bitalk1
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 1494
Merit: 3
|
 |
December 09, 2021, 08:13:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitalk1
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1494
Merit: 3
|
|
December 12, 2021, 10:29:06 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ormin79
|
|
December 30, 2021, 07:56:50 AM
Last edit: December 31, 2021, 04:08:40 PM by ormin79 |
|
price of XYM looks now very attractive (overnight was even around 0.18) but i am still missing final dump in broad market combined with technical situation of BTC and ETH. I got the feeling that something will change inthe first quarter of 2022 and maybe some rocket will launch here temporary. Maybe with real listing on Binance. That is maybe one chance to make speculative profit in case of such strange project  Happy NEM Year 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
broadhurst
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 159
Merit: 4
|
|
January 12, 2022, 11:56:15 AM |
|
2000 pages of shitcoin techno babble |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
January 13, 2022, 03:53:08 PM
Last edit: January 17, 2022, 01:27:36 PM by AntiNoise |
|
I'm very surprised that anyone who starts a promotion for NEM / Symbol immediately expects a refund:
" Symbol Blog@blog_symbol "
" Just a reminder, please support those community members that are contributing to the ecosystem by delegating to their nodes, it is a show of moral support as well as financial. Kickback nodes obviously put a bit more in your pocket but generally do nothing for #Symbol as a whole "
I'm not sure how you can give a +100 here as a core dev ?
Since our nodes are not needed, maybe we should all switch off. Very sad ....
THX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ormin79
|
|
January 19, 2022, 04:13:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
January 21, 2022, 02:06:00 PM
Last edit: January 21, 2022, 02:24:54 PM by AntiNoise |
|
" https://twitter.com/NCOSIGIMCITYNRE/status/1484141677317136392?cxt=HHwWkIC5jcC_3ZgpAAAA " It's a little unclear to me what's new about it. It looks similar under NIS1. A much bigger problem of centralisation is that a large part of the symbol nodes run on the operator allnodes. I have nothing against the operator Allnodes, they do a good job and certainly have their justification in the ecosystem. Nevertheless, it is wrong if >1/3 of the nodes run on the operator allnodes and can thus be influenced by a centralised operator at any time. We have seen what this can mean with the Hardfork. Fortunately, the operator Allnodes made the right decision and reset the upgrade. Thus, the individual tenants of the nodes on the operator allnodes had the choice and could decide freely. Will this still be the case in the future? What really annoys me here is that there was no objection from the core devs. Instead, this first and wrong decision by the operator Allnodes was supported by the core devs during the hardfork.
That's why I find this Twitter post rather hypocritical.
In the future, there should be no further promotion or support for node operators who operate their nodes in this way. This affects a large part of the Japanese community, among others. This will perhaps shift the balance a bit again (decentralised). thx |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
January 22, 2022, 12:41:52 PM
Last edit: January 24, 2022, 09:22:04 AM by AntiNoise |
|
Maybe everyone should calm down and let the arguments speak for themselves. This can be seen neither on the side of the core devs nor on the opposite side. There is not only black or white. " https://twitter.com/Jaguar0625/status/1485257317675417602 " " I am not working for the entitled SN holder." This is true and none of the so-called SN operators would expect this. On the other hand, there are no SN operators under symbol. That's why I don't understand this statement. There are only node operators. And everyone can buy as much XYM as they want. This means that it can operate a voting node, but it has no advantage over other nodes. Instead, it bears a greater risk than a peer or Api node operator. That's why posts about SN contributors under Symbol actually make no sense at all. Some operate their own node and others operate a node on a central platform (allnodes). (What do I think about this? See one post above.) That is why everyone who runs a node via the operator allnodes should hold back with his opinion. A large part of the SN operators under NIS1, have jumped ship long ago. The SN operators + NIS1 node operators who have continued to support NIS1 have in some cases taken a great risk and ensured that, for example, Japanese projects such as Nemgraph etc., had a reasonable transition period available. Now these SN operators are being called the last dirt. If you look at it closely, the SN operators were the contributors of the years since 2014. No one is born as an operator of a SN. Everybody starts small. And everyone has contributed something to NEM in their own way. Now the question is actually who is responsible for the mistakes of the past years. Unfortunately, the core devs are evading responsibility here. After all, they were significantly involved in every wrong decision. Isn't that so? |
|
|
|
|
|
ormin79
|
|
January 24, 2022, 07:20:21 PM |
|
i bet that BTC makes some significant dip near 33k i decide to buy significant stack of XYM (15/16 cents) beside rebuying of MATIC of course (1.4$)  If i am wrong i will be doomed for trying to be smarter than market  |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
January 27, 2022, 08:00:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ormin79
|
|
January 31, 2022, 05:32:58 PM
Last edit: February 04, 2022, 08:29:51 AM by ormin79 |
|
Quasicrystal of dates 30.11.2013/15.12.2017 and 24.01.2022 works perfekt as significant dip. However BTC and ETH should not be so profitable in that upmove. Maybe XYM will be much more First significant top should occur in this last journey in March, final in May. We should be thankful for FED that they moved crash near that time (June 2022). November 2021 was planned, but plans can change a little bit The watch of Rabbit from the Economist cover shows 5 November (2021) but can be read as 11 May 2022 (or 11 March) as a top of all tops And Etherium leads the charge however smaller altcoins should follow with greater show (precentage). |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
February 17, 2022, 08:33:23 PM
Last edit: February 17, 2022, 09:15:14 PM by AntiNoise |
|
" https://twitter.com/0x6861746366574/status/1493130364520316928 " "When designing protocols and in particular the tokenomics of a protocol, we always seek to pay the minimum appropriate amount for economic security - otherwise we get all the issues you see with NEM today: price suppression, weak community, apathy." This is wrong. These are characteristics that occur when development is delayed for many years. Quite simply. It isn´t the fault of the NIS-SN operators or tocenomics, the majority have always represented the community. Everyone can see in the blockchain who is selling something and when. |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
February 17, 2022, 09:46:35 PM |
|
Why archive a forum when you can keep it going ?
