayed pretty quiet on the matter and we normally stay impartial on coins; but Source code available != open source. In this case, we have a scenario where a single entity controls all the hashpower of a coin. This means at any given time, the blockchain can be completely rewritten to anything a malicious entity wanted it to. I'm not saying that is the intention, but from the POV of an exchange, the lack of decentralization adds an extremely high risk to our users and business. Once the hash power is spread around some and we feel the network has its own built in checks and balances is when we'll probably add.
If we are missing something here, please let me know. I'm always the first to admit i don't know everything.
Thanks
richie@bittrex
So no problem adding it once POW is over in 6 days and the wallet is released? Cool! I like their style!  |
|
|
|
|
Poll
