Signature Question

[marlboro.gold]

how have Signature link image ? pls member tell me here . thanks for watching !

[ProudMiner]

You cannot have an image in your signature, it is not allowed.

[marlboro.gold]

oh . thanks for you comment   

[kuusj98]

For the record, not allowed on any rank, not Sr. member, not Hero member.

You can have coloured text at some point I beleve (well I have it in my sig and i'm a SR. member... Hmm)

[Zebra]

Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0

[theymos]

Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0

Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it...

There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.

I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all.

[RoadStress]

Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0

Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it...

There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.

I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all.

/joke on

So you can do your own stuffing

/joke off

[coinbroker]

- Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 40 characters.
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 100 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed

hope this helps.

[jambola2]

Just a side note, once upon a time (before Nov 2011), signature images are allowed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51077.0

Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it...

There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.

I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all.

Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ?
I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers.

[theymos]

Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ?
I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers.

Signature images would still be way too distracting/messy, and the problems with paid signatures would become much worse.