Wouldn't networking the different channels be a better alternative ? But then it might not be so easy to control ? ....?
thx
|
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
February 19, 2022, 01:37:56 PM |
|
Why archive a forum when you can keep it going ?
Wouldn't networking the different channels be a better alternative ? But then it might not be so easy to control ? ....?
Who and where is spoken about archiving a forum? |
|
|
|
|
AntiNoise
Member
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
February 19, 2022, 02:38:14 PM |
|
Why archive a forum when you can keep it going ?
Wouldn't networking the different channels be a better alternative ? But then it might not be so easy to control ? ....?
Who and where is spoken about archiving a forum? Yes, you are right, sorry. My statement here was not 100% correct. Only a few posts with technical content should be archived. But there doesn't seem to be anyone in the community who wants to do this. According to the announcement, it should have been closed long ago. Even the person responsible for the documentation is throwing in the towel again. And there is certainly more than enough work to be done here. For whatever reason. There are enough financial resources to keep this forum going. So a lot of information is lost. In a good and bad way. Actually an absurdity. All contributions, no matter what kind, are good contemporary witnesses of the development of NEM / Symbol. They are easy to search through and you can find the relevant information relatively quickly. I don't remember anyone asking the community either. It's a decision that was made unilaterally by the core devs. Well, but NEM / Symbol now has a lot of colourful avatars and pictures. If that's nothing! |
|
|
|
|
tyz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1531
|
|
February 19, 2022, 03:22:28 PM |
|
I am concerned about the progress of NEM and Symbol. It was clear to me that not much more could be expected from XEM after the snapshot, which is why I sold all my XEM at a good price directly after the snapshot, even though these were still mainly XEM from the ICO. The fact that the disaster continues for XYM is really indicative of the project. And I have also started to slowly reduce my XYM stake. Very sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
February 19, 2022, 03:38:11 PM |
|
Why archive a forum when you can keep it going ?
Wouldn't networking the different channels be a better alternative ? But then it might not be so easy to control ? ....?
Who and where is spoken about archiving a forum? Yes, you are right, sorry. My statement here was not 100% correct. Only a few posts with technical content should be archived. But there doesn't seem to be anyone in the community who wants to do this. According to the announcement, it should have been closed long ago. Even the person responsible for the documentation is throwing in the towel again. And there is certainly more than enough work to be done here. For whatever reason. There are enough financial resources to keep this forum going. So a lot of information is lost. In a good and bad way. Actually an absurdity. All contributions, no matter what kind, are good contemporary witnesses of the development of NEM / Symbol. They are easy to search through and you can find the relevant information relatively quickly. I don't remember anyone asking the community either. It's a decision that was made unilaterally by the core devs. Well, but NEM / Symbol now has a lot of colourful avatars and pictures. If that's nothing! Do you think that the archiving should be done to some public place, e.g. https://archive.org/ or to some NEM / Symbol storage? I don't know if it is possible to save these bitcointalk.org's threads but if the amount of pages is not much, then someone could pick each page one by one and save them to PDF format. After that the PDF documents can be easily saved to anywhere as the total size would not be gigabytes. |
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
February 19, 2022, 03:49:23 PM
Last edit: February 19, 2022, 04:24:35 PM by jkoil |
|
I am concerned about the progress of NEM and Symbol. It was clear to me that not much more could be expected from XEM after the snapshot, which is why I sold all my XEM at a good price directly after the snapshot, even though these were still mainly XEM from the ICO. The fact that the disaster continues for XYM is really indicative of the project. And I have also started to slowly reduce my XYM stake. Very sad.
Currently the world economy is in such phase that the intelligent and / or careful people are digging holes. But what for the holes are digged? Either they are for enlargening them to bunkers for the coming depression or (hyper) inflation, or they are for enabling the quicker start ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starting_blocks) when trying to pick up the best fruits, when the economical situations are coming clearer. What project is making a way better progress? And is that project a social media "project" or a tech project? |
|
|
|
|
|
