[XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS

[gxnfei]

Crypti would become a distinctive innovation coins.Team. Funds. Concept

[1714959219]

1714959219

[1714959219]

1714959219

[1714959219]

1714959219

[GreXX]

The current revision (rev 0.03) of the Crypti Foundation Charter is finally ready for review.

This is a complete re-write from some of the previous versions so please read through the Charter and give us your thoughts either here or on the blog.

You can read it here: http://blog.crypti.me/the-crypti-foundation-rev-0-03/

We have also updated the OP to reflect the new revision.

I am really looking forward to hearing your thoughts so please take a minute and give it a look!

[GreXX]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

[poornamelessme]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

[Skatebird]

Poloniex is one of the best alt coins exchange so please push to get it !!

[pabloangello]

Smell of pump beggars is so strong

[fred930]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

Sorry, but austin global is now closed. Their website at https://agx.io/ now says

Austin Global Exchange thanks all its customers, partners, and advocates for your support over the last 4 months. AGX closed its operations July 31st, 2014.

[profitofthegods]

The current revision (rev 0.03) of the Crypti Foundation Charter is finally ready for review.

This is a complete re-write from some of the previous versions so please read through the Charter and give us your thoughts either here or on the blog.

You can read it here: http://blog.crypti.me/the-crypti-foundation-rev-0-03/

We have also updated the OP to reflect the new revision.

I am really looking forward to hearing your thoughts so please take a minute and give it a look!

That's really great, its nice to see a foundation willing to accept such substantial community input, much better than the way these things are normally run, and on a personal note I'm happy you are going to give away memberships to early adopters.  

[poornamelessme]

Sorry, but austin global is now closed. Their website at https://agx.io/ now says

Austin Global Exchange thanks all its customers, partners, and advocates for your support over the last 4 months. AGX closed its operations July 31st, 2014.

Definitely not a good choice then...

I expect a number of the small guys to eventually close, as when you look at volume, it's simply not there. Some of the dinky exchanges have basically no volume at all -- guess they can be useful for really small coins that can't get on other exchanges though.

[50cent_rapper]

Poloniex and BTER are the best ones.

Bittrex is not good for long-term project. They add and delist coins every few days. So it's more pump and dump exchange.

[Hueristic]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

[kikeda]

Smell of pump beggars is so strong

LMAO +1

[poornamelessme]

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

Can't disagree with any of that. I just mentioned some of the dinkier exchanges in the rare situation that the coin had problems getting on the larger exchanges or the devs wanted extra exchanges for arbitrage volume.

I don't mind Cryptsy so much, although it is sort of like a lumbering dinosaur as far as their site goes. They have volume, like you say, regardless of what people think of them. If they can get Cryptsy + one or both of Polo/Bittrex, they should get plenty of volume.

On a personal level I do like Polo a lot, just that it's sort of a middle level exchange as far as volume goes. Best to add one of the others with it, if they can.

[Yuzu]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

Since Moolah is taking over Mintpal perhaps they can do something to secure customer confidence in the future.  Personally, I won't trade at Cryptsy.  I can deal with Bittrex, Poloniex and Bter.

[GreXX]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

Since Moolah is taking over Mintpal perhaps they can do something to secure customer confidence in the future.  Personally, I won't trade at Cryptsy.  I can deal with Bittrex, Poloniex and Bter.

On a side note, how do you all feel about Moolah as a company? After reading articles about Alex Green and a little bit of the history there I am not sure what to think.

[Wulfcastle]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

Since Moolah is taking over Mintpal perhaps they can do something to secure customer confidence in the future.  Personally, I won't trade at Cryptsy.  I can deal with Bittrex, Poloniex and Bter.

On a side note, how do you all feel about Moolah as a company? After reading articles about Alex Green and a little bit of the history there I am not sure what to think.

From what I've read, Moolah as a company is terrific, but Alex Green as a CEO is terrible. There's a ton of controversy surrounding him (not Moolah) regarding events in the Dogecoin community :

- http://thecoinfront.com/moolah-ceo-alex-green-addresses-recent-controversy/
- http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/leaked-video-moolah-ceo-threatens-legal-action-dogecoin-creator/2014/07/04

I'd say the only hindrance to Moolah is the bad PR that Alex Green has brought upon himself and as a result the company.

[Litoshi]

I have noticed several people recommending we negotiate with Poloniex to be listed at launch. I am unfamiliar with this exchange but will bring it up to the team and look into it.

If anyone would like to get together a list of reputable exchanges that they would like to see Crypti on, I will work on trying to get in touch and see what our options are.

The standard ones seem to be : bittrex, poloniex, cryptsy and mintpal. At the lower end side of things there is c-cex, swisscex, austin global, etc. I wouldn't bother with most of the smaller exchanges to start with, though.

