★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!

[Remy_5]

I'm available to answer any and all questions that you might have.

Hi!

OK, three requests for you:

1) The problem that arises during the creation of the wrong "genesis block", with the use of installer
for Windows systems has been circumvented.
What do you intend to do for Linux and Mac?

2) When you want to update the GitHub?

3) Both the OP and  the official website, reported the data of the specifications of POS incorrect,
particularly MaxAge and MinAge, and they have changed by many many months.
The DevTeam, when the hell intend to update this wrong information?

And always about the OP, if you really want to discourage the use of Cryptsy for its slowness
in maintenance, then I do not really understand why BTER is still in the OP, its deposits are
blocked for months now. At least put in OP a clear warning on BTER.

And about the other exchange alcurEx, with all due respect, with its empty order list does not seem
to give great signs of flourishing health.

Bye Bye

[1715328669]

1715328669

[1715328669]

1715328669

[1715328669]

1715328669

[Strugg]

And always about the OP, if you really want to discourage the use of Cryptsy for its slowness
in maintenance, then I do not really understand why BTER is still in the OP, its deposits are
blocked for months now. At least put in OP a clear warning on BTER.

And about the other exchange alcurEx, with all due respect, with its empty order list does not seem
to give great signs of flourishing health.

Thank You for reminding about Bter!
Exchanges section in op updated.
alcurEx doesn't have much volume, but there was no problems with this exchange as far as I know, that's why I think it can be in the OP.

Cheers!

- Strugg

[hashforce101]

Great reminder Remy and thanks for your past Linux work.

I'm sure the guys will update the info.

I have this really good feeling.

Next couple of weeks I'll do some paid advertising . Just be sure to keep me updated. Some really good suggestions regarding priority from the nee Big investors.

[shahim]

I'm available to answer any and all questions that you might have.

Hi!

OK, three requests for you:

1) The problem that arises during the creation of the wrong "genesis block", with the use of installer
for Windows systems has been circumvented.
What do you intend to do for Linux and Mac?

Hi Remy,

that fix is short before release!

regards
shahim

[Havelivi]

Hello All,

I'm available to answer any and all questions that you might have.

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

looks like all is good for the web wallet release, any hints for future devs?

All I can say is the future is very bright and solid for Navajo guys , its here to stay.

~SoopY~

great news to hear from Dev, bright future only belongs to strong believers Navajo is very solid and promising coin and hope all things under development will be delivered on right time. so hold you coin you coin and keep pushing.

[AgeofCrypto]

I have question for devs. As i see "projects" so there should be a big update till April ends?

[SUM2dev]

I have question for devs. As i see "projects" so there should be a big update till April ends?

Did You see our last announcement?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=679791.msg11155832#msg11155832

Yes, like we stated we are working on these projects now. We are planning to release Web Wallet first on the beginning of incoming month.
Best Regards!

- Navajo Coin Development Team

[gnargnar]

  I thought the next step was about nodes distribution for anon tech, not web wallet.

I really thought the main concern about Navajo Anonymity feature was that the nodes was handled and managed by the nav dev team, hence "centralized".
That was the major thing pointed out by others crypto people against Navajo newest anon release... and you guys told us that you were working on that solution in priority...

why do I feel like Navajo did an half job here for anon? you guys release a 100% well working anon solution, but the major hiccups was the node centralization and instead of *fixing* that, you are working on webwallet?

I understand that your choice of going with development of webwallet (and after a mobile one) is related to make NavajoCoin used by people and providing a user-friendly way to adopt Navajo.  I understand also that the current Navajo anon feature is a fad, or a gimmick, that is not really used by anyone right now intensively, mostly because people that currently own this coin are divided in 2 groups : first group are those that have their nav in wallet and are just staking. The other group are those that leave the coins on the exchanges and are just there to dump at the very first moment they will see an increase in value, but by doing so, they are just dooming their *investment* and delaying any value increase.

