Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 03:40:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW  (Read 182558 times)
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 11:48:31 AM
 #1721

I tried that but i dont know how to get it to work/mine with cpu.

I help move block by mining on low intensity with gpu which shoots my cpu usage to 50-60%.. Sad

Anyways good luck to you as i can't even connect to the network anymore, if you get it working post a node so i can sync up Smiley

thx

Networks been down for me too but your gpu is normally to shoot up to 50/60 because its 'mining'

I have no CPU usage while GPU mining.
1715010041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715010041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715010041
Reply with quote  #2

1715010041
Report to moderator
1715010041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715010041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715010041
Reply with quote  #2

1715010041
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715010041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715010041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715010041
Reply with quote  #2

1715010041
Report to moderator
balwind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 05:54:45 PM
 #1722

cpu usage is around 3-6% if its mining at normal intensity (16-18)  for a 7950 at 9mh+ ( 50-60 gpu watts usage based on gpu-z), but if i lower the intensity to 9 or 10 its hashes at 0.9mh ( 15-25 gpu watts usage based on gpu-z ) with cpu usage shooting up to 50-60% usage on a intel g2020 dual core.

Are those 4 nodes on the official blockchain ? i don't know if there is a fork but i rather not start on 1 or start mining and create a fork instead. I don't really understand these things. I don't know why my wallet stop synced up to the blockchain.

If im not synced up to anyone and start mining  and if someone else who is also not synced start mining aswell, do we both create a different chain ? fork ? or we will be connected to each other

Sorry i'm a noob when it comes to these things.

Thank you kindly for your time. Smiley
penambang
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 548
Merit: 501


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2015, 07:21:00 PM
 #1723

Code:
[
{
"addr" : "176.9.26.47:22871",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1441912677,
"lastrecv" : 1441912665,
"bytessent" : 1510,
"bytesrecv" : 20748,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1441912663,
"version" : 72002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 501213,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "89.190.195.82:63072",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1441912676,
"lastrecv" : 1441912676,
"bytessent" : 20787,
"bytesrecv" : 229,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1441912675,
"version" : 72002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 501213,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "37.59.27.14:33754",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1441912688,
"lastrecv" : 1441912688,
"bytessent" : 20787,
"bytesrecv" : 360,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"conntime" : 1441912687,
"version" : 72002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 501213,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

last block was the same with block explorer so I assume this is valid node
balwind
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2015, 11:00:57 AM
 #1724

Didnt know there was a block explorer.

Anyways when clicking on the block explorer link you provide my pc/firefox blocked it as untrusted connection so i guess i'm not gonna click it




penambang
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 548
Merit: 501


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2015, 11:33:33 AM
 #1725

Didnt know there was a block explorer.

Anyways when clicking on the block explorer link you provide my pc/firefox blocked it as untrusted connection so i guess i'm not gonna click it



I think it's because their SSL certificate not from trusted provider (self-generated cert?)
gjhiggins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2015, 11:40:17 AM
 #1726

Anyways when clicking on the block explorer link you provide my pc/firefox blocked it as untrusted connection so i guess i'm not gonna click it

I think it's because their SSL certificate not from trusted provider (self-generated cert?)

Spot on.

@balwind, it's up to you ... it is a self-signed SSL cert, CA cert, DYOR: archive.org


Cheers

Graham
penambang
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 548
Merit: 501


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2015, 11:47:27 AM
 #1727

@gjhiggins You can get free SSL from WoSign, it's trusted by browser.
I use it on https://tipschain.xyz  Grin
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2015, 02:22:50 PM
 #1728

Any news on exchange?