Poloniex would be a good choice to go after. Bittrex and Cryptsy would be good choices too.

AGX has closed, c-cex, swisscex are sketchy IMO. I really like poloniex as well and truly hate Craptsy. But lots of volume there. Mintpal has has a serious breach that has shaken alot of peops confidence. Don't worry about Mint, when the volume is high enough they will add just to get there Slice of the pie. Actually Craptsy will as well.

Since Moolah is taking over Mintpal perhaps they can do something to secure customer confidence in the future.  Personally, I won't trade at Cryptsy.  I can deal with Bittrex, Poloniex and Bter.

On a side note, how do you all feel about Moolah as a company? After reading articles about Alex Green and a little bit of the history there I am not sure what to think.

From what I've read, Moolah as a company is terrific, but Alex Green as a CEO is terrible. There's a ton of controversy surrounding him (not Moolah) regarding events in the Dogecoin community :

- http://thecoinfront.com/moolah-ceo-alex-green-addresses-recent-controversy/
- http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/leaked-video-moolah-ceo-threatens-legal-action-dogecoin-creator/2014/07/04

I'd say the only hindrance to Moolah is the bad PR that Alex Green has brought upon himself and as a result the company.

They said the same things about Steve Jobs at Apple in the 90s.  They even fired him. 

[Litoshi]

The current revision (rev 0.03) of the Crypti Foundation Charter is finally ready for review.

This is a complete re-write from some of the previous versions so please read through the Charter and give us your thoughts either here or on the blog.

You can read it here: http://blog.crypti.me/the-crypti-foundation-rev-0-03/

We have also updated the OP to reflect the new revision.

I am really looking forward to hearing your thoughts so please take a minute and give it a look!

You have not spelled out the relationship of the Foundation to XCR.  You have a short statement of the goal of making XCR a global cyber currency, but it is incomplete.  It sounds like the Foundation is just an advisory panel.  What about Incorporation?  You have a Board of Directors similar to a Corporation. 

You may consider making the Foundation a Non-revokable Trust instead.  It is similar to a Corporation, but without stock; just trustees.

Needed is a statement on the ownership BY THE FOUNDATION (not an individual) of the coin, software, and domain names.

Where does the decision on future changes in XCR reside?  Devs or Foundation? 

[sanbashiyi]

price will pump if big whale and dumper stop dump this coin i think 

[GreXX]

The current revision (rev 0.03) of the Crypti Foundation Charter is finally ready for review.

This is a complete re-write from some of the previous versions so please read through the Charter and give us your thoughts either here or on the blog.

You can read it here: http://blog.crypti.me/the-crypti-foundation-rev-0-03/

We have also updated the OP to reflect the new revision.

I am really looking forward to hearing your thoughts so please take a minute and give it a look!

You have not spelled out the relationship of the Foundation to XCR.  You have a short statement of the goal of making XCR a global cyber currency, but it is incomplete.  It sounds like the Foundation is just an advisory panel.  What about Incorporation?  You have a Board of Directors similar to a Corporation.  

You may consider making the Foundation a Non-revokable Trust instead.  It is similar to a Corporation, but without stock; just trustees.

Needed is a statement on the ownership BY THE FOUNDATION (not an individual) of the coin, software, and domain names.

Where does the decision on future changes in XCR reside?  Devs or Foundation?  

Thank you for your comments.

The Foundation will own all domain names and the software (although the software will be open source eventually).

As to ownership of the coin, I don't think that can really be established once the coin is launched. At that point no one can truly own the coin.

As far as future changes go, there are no "devs" once the main net is launched and all core members of the current development team will be making decisions as members of the Board of the Foundation. The Foundation will make all decisions for the future of XCR.

The Foundation is not simply an advisory panel. The Board could be considered an advisory panel, but the Foundation will be hiring developers, marketers, and others to help develop, market, and build the Crypti network, partnerships, and future. Our goal is to have the Crypti Foundation work strictly on promoting the XCR network, building new features into the coin, and creating partnerships with service and product based companies on top of the Crypti network.

This is partially the reason we are billing it as a foundation and not incorporating at this time. We considered incorporation but determined that it didn't quite foster the community based aspects we wanted to foster. We want to focus on the core functionality and capabilities of the network, marketing those functions, and bringing partners to create the "killer apps" for the Crypti network. That's not to say that some key features that will run on the custom block chains won't be developed by us, as we have several in the pipeline. The difference is that they aren't being built to profit but are rather things that we consider core features of what Crypti will eventually be.

These are just my thoughts and responses as always and I will let others chime in as well. Please keep the conversation going. This is why we wanted to post the Charter for the community to review and consider.

Edit to add: I honestly hadn't even considered an irrevocable trust, so that is something we could look into. Thanks!