[ANN] [BBL] BitBlock-World's first X15 coin|Bittrex|Poloniex|Mandatory Update

[reflector]

http://www.hashharder.com/x15/bitblock

That's a pretty cool graphic.

[TheCoinFinder]

Thanks.

Btw -

http://explorer.bitblock.ml/block/00000000003bb17cde5e3fa35419e794f48b7065f7529589d0887f8c6ddbf768

Seems to be wrong?

Code:

{
    "amount" : 0.00000000,
    "confirmations" : 7,
    "generated" : true,
    "blockhash" : "00000000003bb17cde5e3fa35419e794f48b7065f7529589d0887f8c6ddbf768",
    "blockindex" : 0,
    "blocktime" : 1403894465,
    "txid" : "7b5a9cf3d5bf42b627d396fa5a46b1e1e97e2e4b89761b5a2eb15b1abd4845ee",
    "time" : 1403894465,
    "timereceived" : 1403894517,
    "details" : [
        {
            "account" : "",
            "address" : "Xf9Bt4QUSyTHNbCLqNBS28EZFLF14ZZN7A",
            "category" : "immature",
            "amount" : 25.04900000
        }
    ]
}

is the real one.
The block Explorer seems to be messing up the addresses?

[go6ooo1212]

And it seems there is no answer about the Darkcoin logo into the BBL wallet tray icon ?

[Perl++]

And it seems there is no answer about the Darkcoin logo into the BBL wallet tray icon ?

I already told you darkcoin was using the goldcoin logo too.... now darkcoin is the best anon coin.

[baraba80]

And it seems there is no answer about the Darkcoin logo into the BBL wallet tray icon ?

Read between the lines, this is DRK 2.0! just w8!  

[huadaonan]

[/opt/X15GPU]:# sh autogen.sh
aclocal: couldn't open directory `m4': No such file or directory
autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 1

Fixed ... plz redownload from git

funny thing ... i'm pretty bad at linux, it took me more time than fixing the bitblockold kernel

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

[daemonfox]

[/opt/X15GPU]:# sh autogen.sh
aclocal: couldn't open directory `m4': No such file or directory
autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 1

Fixed ... plz redownload from git

funny thing ... i'm pretty bad at linux, it took me more time than fixing the bitblockold kernel

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

Start it with all your settings in a command line... then when it hashes... S for settings and export the conf file. Then you can see what it shows for kernel.

Actually... my export doesn't even show a kernel: line... and im mining fine since the GPU miner was launched AND on the newer version posted.

[aznboy84]

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

use "algorithm" : "bitblock" instead ....

[TheCoinFinder]

[djm34]

may be 3 dices showing triple 5 ?

[asemov]

http://BBL.HASHLINK.EU
Need some hash power, help us find some blocks!

- 1% Fee on all pools
- PROP Payout system
- Dedicated Servers
- Multicoin Pool
- High performance NODE.js backend
- User friendly MPOS interface
- STRATUM
- VARDIFF
- Skilled admins
- Forum and IRC Support

[louiseth1]

http://suchpool.pw/bbl

Come mine where your hashing statistics are actually correct! We need more miners aboard, jump in with the early guys!

If you have any comment or issue, we are always here to help. Drop by irc or open a ticket, somebody will be there to answer you shortly.


1 account and 1 set of workers for all pools on our new interface
Multiple Load-Balanced Node.JS Stratums + VARDIFF
24/7 Monitoring on Stratum, MPOS, Central Wallet, Mysql and much more
Helpdesk Support System, Active team
DDoS Protected and Flood filtered
10 Dedicated Servers in Cluster
Professionnal infrastructure build with scalability in mind with our own servers
Multiple databases and frequent full database dumps
Hosted in a state of the art Datacenter using n+1
Best bandwidth carriers, excellent connectivity and latency worldwide
We also have our own on-site tech support, since we are the hosters.

We recently implemented single login across all our new pools. We are also migrating some of our old pools on the platform aswell.
Come see and benefit from our improved front-end and stronger back-end architecture!

1 account and 1 set of workers for all pools on our new interface, Multiple load balanced stratums, 24/7 monitoring, all the same features as our other pools.

http://suchpool.pw/bbl
To reach us:

    URL: http://www.suchpool.pw
    Email: admin@suchpool.pw
    IRC: irc.freenode.net - #suchpool
    Twitter: @SuchPool
    Support: Support.SuchPool.pw

[platinum4]

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

use "algorithm" : "bitblock" instead ....

aznboy84, getting a report in from ystarnaud at sgminer-dec/sgminer

You need to do a pull request and specify the sgminer_v5 tree instead of the master tree.  Even though master was pushed up into v5, you're asking it compare against an incorrect tree.

Thanks again if you can close the old pull request and open a new one pointed specifically at the v5_0 tree branch.  You may need to select "compare across forks" in the pull request option.