I think you should continue working on the anon nodes distribution model mostly because you need to target a third group for NavajoCoin long term viability : the developers/builders/pioneers.  With a totally decentalized anon solution with a well-thought node distribution model, this coin will have a better appeal for that third group and this is the ones that add value to a coin. the actual 2 first groups (holders/stakers in wallet and day-traders) are not those you need to listen to, nor have to worry about... they will anyway be extremely pleased if you are chasing for those valuable peeps that can really add that extra magic every altcoins need.

[shahim]

I thought the next step was about nodes distribution for anon tech, not web wallet.

I really thought the main concern about Navajo Anonymity feature was that the nodes was handled and managed by the nav dev team, hence "centralized".
That was the major thing pointed out by others crypto people against Navajo newest anon release... and you guys told us that you were working on that solution in priority...

why do I feel like Navajo did an half job here for anon? you guys release a 100% well working anon solution, but the major hiccups was the node centralization and instead of *fixing* that, you are working on webwallet?

I understand that your choice of going with development of webwallet (and after a mobile one) is related to make NavajoCoin used by people and providing a user-friendly way to adopt Navajo.  I understand also that the current Navajo anon feature is a fad, or a gimmick, that is not really used by anyone right now intensively, mostly because people that currently own this coin are divided in 2 groups : first group are those that have their nav in wallet and are just staking. The other group are those that leave the coins on the exchanges and are just there to dump at the very first moment they will see an increase in value, but by doing so, they are just dooming their *investment* and delaying any value increase.

I think you should continue working on the anon nodes distribution model mostly because you need to target a third group for NavajoCoin long term viability : the developers/builders/pioneers.  With a totally decentalized anon solution with a well-thought node distribution model, this coin will have a better appeal for that third group and this is the ones that add value to a coin. the actual 2 first groups (holders/stakers in wallet and day-traders) are not those you need to listen to, nor have to worry about... they will anyway be extremely pleased if you are chasing for those valuable peeps that can really add that extra magic every altcoins need.

Hi mate,

We always said open we are working on different sides. And of course a more easy task is able to come faster than a complex task.


Edit: and this does not mean pakage and.Soopy are not working on your main wish. But we already explained what our concerns are.  Webwallet is being worked on without pakage and soopy... So I do not burn theire time!

[AgeofCrypto]

 But didnt your team say that decentralized nodes will be till April ends?

[shahim]

But didnt your team say that decentralized nodes will be till April ends?

There has.never been said it will come in April. Our dev's are working hard on that task in april. And if course we have to be sure their can't be any malicious node or whatever. We learned not to give dates too early that probably can not be hold....

[Strugg]

I thought the next step was about nodes distribution for anon tech, not web wallet.

Improving our Anonymous Technology is the task that pakage and soopy are currently focused on. So yes, we are working on it.
But, don't You think that releasing new Anon just after release of it's first version is hmmm... stupid?
There's a lot of projects, which needs to be delivered to make NAV more popular and attractive for average users. Anonymous Technology needs users, that's why we need to release also other features / projects, not only improve Anon Technology.
Also remember that other projects needed nearly half a year to get open source.

Hope it explains that to You

Cheers

~ Strugg

[BitCoinNutJob]

Great days for NavajoCoin is coming. Hard work of developers group gives us more volume and price will rise again soon.

[chemal]

Its the same story like a half year before. There were a lot of bad voices that anon is scam and false.Only believers won,when they didnt listen to all this fuders and were holding their coind strong.There was only one rule-you had to have a lot of patience.Now everything is the same :we have an amazing projects and we only need time.I am sure next half year those who will hold nav strong will be rich.But warning!It is not so simple.There will be many fudders and other difficulties

[CryptoJohn]

Crypto is so short sighted.

I love the level of professionalism that the NAV team has displayed since the beginning.

I support 100% the asking of questions but tire very quickly when answers are given and users feel the need to rebut said answers.

The question was asked if web wallet is all the team is working on and the answer was the team splits duties and currently half the team is still working on anon but, due to a varied difficulty between projects, the web wallet will most likely be finished first.

The only people that ever question timelines are those ignorant of the development process. Show some respect for the NAV team, it is really the least you can do.

