An excellent read about possible alternative futures, and the psychological control methods of capitalism. This article is so good it has earned a place alongside Voltaire in my signature.
Excerpts:
"One aspect of every phase’s dominant affect is that it is a public secret, something that everyone knows, but nobody admits, or talks about. As long as the dominant affect is a public secret, it remains effective, and strategies against it will not emerge.
Public secrets are typically personalised. The problem is only visible at an individual, psychological level; the social causes of the problem are concealed. Each phase blames the system’s victims for the suffering that the system causes.
And it portrays a fundamental part of its functional logic as a contingent and localised problem."
--
"When misery stopped working as a control strategy, capitalism switched to boredom. In the mid twentieth century, the dominant public narrative was that the standard of living – which widened access to consumption, healthcare and education – was rising. Everyone in the rich countries was happy, and the poor countries were on their way to development. The public secret was that everyone was bored. This was an effect of the Fordist system which was prevalent until the 1980s – a system based on full-time jobs for life, guaranteed welfare, mass consumerism, mass culture, and the co-optation of the labour movement which had been built to fight misery. Job security and welfare provision reduced anxiety and misery, but jobs were boring, made up of simple, repetitive tasks."
“We do not want a world in which the guarantee that we will not die of starvation is bought by accepting the risk of dying of boredom”
-The Situationists
"The mid-century reorientation from misery to boredom was crucial to the emergence of a new wave of revolt. We are the tail end of this wave. Just as the tactics of the first wave still work when fighting misery, so the tactics of the second wave still work when fighting boredom. The difficulty is that we are less often facing boredom as the main enemy. This is why militant resistance is caught in its current impasse."
---
Consumption culture has largely solved the problem of boredom by replacing it with near-constant distraction. Look down at your smartphone, dear American worker. Check your facebook. Engage your digital fantasy world, don't think about your real life.
Another excerpt will serve to elaborate:
"
New products, such as video-games and social media, involve heightened levels of active individual involvement and desocialised stimulation. Workplace experiences are diversified by means of micro-differentials and performance management, as well as the multiplication of casual and semi-self-employed work situations on the margins of capitalism. (...) Capitalism has encouraged the growth of
mediatised secondary identities – the self portrayed through social media, visible consumption, and lifelong learning – which have to be obsessively maintained. "
Capitalism is an extremely adaptive virus. It lives inside your brain, and the brains of everyone you know. There it thrives on your ignorance, your inability to honestly face your own suffering and trace it back to its roots. And it is malignant as fuck, destroying you from the inside out.
In contemporary capitalism, the dominant reactive affect is anxiety."Today’s public secret is that everyone is anxious. Anxiety has spread from its previous localised locations (such as sexuality) to the whole of the social field. All forms of intensity, self-expression, emotional connection, immediacy, and enjoyment are now laced with anxiety. It has become the linchpin of subordination. One major part of the social underpinning of anxiety is the multi-faceted omnipresent web of surveillance. The NSA, CCTV, performance management reviews, the Job Centre, the privileges system in the prisons, the constant examination and classification of the youngest schoolchildren. But this obvious web is only the outer carapace."
"We need to think about how people’s deliberate and ostensibly voluntary self-exposure, through social media, visible consumption and choice of positions within the field of opinions, also assumes a performance in the field of
the perpetual gaze of virtual others (back to social media). We need to think about the ways in which this gaze inflects how we find,
measure and know one another, as co-actors in an infinitely watched perpetual performance.
Our success in this performance in turn affects everything from our ability to access human warmth to our ability to access means of subsistence, not just in the form of the wage but also in the form of credit. Outsides to the field of mediatised surveillance are increasingly closed off, as public space is bureaucratised and privatised, and a widening range of human activity is criminalised on the grounds of risk, security, nuisance, quality of life, or anti-social behaviour."
Think for a moment of the suffering experienced when you lose a job - you not only lose a vital source of income (=survival), you often also have long-standing social relationships mercilessly severed. To say nothing of the stigmatization and shame one feels in relation to one's peers!"
"Since everyone is disposable, the system holds the threat of
forcibly delinking anyone at any time, in a context where alternatives are foreclosed in advance, so that forcible delinking entails desocialisation – leading to an absurd non-choice between desocialised inclusion and desocialised exclusion. This threat is manifested in small ways in today’s disciplinary practices – from “time-outs” and Internet bans, to firings and benefit sanctions – culminating in the draconian forms of solitary confinement found in prisons."
"The present dominant affect of anxiety is also known as precarity. Precarity is a type of insecurity which treats people as disposable so as to impose control. Precarity differs from misery in that the necessities of life are not simply absent. They are available, but withheld conditionally."
I hold that no human being is disposable. The wealthiest money-producers and the least able to produce any quantifiable value for society - are and must be equally precious, equally priceless, in a society that values life over money."Precarity leads to generalised hopelessness; a constant bodily excitation without release. Growing proportions of young people are living at home. Substantial portions of the population – over 10% in the UK – are taking antidepressants. The birth rate is declining, as insecurity makes people reluctant to start families. In Japan, millions of young people never leave their homes (the hikikomori), while others literally work themselves to death on an epidemic scale. Surveys reveal half the population of the UK are experiencing income insecurity. Economically, aspects of the system of anxiety include “lean” production, financialisation and resultant debt slavery, rapid communication and financial outflows, and the globalisation of production."
If you find yourself in NYC, and you ever want to horrify yourself, pay a visit to any of NYC's HRA Foodstamp application centers. Take a gander at the hours-long lines and compare them in your mind to the food lines of the Great Depression:
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.politico.com%2Fglobal%2Fnews%2F090210_depression_miller.jpg&t=665&c=oQosiO77glFFYQ)
"Many more discourses of scapegoating and criminalisation treat precarity as a matter of personal deviance, irresponsibility, or pathological self-exclusion. Many of these discourses seek to maintain the superstructure of Fordism (nationalism, social integration) without its infrastructure (a national economy, welfare, jobs for all). Doctrines of individual responsibility are central to this backlash, reinforcing vulnerability and disposability. Then there’s the self-esteem industry, the massive outpouring of media telling people how to achieve success through positive thinking – as if the sources of anxiety and frustration are simply illusory. These are indicative of the tendency to privatise problems, both those relating to work, and those relating to psychology."
Related:
Bruce Levine - The Rebel YellCurrent tactics and theories aren’t working. We need new tactics and theories to combat anxiety.
"If the first wave provided a machine for fighting misery, and the second wave a machine for fighting boredom, what we now need is a machine for fighting anxiety – and
this is something we do not yet have." <<< Enter Bitcoin and its offering of potential financial liberty
"Current militant resistance does not and cannot combat anxiety. It often involves deliberate exposure to high-anxiety situations. Insurrectionists overcome anxiety by turning negative affects into anger, and acting on this anger through a projectile affect of attack. In many ways, this provides an alternative to anxiety. However, it is difficult for people to pass from anxiety to anger, and it is easy for people to be pushed back the other way, due to trauma. We’ve noticed a certain tendency for insurrectionists to refuse to take seriously the existence of psychological barriers to militant action. Their response tends to be, “Just do it!” But anxiety is a real, material force – not simply a spook."