Edit, since your pull is trying to compare master against v5_0, inherently it is already "behind" compared to the modded pre-release-06-25-2014 you have modded and dropped on us

EDIT 2: Big thanks on closing issue 293 buddy, looking forward to when you get the new pull committed shortly.

[hearnomore]

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

use "algorithm" : "bitblock" instead ....

aznboy84, getting a report in from ystarnaud at sgminer-dec/sgminer

You need to do a pull request and specify the sgminer_v5 tree instead of the master tree.  Even though master was pushed up into v5, you're asking it compare against an incorrect tree.

Thanks again if you can close the old pull request and open a new one pointed specifically at the v5_0 tree branch.  You may need to select "compare across forks" in the pull request option.

Edit, since your pull is trying to compare master against v5_0, inherently it is already "behind" compared to the modded pre-release-06-25-2014 you have modded and dropped on us

EDIT 2: Big thanks on closing issue 293 buddy, looking forward to when you get the new pull committed shortly.

Anymore with this... Would like to throw my 7870's on this, but the modded sgminer doesn't work.

[platinum4]

how should we set the kernel option. kernel:"bitblock" ? i try it with suprvno.cc pool but it's show all reject share on it

use "algorithm" : "bitblock" instead ....

aznboy84, getting a report in from ystarnaud at sgminer-dec/sgminer

You need to do a pull request and specify the sgminer_v5 tree instead of the master tree.  Even though master was pushed up into v5, you're asking it compare against an incorrect tree.

Thanks again if you can close the old pull request and open a new one pointed specifically at the v5_0 tree branch.  You may need to select "compare across forks" in the pull request option.

Edit, since your pull is trying to compare master against v5_0, inherently it is already "behind" compared to the modded pre-release-06-25-2014 you have modded and dropped on us

We're getting there I think, but I don't think aznboy84 forked off that v5_0 tree, his was a local upload so it won't compare across to sgminer-dev/sgminer.  He may need to re-fork and add in his bitblock.cl additions like he did with his local upload.  That may be what he's doing now, haven't heard from him in an hour or two.

EDIT 2: Big thanks on closing issue 293 buddy, looking forward to when you get the new pull committed shortly.

Anymore with this... Would like to throw my 7870's on this, but the modded sgminer doesn't work.

Looks like aznboy84 just submitted another pull request 294, we'll see how fast we can get it into the multi-algo with newest commits.  About 20 commits already been newer than the 06/25 build.

MUCH APPRECIATED aznboy84

[aznboy84]

Anymore with this... Would like to throw my 7870's on this, but the modded sgminer doesn't work.

Use bitblockold kernel instead of bitblock ...

aznboy84, getting a report in from ystarnaud at sgminer-dec/sgminer

You need to do a pull request and specify the sgminer_v5 tree instead of the master tree.  Even though master was pushed up into v5, you're asking it compare against an incorrect tree.

Thanks again if you can close the old pull request and open a new one pointed specifically at the v5_0 tree branch.  You may need to select "compare across forks" in the pull request option.

Edit, since your pull is trying to compare master against v5_0, inherently it is already "behind" compared to the modded pre-release-06-25-2014 you have modded and dropped on us

EDIT 2: Big thanks on closing issue 293 buddy, looking forward to when you get the new pull committed shortly.

Done i guess ... it's way more harder than coding
First day on github and i had to do this lol

[platinum4]

aznboy84, getting a report in from ystarnaud at sgminer-dec/sgminer

You need to do a pull request and specify the sgminer_v5 tree instead of the master tree.  Even though master was pushed up into v5, you're asking it compare against an incorrect tree.

Thanks again if you can close the old pull request and open a new one pointed specifically at the v5_0 tree branch.  You may need to select "compare across forks" in the pull request option.

Edit, since your pull is trying to compare master against v5_0, inherently it is already "behind" compared to the modded pre-release-06-25-2014 you have modded and dropped on us

EDIT 2: Big thanks on closing issue 293 buddy, looking forward to when you get the new pull committed shortly.

Done i guess ... it's way more harder than coding
First day on github and i had to do this lol

No shit, I'm with you on that.  It's one thing to be able to code, a whole thing entirely to have to deal with the versioning system on github.

You da man, I'm gonna bug the fuck outta the devs to push that shit in pronto.

[zmeddy]

And it seems there is no answer about the Darkcoin logo into the BBL wallet tray icon ?

Read between the lines, this is DRK 2.0! just w8!  

Exactly, it's DRK 2.0 in at least 1 aspect:

With an even faster instamine 1.8m in 18 hours.
The next 1,8m coins at current block reward (25) will take 125 days.

Interpretation of these facts is up to every individual of course : )

[damiano]

Other than this being the first x15 what else is going for it?

[ajeef]

bbl to the moon.now so cheap 12000sats