...
- Despite multiple opportunities, he did not deny questions whether he gets paid for trolling. So if this is true, this opens up the possibility that this is a paid troll to deliberately interfere with many investment offerings (= IMO this is spamming with commercial interest).
...
While making accusations that my posts are financially motivated, it is important not to forget your own motivation--making money by selling shares in your scheme.
(= IMO this is
spamming conning with commercial interest).
I called Active Mining (which never traded on Havelock, but nonetheless cost its investors and customers millions) a scam. In apparent agreement, Missouri Securities Department V& and B& the illustrious Mr. Slaughter.
Some of the other "investment offerings" predicted to cause sobbing and snot:
NeoBee (which has traded on Havelock), MintSpare (ditto), HashFast (which has not) BitFunder (which also has not), UkyoLoan (ditto), CoinReturn (Crypto::Stocks), to name just a few.
So yeah, some may now be wishing that I "interfered" a bit harder.
Again,
...
I've been accused of being Mircea Popescu (Romanian exchange owner), Eduardo de Castro (HashFast), crumbs (of Active Mining fame), MikeMikeMike and Puppet (PETA), and countless other bogeymen.
If it helps you to think me any or all of the above, or that I'm being paid for my posts, I won't ruin it for you. Makes you that much more amusing to deal with.
ty
@bitcoin.newsfeed: Thanks, weren't you once accused of being crumbs?
*If you wish to learn more about Havelock "investment offerings," here's a handy TL;DR:
Havelock Securities At A Glance: The SRS BZNZ Edition