As others have mentioned we are where we were 6 months ago when the price was 300sats. You can buy with confidence knowing that the NAV team is motivated, highly intelligent and has demonstrated a devotion to this project that we don't see in many other coins.

Is this still a good buy? I say yes and although I bought the majority of my coins @ 300sats I continue to pick up more NAV whenever I can. I grabbed another 30k NAV the other day and immediately moved them to my wallet for staking, I suggest you do the same.

[Strugg]

Crypto is so short sighted.

I love the level of professionalism that the NAV team has displayed since the beginning.

I support 100% the asking of questions but tire very quickly when answers are given and users feel the need to rebut said answers.

The question was asked if web wallet is all the team is working on and the answer was the team splits duties and currently half the team is still working on anon but, due to a varied difficulty between projects, the web wallet will most likely be finished first.

The only people that ever question timelines are those ignorant of the development process. Show some respect for the NAV team, it is really the least you can do.

As others have mentioned we are where we were 6 months ago when the price was 300sats. You can buy with confidence knowing that the NAV team is motivated, highly intelligent and has demonstrated a devotion to this project that we don't see in many other coins.

Is this still a good buy? I say yes and although I bought the majority of my coins @ 300sats I continue to pick up more NAV whenever I can. I grabbed another 30k NAV the other day and immediately moved them to my wallet for staking, I suggest you do the same.

Thank You very much for Your support, understanding and kind words John! I fully agree with every sentence.
I hope there will be more people thinking the same way in crypto, thanks again!

Very kind regards!

~ Strugg

[hashforce101]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXXr5ltTWgs

~HaShForce101~

The New Wallet is an absolute Game changer !

http://navajocoin.org/wallets

[gnargnar]

thank you shahim and strugg for your replies i.e. my last post. I appreciate your work and that you take time to communicate with anything that come up this thread.

Crypto is so short sighted.

I love the level of professionalism that the NAV team has displayed since the beginning.

I support 100% the asking of questions but tire very quickly when answers are given and users feel the need to rebut said answers.

The question was asked if web wallet is all the team is working on and the answer was the team splits duties and currently half the team is still working on anon but, due to a varied difficulty between projects, the web wallet will most likely be finished first.

The only people that ever question timelines are those ignorant of the development process. Show some respect for the NAV team, it is really the least you can do.

As others have mentioned we are where we were 6 months ago when the price was 300sats. You can buy with confidence knowing that the NAV team is motivated, highly intelligent and has demonstrated a devotion to this project that we don't see in many other coins.

Is this still a good buy? I say yes and although I bought the majority of my coins @ 300sats I continue to pick up more NAV whenever I can. I grabbed another 30k NAV the other day and immediately moved them to my wallet for staking, I suggest you do the same.

CryptoJohn, i hope you didn't think of my last reply as showing no respect for the nav team. In fact, i'm staying well positive always when it's Navajo, but still voice some concerns and questionning only to learn a bit more about the decisions taken, the roadmap, the interest, the motivation.  But, instead of you, I didn't bought my Navajo's in the 300 satoshis price... I bought all mine between 1.8k to 2.6k  and during that period, the nav dev team and the community members that bought them coins in the 300sat range were "hyping" a lot themselves about the moon landing, but as you know it didn't happened. not because Nav team didn't delivered, but because of those p&d groups that dumped.  So you have to understand our position (those that wasn't there in the 300-ish period) because all we see since the last few weeks is dumpings on any buy walls that have the foolish idea to appear [- omg, even few minutes ago the huge buy wall at 2k was completely dumped on -]

[david1365]

Only 10 days till good news
We are waiting for Anonymous Network Decentralisation in April.
The last chance to buy cheap coins.

I'm looking forward to this announcement as well.

First of all, we will see web & mobile wallet in may, then Anonymous Network Decentralisation will come.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=679791.msg11155832#msg11155832

[navcrane]

Only 10 days till good news
We are waiting for Anonymous Network Decentralisation in April.
The last chance to buy cheap coins.

I'm looking forward to this announcement as well.

Yep, bought again today while it was at 1.6K.