Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 03:03:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 [311] 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 ... 499 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XST] Stealth-Coin.com | Tor | StealthText, World's first anonymous SMS Tx!  (Read 748500 times)
konadave2004
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 04:57:43 AM
 #6201

All time high guys!!

every time there's a "doubter's dip" I pee a little!
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:30:40 AM
 #6202

looks like a motherfucker is holding the price below 13k.
when it is at 12900, a small dump happens
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:35:38 AM
 #6203

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
xtent
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:40:52 AM
 #6204

1. EmilioMann - Bobsurplus is still way into this coin, unlike what your post earlier said.
2. BTCwriter - Quit the whole posting in BTCD and SuperNET thread telling them that they are spamming this thread.  Unless you have facts you are not helping the situation.

I hold this coin and will continue to do so but at the same time both of you make me cringe with your constant cheerleading, circle jerking, reposting, and more.

To sum it up EmilioMann and BTCwriter are the two girls and this thread is becoming their cup.
tljenson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:51:30 AM
 #6205

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.

Here is more than you can handle from the paper at UCLA http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~sahai/work/web/2007%20Publications/ICALP_Chandran2007.pdf
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:57:59 AM
 #6206

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.

The only one who could talk about chandran signatures is Hondo, since is studying for months and have never been implemented before in cryptocoins.
I talked to him today by pm, and he was very excited and said that this will revolutionize cryptonote especially after the security problems that emerged in the coins that use ring signatures (monero, boolberry)
In whitepaper brief he says something about chandran signatures https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9200425/xst/Stealthsend_Whitepaper_brief0914.pdf
Sorry for my English
adhitthana
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 05:59:08 AM
 #6207

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
Quote
A new arrival in the arena of anonymous crypto-currences, StealthCoin (XST), promises to add ring signatures to the Bitcoin codebase with StealthSend, which is still in development. According to the StealthSend whitepaper (https://www.dropbox.com/s/do4urdefwoungjz/Stealthsend-Whitepaper-Brief-201409.pdf?dl=0), StealthSend transactions using ring signatures of 100 keys will only require about one third the space of similar CryptoNote transactions, but give the same level of privacy protection. This savings is achieved through the use of the use of so-called “Chandran Signatures”, and innovations related to the selection of the keys used for the ring signatures. In StealthSend, key selection is based on four numbers: two random numbers (called “nonces”), one number that reduces the difficulty of selecting the keys by specifying a subset of all possible keys, and one number to specify the size of the ring. Thus, the nonce key selection specifies any set of randomly selected keys using only 32 bytes of storage.Applied to CryptoNotes, the nonce key selection proposed for StealthSend would lead to a space savings of about 30% for future transactions.
http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/18/can-anoncoin-be-the-currency-of-the-deep-web/

Or for more technical
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nHiNfcgAAAAJ
tljenson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:04:45 AM
 #6208

Just went over 13k


EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:07:03 AM
Last edit: September 21, 2014, 06:42:23 AM by EmilioMann
 #6209

1. EmilioMann - Bobsurplus is still way into this coin, unlike what your post earlier said.
2. BTCwriter - Quit the whole posting in BTCD and SuperNET thread telling them that they are spamming this thread.  Unless you have facts you are not helping the situation.

I hold this coin and will continue to do so but at the same time both of you make me cringe with your constant cheerleading, circle jerking, reposting, and more.

To sum it up EmilioMann and BTCwriter are the two girls and this thread is becoming their cup.

fuck you mother fucker.
I never spoke to you and also not given you confidence to speak that way to me.
From this moment you will be ignored otário filho duma puta
Back to your scam seu viado zéruela trouxa deve ter crescido sendo comido pela vizinhança toda sua boneca
je_sus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:08:15 AM
 #6210

Get ready for 20k soon!
tljenson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:12:22 AM
 #6211

Stealth is the new king!

CRYPTONOTE COINS ARE DEAD!!!


EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:13:37 AM
 #6212

Just went over 13k




Nice!
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:16:05 AM
 #6213

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
Quote
A new arrival in the arena of anonymous crypto-currences, StealthCoin (XST), promises to add ring signatures to the Bitcoin codebase with StealthSend, which is still in development. According to the StealthSend whitepaper (https://www.dropbox.com/s/do4urdefwoungjz/Stealthsend-Whitepaper-Brief-201409.pdf?dl=0), StealthSend transactions using ring signatures of 100 keys will only require about one third the space of similar CryptoNote transactions, but give the same level of privacy protection. This savings is achieved through the use of the use of so-called “Chandran Signatures”, and innovations related to the selection of the keys used for the ring signatures. In StealthSend, key selection is based on four numbers: two random numbers (called “nonces”), one number that reduces the difficulty of selecting the keys by specifying a subset of all possible keys, and one number to specify the size of the ring. Thus, the nonce key selection specifies any set of randomly selected keys using only 32 bytes of storage.Applied to CryptoNotes, the nonce key selection proposed for StealthSend would lead to a space savings of about 30% for future transactions.
http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/18/can-anoncoin-be-the-currency-of-the-deep-web/

Or for more technical
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nHiNfcgAAAAJ

Alright so the name "Chandran Signatures" is from the person who proposed it; Nishanth Chandran?

