[Feature added] Color besides usernames for Ignored by % of established members.

[jubalix]

I'm a celebrity!

Can I increase the bounty to have a flashing broadway-lit boarder around mine?

I want people to feel special when they choose to ignore me.

why does it say untrustworthy??? because of ignores?

No, it says untrustworthy because accounts on the forums can have "custom titles". Mine is set by Theymos because his personal opinion is that I'm untrustworthy.

so it should be clarrified, in the opinion of theyoms
and you should be afforded a right of reply in a similary public manner

also, you paid 5btc for the ignore function and then go ignored by it??

really

I think there should be +ve as well as -ve clicks, eg likes and ignores

[1714059361]

1714059361

[1714059361]

1714059361

[1714059361]

1714059361

[1714059361]

1714059361

[1714059361]

1714059361

[1714059361]

1714059361

[Matthew N. Wright]

I'm a celebrity!

Can I increase the bounty to have a flashing broadway-lit boarder around mine?

I want people to feel special when they choose to ignore me.

why does it say untrustworthy??? because of ignores?

No, it says untrustworthy because accounts on the forums can have "custom titles". Mine is set by Theymos because his personal opinion is that I'm untrustworthy.

so it should be clarrified, in the opinion of theyoms
and you should be afforded a right of reply in a similary public manner

also, you paid 5btc for the ignore function and then go ignored by it??

really

I think there should be +ve as well as -ve clicks, eg likes and ignores

Theymos doesn't want the forums to be a popularity contest. He's been asked repeatedly to make "+1" a function and declined to.

[SEC agent]

It would be really nice if there were an update on the toplist, I want to know how I've been doing.

zyk 97
Atlas 68
bulanula 66
smoothie 62
Maria 47
Rarity 46
MPOE-PR 37
cunicula 37
bitlane 36
subSTRATA 34
1nject0r 33
ElectricMucus 32

Update?

I am up to 24-37, which should put me in the top 15 or so.

[pekv2]

Don't know how bitlane got up in there, imo, was a great member.

[theymos]

member established_ignores raw_percentage posts adjusted_percentage

smoothie 131 .05331 7539 .04758
zyk 113 .04599 407 .04606
ElectricMucus 109 .04436 5088 .04062
MPOE-PR 86 .03500 3472 .03258
Come-from-Beyond 86 .03500 1762 .03397
wopwop 77 .03133 496 .03134
bulanula 74 .03011 2956 .02811
subSTRATA 73 .02971 29 .03009
Atlas 71 .02889 934 .02854
Jaroslaw 66 .02686 344 .02698
bonker 65 .02645 577 .02639
MysteryMiner 64 .02604 1311 .02538
sublime5447 63 .02564 849 .02535
Matthew N. Wright 61 .02482 5839 .02048
lucif 60 .02442 1753 .02340
ChartBuddy 58 .02360 523 .02358
Maria 56 .02279 407 .02286
nkspace 55 .02238 188 .02263
Rarity 52 .02116 814 .02090
cunicula 52 .02116 1831 .02008
becoin 51 .02075 712 .02058
Micon 50 .02035 1069 .01988
iCEBREAKER 48 .01953 1050 .01908
NEO2012 47 .01912 128 .01943
MeSarah 46 .01872 159 .01899
mai77 45 .01831 418 .01838
Nemesis 42 .01709 593 .01701
Simran 42 .01709 573 .01703
NikolaTesla 41 .01668 346 .01681
meangreen 41 .01668 134 .01698
bitlane 40 .01628 2334 .01478
fourkey2001 40 .01628 144 .01656
Rob E 38 .01546 269 .01565
1nject0r 38 .01546 52 .01583

