★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!

[yeXIABC]

wait for another drop and join again. Pay like a smart investor and earn money

[blackened515]

Eh, only 0.35 BTC to below 200 sat. Devs work hard but bears work harder to pull price down.

[uszaty43]

Take it easy guys. Soopy said it will be a Christmas suprise and it will be.

[Fritz93]

wait for another drop and join again. Pay like a smart investor and earn money

yep,buying more now,very cheap coinz

[kokos666]

Take it easy guys. Soopy said it will be a Christmas suprise and it will be.

i hope it will be anon transactions. Another delay can be too big disappointment even for "peace and light" fanatics.

<sub>Sorry for my english
- bored bagholder</sub>

[GREEDYJOHN]

Take it easy guys. Soopy said it will be a Christmas suprise and it will be.

i hope it will be anon transactions. Another delay can be too big disappointment even for "peace and light" fanatics.

<sub>Sorry for my english
- bored bagholder</sub>

MY WALLET HAS 57 ACTIVE CONNECTIONS TO NAVAJOCOIN NETWORK. This is the best record so far!

[Remy_5]

nice Remy... we think alike. I was going to add the coin but was pressed for time...thanks for completing the project

I  was amazed at how you are able to integrate well and quickly an image taken for
a joke and have given him a sense. My compliments.

I just ruined your image a bit, and I would have to alternate better levels of snowflakes
and coins, to give more depth to the image.

The character in the photo intrigued me, and I found out who it is: "Ragnar" the official
mascot of the Minnesota Vikings, it looks like a singular type.
His site:
http://www.ragnartheviking.com/

Who would like to see him in "action", while parodies of cheerleaders, here's a video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh4HJilqEyQ

It is my duty to advise against the vision from people faint of heart and pregnant women.


Another clumsy attempt to imagine Ragnar \ Hashforce in his role in the defense:


Bye Bye

[Remy_5]

MY WALLET HAS 57 ACTIVE CONNECTIONS TO NAVAJOCOIN NETWORK. This is the best record so far!

GreedyJohn, at the moment I only have 16 connections, and through the command
getpeerinfo, I see that at least one of the peer has not yet taken steps to update
to the current version mandatory "subver": "/NavajoCoin:2.0.4/".

Given that you have a lot of connections and therefore a better point of view,
you could do me a favor and check if there are others careless peers, please?

Bye Bye

[gregofdoom]

MY WALLET HAS 57 ACTIVE CONNECTIONS TO NAVAJOCOIN NETWORK. This is the best record so far!

GreedyJohn, at the moment I only have 16 connections, and through the command
getpeerinfo, I see that at least one of the peer has not yet taken steps to update
to the current version mandatory "subver": "/NavajoCoin:2.0.4/".

Given that you have a lot of connections and therefore a better point of view,
you could do me a favor and check if there are others careless peers, please?

Bye Bye

Remy_5, I have 54 connections. People still use the old wallets.

addr" : "204.11.237.235:60449" "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/",
addr" : "24.144.199.34:2494", "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/",
"addr" : "122.53.112.74:57454", subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.1/",
"addr" : "70.48.247.34:61374", subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/",
addr" : "95.168.155.17:13049", subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/"
"addr" : "204.11.237.74:44421","subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/"
"addr" : "107.128.25.135:51698", "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.2/",
"addr" : "121.211.218.102:53862","subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.2/"
"addr" : "213.108.114.90:50609", "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/"
"addr" : "121.103.50.175:60277", "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.0/"
"addr" : "71.197.242.109:57852", "subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.3/"

[Remy_5]

Given that you have a lot of connections and therefore a better point of view,
you could do me a favor and check if there are others careless peers, please?

Remy_5, I have 54 connections. People still use the old wallets.

Thank you, you have been very kind and helpful as always.

There are not many, but they are not even a few. Hmmm...   

If they do not provide soon to be updated, I think the Dev Team will take
care of the disregard of these "heedless" ... in some manner.

Bye Bye

[skidog]

Given that you have a lot of connections and therefore a better point of view,
you could do me a favor and check if there are others careless peers, please?

Remy_5, I have 54 connections. People still use the old wallets.

Thank you, you have been very kind and helpful as always.

There are not many, but they are not even a few. Hmmm...   

If they do not provide soon to be updated, I think the Dev Team will take
care of the disregard of these "heedless" ... in some manner.

