Should Notlambchop/Crumbs be re-banned?

[jimmothy]

Sure being massively annoying and trolling is not against the rules (as far as I know) but I am sure there has to be some rules broken like spamming memes/childish insults, distracting/detracting from literally every thread he posts in, alt accounts to avoid ban (he previously went by "crumbs")

Here's a list of known alt accounts:

-Crumbs
-Notlambchop
-IPO magic
-Sporket
-Ask Ken About Love
-theMiracle

Here's his main account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263109

Between the accounts there is a total of ~5000 posts and not a single one of them says something nice.

Anyways, just curious if anyone else finds him as annoying as me.

[LeanSixSigma]

Anyways, just curious if anyone else finds him as annoying as me.

Sure, I can only fully agree on this one and add another alt account:

- Ask Ken About Love

Would be great if you could update your post and add this to your list. Thanks! I will provide more alt accounts if I come across those and others are welcome to do the same.

Key 'features' of him:

- Using alt accounts in alternating order in multiple posts within the same thread to deliberately create the false illusion of real multiple posters having the same message.

- Predominantly frequenting the Securities section in Marketplace and attacking investment proposals, incl. Havelock in general.

- Despite multiple opportunities, he did not deny questions whether he gets paid for trolling. So if this is true, this opens up the possibility that this is a paid troll to deliberately interfere with many investment offerings (= IMO this is spamming with commercial interest).

- As mentioned, his posts are often not of any value, divert from key topics going OT, insults people, and tries to discredit other posters but has never posted anything about his own expertise/credibility.

- Makes wild and unfounded claims without any sources to substantiate.

- Likes to post colored cartoon horses or unicorns

***

I am strongly supporting jimmothy's suggestion to ban his account and proven alt accounts.

Until a ban can be achieved, one possibility is to simply add the link to this thread as reply to his troll posts. This way, all other readers in various threads have the opportunity to make up their own mind with info supplied here and question his credibility. It could become like some kind of DOS defense, where the effort to dispel his trolling activity will be minimized for frequent and relatively low effort repetition from our side.

[Bicknellski]

He has certainly proven that the DTM team is professional.

Is he not worth it to have around as a foil for pushing professionals to answer in more detail (wasting their valuable time answering simple questions already explained in the prospectus)?


Since you have pretty much clarified for him all the technical "problems" there it might be time to just ignore these nuisance posts and get answering relevant questions there.

[NotLambchop]

Is starting a poll about banning someone with multiple alts a smart thing to do?  The villain might rig the votes...

[hilariousandco]

I don't think it would matter very much as I doubt the outcome of the poll will be conclusive.

[bitcoin.newsfeed]

Voted. No.

reason : Just because what are they writing is not what you want to see, it doesn't mean that they are not right and you are. The truth is often scary or/and ugly here, we're not in pink-glassed wonderland. Also I find myself entertained by these posts and some of them are really smart, precise and informative.

[NotLambchop]

...
- Despite multiple opportunities, he did not deny questions whether he gets paid for trolling. So if this is true, this opens up the possibility that this is a paid troll to deliberately interfere with many investment offerings (= IMO this is spamming with commercial interest).
...

While making accusations that my posts are financially motivated, it is important not to forget your own motivation--making money by selling shares in your scheme.
(= IMO this is spamming conning with commercial interest).

I called Active Mining (which never traded on Havelock, but nonetheless cost its investors and customers millions) a scam.  In apparent agreement, Missouri Securities Department V& and B& the illustrious Mr. Slaughter.

Some of the other "investment offerings" predicted to cause sobbing and snot:
NeoBee (which has traded on Havelock), MintSpare (ditto), HashFast (which has not) BitFunder (which also has not), UkyoLoan (ditto), CoinReturn (Crypto::Stocks), to name just a few.
So yeah, some may now be wishing that I "interfered" a bit harder.

Again,

...
I've been accused of being Mircea Popescu (Romanian exchange owner), Eduardo de Castro (HashFast), crumbs (of Active Mining fame), MikeMikeMike and Puppet (PETA), and countless other bogeymen.
If it helps you to think me any or all of the above, or that I'm being paid for my posts, I won't ruin it for you.  Makes you that much more amusing to deal with.
ty

@bitcoin.newsfeed:  Thanks, weren't you once accused of being crumbs?

*If you wish to learn more about Havelock "investment offerings," here's a handy TL;DR:  Havelock Securities At A Glance: The SRS BZNZ Edition

[bitcoin.newsfeed]

@bitcoin.newsfeed:  Thanks, weren't you once accused of being crumbs?

Yes, in WannaBee thread I was called many names, including crumbs, before and after I sold my sharezzz for 0.0045 and 0.0059 

[railzand]

fuck no, timmy you arse; just fucking shut up for once in your pathetic little life

[JoTheKhan]

Can't ban him. He does more good than harm, even if it doesn't look like it.

[jimmothy]

Can't ban him. He does more good than harm, even if it doesn't look like it.

I disagree. He has been banned before for the exact same thing and so have others (like MPOE PR for example)

He discourages actual discussion and constructive criticism.

Did notlambchop actually convince anyone to not invest in activemining or neobee? Of course not.

If he would make the same points while refraining from childish insults and spamming then maybe he might do some good and not be completely ignored by the majority of the people who fall for the scams he's obsessed with.

[freedomno1]

Voted. No.

reason : Just because what are they writing is not what you want to see, it doesn't mean that they are not right and you are. The truth is often scary or/and ugly here, we're not in pink-glassed wonderland. Also I find myself entertained by these posts and some of them are really smart, precise and informative.

Less the pony have seen some constructive threads besides Foils are needed now and then to push hard truths.
As a point nothing wrong with the stat's here
Could be summed up as BTC holding is greater than investment but the table is constructive enough.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666993.msg7532090#msg7532090
With a USD Tie reservation I guess
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637928.msg7118065#msg7118065

[jimmothy]

Voted. No.

reason : Just because what are they writing is not what you want to see, it doesn't mean that they are not right and you are. The truth is often scary or/and ugly here, we're not in pink-glassed wonderland. Also I find myself entertained by these posts and some of them are really smart, precise and informative.

Less the pony have seen some constructive and accurate threads besides Foils are needed now and then to push hard truths.
As a point nothing wrong with the stat's here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666993.msg7532090#msg7532090

True. I had no idea that thread even existed because I have him on ignore.

I am somewhat changing my opinion on banning him although I just wish he would quit the insults/offtopic/spamming/memes.

At least 50% constructive posts would be nice.

[NotLambchop]

...
I had no idea that thread even existed because I have him on ignore.
...

You quote me.
You thread-stalk me.
You compile lists of my alts.
You start threads begging to ban me.
You claim "...there is a total of ~5000 posts and not a single one of them says something nice," presumably having read every single one.


But ...  you have me on ignore

[Justin00]

I quite like his attitude.
he doesn't throw money at any tard who starts a thread in securities section.... unlike so many here that like to do that...

not that this poll means anything, nor my opinion.. but he's comical and seems to do more good as someone else suggested.
think people are upset because you call out there "investments" or "portfolio" 

[Peter882]

...
I had no idea that thread even existed because I have him on ignore.
...

You quote me.
You thread-stalk me.
You compile lists of my alts.
You start threads begging to ban me.
You claim "...there is a total of ~5000 posts and not a single one of them says something nice," presumably having read every single one.


But ...  you have me on ignore

Sounds like a complicated love-hate relationship lol.

[NotLambchop]

^Not a rock.  I feel nothing.