And really it is actually Sublinear Signatures that are being proposed to be added which seems to be a variation of the ring-signatures used by cryptonote currencies. (Hypothesizing here, correct me if I'm wrong)

Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.

If I'm correct with the above, I would assume that this implementation of ring signatures would still be vulnerable to the same exploit used in regular cryptonote currencies. (if BCX has actually found an exploit)

Anyway, interesting stuff. Thanks for the links. I'll keep an eye on this.
xtent
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:17:37 AM
 #6214

1. EmilioMann - Bobsurplus is still way into this coin, unlike what your post earlier said.
2. BTCwriter - Quit the whole posting in BTCD and SuperNET thread telling them that they are spamming this thread.  Unless you have facts you are not helping the situation.

I hold this coin and will continue to do so but at the same time both of you make me cringe with your constant cheerleading, circle jerking, reposting, and more.

To sum it up EmilioMann and BTCwriter are the two girls and this thread is becoming their cup.

fuck you mother fucker.
I never spoke to you and also not given you confidence to speak that way to me.
From this moment you will be ignored otário filho duma puta
Back to your scam seu viado zéruela trouxa

YAWN
Something something about confidence to speak that way to you, yes, you sound like a retard and I am tired of your shit.
Please ignore me and continue on speaking in a language other than English, because you fucking suck at it.
Back to my scam?  So you basically called Stealthcoin a scam?
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:25:50 AM
 #6215

Can someone explain Chandran Signature's to me please? Bonus points if it's technical.
Quote
A new arrival in the arena of anonymous crypto-currences, StealthCoin (XST), promises to add ring signatures to the Bitcoin codebase with StealthSend, which is still in development. According to the StealthSend whitepaper (https://www.dropbox.com/s/do4urdefwoungjz/Stealthsend-Whitepaper-Brief-201409.pdf?dl=0), StealthSend transactions using ring signatures of 100 keys will only require about one third the space of similar CryptoNote transactions, but give the same level of privacy protection. This savings is achieved through the use of the use of so-called “Chandran Signatures”, and innovations related to the selection of the keys used for the ring signatures. In StealthSend, key selection is based on four numbers: two random numbers (called “nonces”), one number that reduces the difficulty of selecting the keys by specifying a subset of all possible keys, and one number to specify the size of the ring. Thus, the nonce key selection specifies any set of randomly selected keys using only 32 bytes of storage.Applied to CryptoNotes, the nonce key selection proposed for StealthSend would lead to a space savings of about 30% for future transactions.
http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/18/can-anoncoin-be-the-currency-of-the-deep-web/

Or for more technical
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nHiNfcgAAAAJ

Alright so the name "Chandran Signatures" is from the person who proposed it; Nishanth Chandran?

And really it is actually Sublinear Signatures that are being proposed to be added which seems to be a variation of the ring-signatures used by cryptonote currencies. (Hypothesizing here, correct me if I'm wrong)

Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.

If I'm correct with the above, I would assume that this implementation of ring signatures would still be vulnerable to the same exploit used in regular cryptonote currencies. (if BCX has actually found an exploit)

Anyway, interesting stuff. Thanks for the links. I'll keep an eye on this.

Hondo seems to be creating something new, don't just implementing chandran signatures in source code of the regular cryptonotes
youngmike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:31:45 AM
 #6216

Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900  Smiley Whales eating dumb money  Smiley
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:33:49 AM
 #6217

Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900  Smiley Whales eating dumb money  Smiley

test it  Wink
je_sus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:41:23 AM
 #6218

Nice fake buy wall @0.00012900  Smiley Whales eating dumb money  Smiley

Really, please have at it! Smiley
Viper1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 320


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:48:04 AM
 #6219

Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.

A dev (I think he's a Monero guy) said that Chandran Signatures are actually larger and slower. So I asked him about it given the StealthSend white paper says they're smaller and gave examples of how they would be smaller.  He explained that yes, with the examples given in the white paper, they would be smaller than CN, but when you have a lot less sigs in the mix, it would actually end up being larger than the CN sigs. He also showed me a Monero transaction that was very small, < 1k in size.

He also said that Chandran Signatures have the same issue as the CN ones that were outlined in a whitepaper about flaws in Monero.

BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT
LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV
DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
EmilioMann
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028


#mitandopelomundo


View Profile
September 21, 2014, 06:58:51 AM
 #6220

Now it also appears that the only difference between sublinear ring signatures and non-sublinear ring signatures is the lack of bloat from the former.

A dev (I think he's a Monero guy) said that Chandran Signatures are actually larger and slower. So I asked him about it given the StealthSend white paper says they're smaller and gave examples of how they would be smaller.  He explained that yes, with the examples given in the white paper, they would be smaller than CN, but when you have a lot less sigs in the mix, it would actually end up being larger than the CN sigs. He also showed me a Monero transaction that was very small, < 1k in size.

He also said that Chandran Signatures have the same issue as the CN ones that were outlined in a whitepaper about flaws in Monero.

this guy who you spoke didn't know what is chandran signatures until a few days ago.
monero is a copy&paste of bytecoin
Pages: « 1 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 [311] 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 ... 499 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!