Bye Bye

[/quoteversion" : 60043,
"subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.4/",Is this the right wallet...Or do I need an update...I usually have about 16 connections with this wallet. Not sure how you get 57. my nodes
addnode=navajosupernode1.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode2.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode3.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode4.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode5.no-ip.biz
addnode=63.165.243.110

[bspus]

If they do not provide soon to be updated, I think the Dev Team will take
care of the disregard of these "heedless" ... in some manner.

Bye Bye

Why are they able to do that? I thought the update was a hard fork which should have made old wallets useless.
Can they still do damage, whether on purpose or by accident?

[Remy_5]

If they do not provide soon to be updated, I think the Dev Team will take
care of the disregard of these "heedless" ... in some manner.

Why are they able to do that? I thought the update was a hard fork which should have made old wallets useless.

Often when blockchain versions are compatible, as in our case, is granted a grace period,
to give way to each of migrating to the latest version.
Finished this grace period, or with a later update, the old versions are finally driven out by the network.

Someone could not even be aware of the last update and should be informed in some way.

Can they still do damage, whether on purpose or by accident?

No, I do not think there is any risk.

As the data provided by GreedyJohn GregOfDoom confirm, the large majority of the nodes has been
successfully updated quickly, and this makes the network robust and secure.

In the worst case scenario, the nodes with old obsolete version could create a small fork
between them, but only harm themselves, because the rest of the network and exchange
refuse their blocks and their transactions.

So, no, there are no risks ... at least for us.
They are only the old nodes to risk now, and they should decide to wake up, now or in
the next update.

This is my opinion, unless corrections DevTeam.


Bye

[gregofdoom]

Remy_5, do not confuse me with the usual helpful GreedyJohn.
This time I was faster than him 

gregofdoom

[Remy_5]

version" : 60043,
"subver" : "/NavajoCoin:2.0.4/",Is this the right wallet...Or do I need an update...I usually have about 16 connections with this wallet. Not sure how you get 57. my nodes
addnode=navajosupernode1.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode2.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode3.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode4.no-ip.biz
addnode=navajosupernode5.no-ip.biz
addnode=63.165.243.110

Do not worry Skydog, your version is correct.

Regarding the number of connections, I confess that even I was a bit skeptical about the numbers
so high often indicated by GreedyJohn, but I have to admit that he's right.

I generally am used to have less than a dozen connections, much more than enough,
but without touching any parameter configuration, I had some lucky moments when I arrived
at 49, and if only yesterday I was 16 connections, now I am 26.

They are the "magic" of the Internet, and of a network of NAV peers spread all over the world
(or my case an internet provider a bit miserable).

Bye Bye

[Remy_5]

Remy_5, do not confuse me with the usual helpful GreedyJohn.
This time I was faster than him 

gregofdoom

I offer my apologies, GregOfDoom, you've been very helpful and fast.

I am so used to associate the large font with GreedyJohn that this
time I have not double-checked the name. 

Thanks again. 

[skidog]

Remy_5, do not confuse me with the usual helpful GreedyJohn.
This time I was faster than him 

gregofdoom

I offer my apologies, GregOfDoom, you've been very helpful and fast.

I am so used to associate the large font with GreedyJohn that this
time I have not double-checked the name. 

Thanks again. 

starting to look like a good time to buy.  Buy low sell high. Soopy said he was coming out with something for Christmas.....

[paycum]

@Shahim. Is it possible to add a "last updated" field above the richlist so we can see when it has been updated?

And another question, are the address from the users on the exchanges not listed? I mean i check my bittrex account i see i have my own nav-bittrex address, but i dont see that address listed in the richlist.

[shahim]

@Shahim. Is it possible to add a "last updated" field above the richlist so we can see when it has been updated?

And another question, are the address from the users on the exchanges not listed? I mean i check my bittrex account i see i have my own nav-bittrex address, but i dont see that address listed in the richlist.

Hi,

yes we are working on that. Time and last counted block will be there somewhere...  (yes Remy, I know ;-))

To the bittrex addresses.... the richlist is not filtered in any way! It just counts and sums every transaction and returns this in a list. Have you tried to search your address with the block explorer? Perhaps Bittrex is hosting a big wallet offline and all you see on the webinterface is virtual, unless you withdraw something? I really don't know, but when I search my address in the block explorer, I can see a balance of 3999,99 NAV. But when I check my balance there it says there are 7120 Nav avaiable. So I think they work with some kind of cold storage tech, to secure themself. When I search my private address the correct amount is shown!

[paycum]

ok thanks, i will do some testing to see what i can find out.