[ANN] .0014 BTC per GH/s - 12 month contract **www.BitcoinCloudServices.com**

[odlal]

Hi btccloudservices,

I hope you can clear something up for me

Are BitcoinCloudServices in any way connected with Lunamine  ?

The reason I ask is because I was back-tracking my recent Payout from Lunamine and it seems as though one of your wallets paid some BTC into a wallet which was then used by Lunamine in their payouts !

BtcCloudServices have this wallet : https://blockchain.info/address/1BTCPayb5AdF8fSsR7oews2PpuVpRtamk6

which has paid many times into : https://blockchain.info/address/16XR452HG58Yc2cQPiC1C8PCc9ysp5iq6q

one of which was THE FIRST PAYMENT on the 31st July of 0.075 BTC into : https://blockchain.info/address/1MDkF5KeYwSzZZQZ5kgfjgadMXbALm58Fn

which Lunamine then paid some of into MY wallet on the 4th August with this Transaction  : https://blockchain.info/tx/37213268d61f21a1b6a42bd996a93b528c4247732af814a64c2ce82ec47ff14c

Hence it does look like BitCoinCloudServices has had something to do with the setting up of at least one of Lunamine's payout Wallets ? Of course this could be a 100% Business Transaction but I'd appreciate it if you could shed some light on this matter please !

Thanks very much,
Odlal.

Hi Odlal.

We are not connected to them in any way and apart from 1BTCPayb5AdF8fSsR7oews2PpuVpRtamk6 we don't control any of the address that you mention.

16XR452HG58Yc2cQPiC1C8PCc9ysp5iq6q is controlled by one of our customers, there is a possibility  that this customer placed an order with them and eventually you were paid from these customer's funds.

You can see that this address 16XR452HG58Yc2cQPiC1C8PCc9ysp5iq6q is included everyday in our payouts but I'm afraid I can't disclose information more  about this costumer.

Hey thanks for the quick reply ! There's the possibility then that Lunamine is the customer of yours who's using 16XR452HG58Yc2cQPiC1C8PCc9ysp5iq6q !  

You may not be aware of it (?) but it does look that way to me !

[btccloudservices]

We control our payouts but after payout we can't control where a customer spends his/her  BTC 

[btccloudservices]

Check out this article in CRYPTO MINING BLOG

http://cryptomining-blog.com/3258-btc-and-ltc-cloud-mining-services-current-price-comparison/

[Ritch]

Check out this article in CRYPTO MINING BLOG

http://cryptomining-blog.com/3258-btc-and-ltc-cloud-mining-services-current-price-comparison/

And do not forget: Cryptsy MN1/2: 0.008 BTC/GHS. The price has been mostly stable over a long time and MN1/2 is usable as a shorttime "Parkposition" without a minimum input nor contracts. Beginner-friendly for those who would like to test cloud-shares and trade with them. (I use MN1/2 to park incomes from Bit- and Dogecoin games and buy IXC from dayly output to feed CEX.)

Of course BCS earned first place in the list above because of the low price and on-time payments without transfer fees. A dayly output is nice, but a weekly would destroy the ability of daytrading. An user-ability to change the outputadress without contacting the support would be nice, because the BTC-price is different on trading-platforms. The ability to buy/sell "old contracts" from user to user would be nice, too, and BCS could earn some trading fees (like CEX) with an internal marketplace.

best regards,
Ritch [user: "Negromonga"]<- very satisfied with BCS

[btccloudservices]

We are Out of Stock

New hardware will arrive shortly and we'll begin to take orders then.

We don't believe in preorders and we won't oversell.

[btccloudservices]

Today's payout was was made around 0:00 UTC

http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/5a409788e3ba52319b3b7cf7592dbbb0b3ef2f8c1bf705fd1814e81e279454d1

But the transaction has not been confirmed.

We'll monitor this transaction and if it's invalidated by the network we'll resubmit it.

[btccloudservices]

Weird!

I just posted and minutes later the transaction gets confirmed.


https://blockchain.info/tx/5a409788e3ba52319b3b7cf7592dbbb0b3ef2f8c1bf705fd1814e81e279454d1

[Mike18feb]

I know, I received one payment last night and nothing more when I went to bed. But today all payments from the exact same time are there. Different blocks for confirmations... but that doesn't explain why the payments were not visible. If someone can explain how this should be seen, the please. I'm all for better understanding

[Mike18feb]

I know, I received one payment last night and nothing more when I went to bed. But today all payments from the exact same time are there. Different blocks for confirmations... but that doesn't explain why the payments were not visible. If someone can explain how this should be seen, the please. I'm all for better understanding

heh, I need to wake up. I was looking at yesterday's payments

All I see is one payment for one contract indeed:
http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/5a409788e3ba52319b3b7cf7592dbbb0b3ef2f8c1bf705fd1814e81e279454d1

But no payments for the other contracts.