No, no exchange unless we overpass the crisis with no mining power.
Would you like an exchange to add the coin and to delist it next day due to the lack of transaction confirmations?
DCN needs to be technically reliable first and then you can think about the exchanges/value.
penambang
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 548
Merit: 501


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2015, 07:06:31 PM
Last edit: September 18, 2015, 09:55:06 AM by penambang
 #1729

Ok guys, I've made new block explorer based on iquidus
check it here: DCN Block Explorer
currently not fully synced to blockchain, quite slow because its using RPC  Grin

PS: look at Difficulty  Shocked
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 14, 2015, 09:53:42 PM
 #1730

I think deepcoin.biz could give up htpps certificate if it cant' maintain it properly. Wrong (outdated) certificate and related browser message scares people off.
Deepcoinbiz (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
October 20, 2015, 01:47:20 AM
 #1731

I fixed what I could.
platinum4
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 26, 2015, 05:37:10 AM
 #1732

I was bored, attempting to solo mine this, but all I get is 100% rejects and it sets the share difficulty to 4.  I have a fully synchronized wallet and yes it is running.

I am hashing just fine yet all shares are rejected I would think with such low difficulty, it shouldn't matter.
loveys
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 399
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 06:54:10 AM
 #1733

where can trade?

waves



           ▄▄▄       ▄▄▄▄
         ▄█████▄   ▄██████▄
       ▄████████ ▄██████████▄
     ▄████████▀▄██████████████▄
   ▄████████▀▄████▀▄▄▄▀█████████▄
 ▄█████████ ████▀▄█████▄▀█████████▄
████████████▄▀▀▄█████████▄▀█████████
 ▀██████▀▄▄ ▀████████▄▀████▄▀█████▀
   ▀██▀▄████  ▀███▄▀███▄▀████▄▀█▀
     ▄████▀▄██▄ ▀███▄▀███▄▀██▀
      ▀█▀▄████▀▄▄ ▀███▄▀███▄
        ▀███▀▄████  ▀███▄▀▀
          ▀▄████▀▄██▄ ▀█▀
            ▀█▀▄████▀
              ▀███▀
.SMART.........
.CONTRACT..
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




   ███████████████  ██▄
   ██           ██   ▀██
   ██           ██     ██
   ██           ██ ▐██████▌
   ██           ██ ▐█ ████▌
   ███████████████  ██ ███▌
   ███████▀███████   █████
   █████▀   ▀█████      █
   ███▀       ▀███      █
   ██▄         ▄██      █
   ████▄     ▄█████▄    █
   ██████▄ ▄██████ █    █
   ███████████████ ▀▄▄▄▄▀
   ███████████████
████████████████████
.NO....
.GAS..
▬▬▬▬▬




HIGH   
        SPEED




.MULTI-SIG WALLETS..
.ATOMIC SWAPS...........
.VOTINGS......................




.FREEZING......
.DAPPS AND....
.EVEN MORE...
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 26, 2016, 09:17:56 AM
 #1734

Anyone interested in this coin?
ropyu1978
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 510


View Profile
March 18, 2016, 02:33:30 AM
 #1735

DEAD Angry
marada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 16, 2016, 08:19:31 PM
 #1736

Hello Guys and Girls.
If you want Deepcoin to get back alive, please tell me what are the nodes, what happened to seednode function or let me know your nodes directly.
What I do is to move the blockchain forward. I am the only one miner now. You want the deepcoin to hold any value, you need to answer the simple question: either you get a bit more involved or our efforts are lost forever. Your choice.
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 500


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2016, 04:15:58 PM
 #1737

What are the chances this coin can be resurrected?

Validity.Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain with the Validity SmartChain!
Website | BTCT Thread
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 500


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
August 10, 2016, 04:30:26 PM
 #1738

Site is still up. Just needs to be updated (along with domain registration) with proper download links. Nodes need to be re-activated. Etc, etc.

http://xwebhosting.org/deepcoin


Validity.Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain with the Validity SmartChain!
Website | BTCT Thread
Goldshredder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 11, 2016, 07:40:01 AM
 #1739

Shame DCN didn't get on Poloniex last year. None of the other exchanges turned out to be worth much.
Goldshredder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 12, 2016, 03:34:39 AM
 #1740

In thinking further... it seems clear that we need to form a group of committed individuals and get a private chat or something going, so that we can actually get things done here. Otherwise nothing is going to happen, if we rely upon one post per month in a bct thread. I'd be in, at least for some initial shared brainstorming and ideas as to if/how to move forward. Anyone else?

If we can get a handful of us in agreement then we can look at starting a channel or something.
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!