Bitcoin Forum
January 22, 2019, 05:25:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 [1915]
  Print  
Author Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs  (Read 2850128 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1489


Always remember - I love you


View Profile
January 21, 2019, 08:05:38 PM
 #38281

too bad Sad
"NEM.io Foundation and NEM China Chapter never announced cooperation with WeChat or "WeChat wallet". "

well, i think that if there was a real parternship xem's price will be much higher than now...

It was much, much higher.

Until people realised it was utter hogwash.

Rather a sad basis for the biggest pump by a mile.

1548134758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548134758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1548134758
Reply with quote  #2

1548134758
Report to moderator
1548134758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548134758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1548134758
Reply with quote  #2

1548134758
Report to moderator
1548134758
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548134758

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1548134758
Reply with quote  #2

1548134758
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1236


Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io!


View Profile
Today at 02:45:03 AM
Last edit: Today at 04:00:39 AM by nutildah
 #38282

My first comment was against nutildah's "to get more stakes".

- "... some extra profiles to get some activity to the new coin - not getting stakes."

The term sockpuppet I saw first time, when the NEM stake claming started. And because there is not proven that Utopianfuture has used sockpuppets to claim stakes, then I think that he had no 'sockpuppets, just extra 'profiles'.

Don't know why you're so adamant about rewriting history.

From gentlemand's link:

Quote
I had a few sockpuppet accounts but I have no intention of cashing out any of them.

No intention of "cashing out" what exactly? DOGE?

He was obviously hoarding NEMstakes. And I don't give a shit any more but it irks me when people try to claim that things that were, weren't, or vice-versa.

A sockpuppet is an extra profile.

What you're doing is saying a square isn't a rectangle.


What do you mean by "rewriting history" ?

You are trying to rewrite it to please your own assumptions. If something is not proven, then it is not so.

Do you know what "Innocent until proven guilty" means ?


1. UtopianFuture admitted to having sockpuppet accounts
2. He admitted using those to claim NEM stakes.

These are facts. Its proven. The accused admitted it. Case closed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=649852.0


Strange that I have not seen that thread ...   (a lot of broken links there...)
maybe coz on that day I was quite busy in NEM thread Smiley
or maybe the author (CfA) was the reason to skip that Wink

The main post that I am referring is this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg7279428#msg7279428
and
yes, there utopianfuture admits that he had made "few sockpuppet accounts"
but also to have "no intention of cashing out any of them"

As an active project manager he could have got enough stakes from the DevFund's. So there has been no reason to claim stakes in behind the curtains.

You are trying to use logic for your proof in the similar way as
 A
A -> B
------------
B

but unfortunately you fail.
Your attempt is like trying to prove that 1 + 1 = 2,
but you are saying "0.5 + 0.5 ... ermh let's round it ... 1 + 1 is ... yes, it equals 2. Proved. Case closed"
Smiley


Where is the utopianfuture's statement, where he writes (which would make possible to use the verb 'admit') that he was trying to claim stakes with some extra profiles ?


What's the matter with you? UF had extra accounts. He used those accounts to claim stakes. This goes against the entire premise of NEM being "fairly distributed," so when he got caught, he "retired" from NEM. Why else do you think he would step aside from his creation?? Please, stop insulting our intelligence.

   ▄▄██████▄▄
  ████████████
███▄▄
 ██████████████▀▀▀██▄
████████████████   ▀██▄
████████████████     ▀██
██████████████       ██▌
██████████████        ▐██
██▌▀▀██████▀▀         ▐██
▐██                   ██▌
 ██▄                 ▄██
  ▀██▄             ▄██▀
    ▀██▄▄▄     ▄▄▄██▀
      ▀▀█████████▀▀





███████████████████████████
███████████▀▀         ▀▀███
████████▀   ▄▄██▄  ▀█▄  ▀██
██████▀  ▄████████▄  ▀█  ██
████▀  ▄██████▄▀  ██▄    ██
███▀  ██████▄▀  ▄▀████▄  ██
██▀  █████▄▀  ▄▀██████  ▄██
██  ▀███▄▀  ▄▀███████  ▄███
██    ▀██▄▄▀███████▀  ▄████
██  █▄  ▀████████▀  ▄██████
██▄  ▀█▄  ▀██▀▀   ▄████████
███▄▄         ▄▄███████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀       ▀▀████████
█████▀   ▄ ▀███▀ ▄   ▀█████
████  ▄████▄ ▀ ▄████▄  ████
███  ▄ ▀███▀ ▄ ▀███▀ ▄  ███
██  ▄██ ▀▀ ▄███▄ ▀▀ ██▄  ██
██  █▀ ▄█ ███████ █▄ ▀█  ██
██   ▄███▄ █████ ▄███▄   ██
███  ████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▀████  ███
████  ▀ ▄ ▀█████▀ ▄ ▀  ████
█████▄  ▀▀▄ ███ ▄▀▀  ▄█████
████████▄▄       ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████
████████     INDUSTRY LEADING BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     ████████
LIVE
STREAMING
DAILY PRICE
BOOSTS
LIVE DEALER
CASINO
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀       ▀▀████████
█████▀  ▄█▄  ▀  ▄▄   ▀█████
████  ▄  ▀    ▀█████▄  ████
███  ▀█▀   ▀█▄   ▀▀██▄  ███
██  ▄    █▄  ▀██▄▄  ▀█▄  ██
██  █▀ ▄  ▀█▄  ▀███▄  ▀  ██
██    ▄██  ▀██▄  ▀███▄   ██
███  ▀████  ▀███▄  ▀█▀  ███
████  ▀████  ▀████▄    ████
█████▄   ▀▀█▄  ▀▀▀   ▄█████
████████▄▄       ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █████ ▀▀████████
█████▀    ▄█████▄    ▀█████
██████▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄██████
███▀███▀ ▄███▀███▄ ▀███▀███
██   █ ▄██▀     ▀██▄ █   ██
██   █ ██         ██ █   ██
██   █ ▀██▄▄█ █▄▄██▀ █   ██
███▄███▄ ▀██▄▄▄██▀ ▄███▄███
██████▀▀█▄▄ ▀▀▀ ▄▄█▀▀██████
█████▄    ▀█████▀    ▄█████
████████▄▄ █████ ▄▄████████
███████████████████████████





..WIN WITH US!..
Pages: « 1 ... 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 [1915]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!