[Mike18feb]

I'm on a roll here, but did you change payments? From the 15th on I get one payment for all contracts. Before that it used to be one payment for each contract. Not that I mind, but it got me confused.

[btccloudservices]

Hi.

Yes, from now on it's going to be one output per address.

[Ritch]

*lets sing* "Oh Lord, would you buy me a BTC online Pizza - the BTC price is down, so the purchase must be low."
Ok, joking aside ... and now my personal BCS-facts, the world is waiting for:

07.07 - 17.08. / 38,949% ROR / 0,95% average per day

That's fine! (My local Bankmanager would get a heart attack, if I would ask him for that interests.  )

Old fart advice: Sure you could earn much more with real HYIPS, but you should not do that because of the risk to lose all! It's much better to split and invest in good plans like BCS or CEX and use the C*******s wise. 

best regards

[greyfoxsylux]

Hi.

Yes, from now on it's going to be one output per address.

I can confirm this, and I'm quite glad it's done like this. It would suck to be flooded with incoming transactions every day or every week coming from one source. I'm glad this is done.

Also can't wait for hardware to arrive. I'm ready to get another contract going!

[Mike18feb]

I was about to wonder when the new hardware would be available.

But... what I also wonder about, the minimum Ghs amount has changed again. Now 50 Ghs. The why of an increase I can imagine, but what is the number based on? Why is it 50 and not 25, or 35? What's the thought behind the minimum amount?

[silverthornne]

New offer but still can't buy. I do notice that the total hashrate went from 292 THS to 297 THS so did you get an extra 5 THS that was purchased instantly?

[btccloudservices]

Hi.

Probably you are viewing our cached homepage, we've been receiving orders.

https://www.bitcoincloudservices.com/product/bitcoin-cloud-mining-contract/

[silverthornne]

Hi.

Probably you are viewing our cached homepage, we've been receiving orders.

https://www.bitcoincloudservices.com/product/bitcoin-cloud-mining-contract/

That was the problem. Ctrl + F5 fixed it!

[duffles]

Hey peeps,

I've just received my 49th payment from BCS and thought I'd share the chart I use to keep track of earnings:

(Disclosure: clicking the chart will take you to BCS using my referral link )

http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l21/mattduffin/chart_zps8543393f.png

It all looks pretty healthy. Payouts only get new labels if the amount changed from last time. So you can see that there are 11, 13, 9, etc. days with the same amount. The percentage payback line jumps occasionally because BCS sometimes pays out twice in the same day and then not at all on other days.

47% payback after 49 days of a 365 day contract seems pretty good to me, although it won't be linear due to payout amounts decreasing.

You can verify this at https://blockchain.info/address/17a5jMgVGXVpuGfvVbDFUppL4jwt5WpRXt?offset=0&filter=2 (ignore the payments from Bit-investors, that was me being taken in by silvercane's scam!).

[Ritch]

Exact math, duffles ... but the contract is 5 Years, not only 356 Days. (?)
So long all my dayly payouts were in time.

best regards

[Netwerked]

Hey peeps,

I've just received my 49th payment from BCS and thought I'd share the chart I use to keep track of earnings:
...
47% payback after 49 days of a 365 day contract seems pretty good to me, although it won't be linear due to payout amounts decreasing.

Duffles, I've verified your math.  I get 46.46%, but you're using actual payouts and I'm using theoretical numbers.  In any case, we're only about a half percent off, and your real numbers are better than theoretical ones.

Whether you break even or not all depends on how rapidly the difficulty increases.  The spreadsheet that I use to keep track of profits shows that you will probably break even and get an additional 2-3% profit.  I purchased a mining contract on July 27th with the same terms, but I may only get 94% back (I lose 6%).  This assumes that we'll repeat roughly the same difficulty increases experienced so far this year.

The difficulty is almost 24 billion now, and I'm guesstimating that we'll be at about 120 billion on January 1st.  I hope difficulty won't be that high.  It all depends on the amount of new, efficient mining equipment put into production over the next 4 months.  We were at 3.8 billion at the beginning of March, and then 18.7 billion exactly 5 months later.