[Matthew N. Wright]

member established_ignores raw_percentage posts adjusted_percentage

smoothie 131 .05331 7539 .04758
zyk 113 .04599 407 .04606
ElectricMucus 109 .04436 5088 .04062
MPOE-PR 86 .03500 3472 .03258
Come-from-Beyond 86 .03500 1762 .03397
wopwop 77 .03133 496 .03134
bulanula 74 .03011 2956 .02811
subSTRATA 73 .02971 29 .03009
Atlas 71 .02889 934 .02854
Jaroslaw 66 .02686 344 .02698
bonker 65 .02645 577 .02639
MysteryMiner 64 .02604 1311 .02538
sublime5447 63 .02564 849 .02535
Matthew N. Wright 61 .02482 5839 .02048
lucif 60 .02442 1753 .02340
ChartBuddy 58 .02360 523 .02358
Maria 56 .02279 407 .02286
nkspace 55 .02238 188 .02263
Rarity 52 .02116 814 .02090
cunicula 52 .02116 1831 .02008
becoin 51 .02075 712 .02058
Micon 50 .02035 1069 .01988
iCEBREAKER 48 .01953 1050 .01908
NEO2012 47 .01912 128 .01943
MeSarah 46 .01872 159 .01899
mai77 45 .01831 418 .01838
Nemesis 42 .01709 593 .01701
Simran 42 .01709 573 .01703
NikolaTesla 41 .01668 346 .01681
meangreen 41 .01668 134 .01698
bitlane 40 .01628 2334 .01478
fourkey2001 40 .01628 144 .01656
Rob E 38 .01546 269 .01565
1nject0r 38 .01546 52 .01583

Damn. I've got a lot of catching up to do to get to smoothie. 

[RandyFolds]

Damn. I've got a lot of catching up to do to get to smoothie. 

Hell, I used to be up there with the champs, and now I've dropped off the leaderboards altogether. I better iron up my trollin' pants.

[ElectricMucus]

Heh and they told me I'd never catch up with zyk.

[BurtW]

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

You're very established if:
- You have 100+ hours of online time
- You have 100+ posts
- You registered 30+ days ago

There are ~1414 very-established users right now.

The change only shows up in the default theme.

Is this still true or has the system been changed?

[tysat]

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

You're very established if:
- You have 100+ hours of online time
- You have 100+ posts
- You registered 30+ days ago

There are ~1414 very-established users right now.

The change only shows up in the default theme.

Is this still true or has the system been changed?

I believe it's still the same, except there are probably more very-established users now.

[malevolent]

Current rules are:

Is this still true or has the system been changed?

I adjusted the thresholds.

Old:

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

New:

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

Also, I made the light highlight lighter.

and

I changed the algorithm to take into account your number of posts.

ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users

The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.

[BurtW]

Current rules are:

Is this still true or has the system been changed?

I adjusted the thresholds.

Old:

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 0.75% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

New:

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

Also, I made the light highlight lighter.

and

I changed the algorithm to take into account your number of posts.

ignore_ratio = (established_ignore_count + 1 - posts / 500) / total_established_users

The range that you might see under your avatar is no longer quite accurate, though it's pretty close.

TY.

[RandyFolds]

Current rules are:
- 0.35% of very-established users ignore you: no public highlight, but a range on your posts that only you can see
- 0.5% of very-established users ignore you: light highlight
- 1% of very-established users ignore you: medium highlight
- 1.5% of very-established users ignore you: dark highlight

You're very established if:
- You have 100+ hours of online time
- You have 100+ posts
- You registered 30+ days ago

There are ~1414 very-established users right now.

The change only shows up in the default theme.

Is this still true or has the system been changed?

I believe it's still the same, except there are probably more very-established users now.

Something maybe changed?

My little ticker now shoes 13-27 ignores, and I believe it was 12-something yesterday. I guess it could be users ignoring me that are becoming established, but wouldn't that dilute the numbers and hence reduce them? Honestly, I have barely been on here for the past year and have hardly been trolling since my return...though there was some newb trying to solicit $300 for an occulus for his VR porn integration while preaching about the necessity of abusing of women, and I did him a faggot in a mocking manner while demanding he fight me in person if he's the man he claims to be. Even if that racked up some ignores, why would the lower limit of my range go up?

[theymos]

The number of established users increased, moving the range up.

[r3wt]

i'm not understanding the numbers here. my account says 9-14 ignores.

[jackjack]

Did the requirements for being 'very-established' changed since activity appears here?

[theymos]

No.

[Mabsark]

When people call you a troll for making posts they disagree with and put you on their ignore list for replying to people who took the time to respond to your comments, the whole system becomes meaningless and just encourages circle-jerks.

I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.

[jackjack]

Some people only post hate, spam or trolls. I ignore only them, which represents 3 or 4 people.

[Hippie Tech]

When people call you a troll for making posts they disagree with and put you on their ignore list for replying to people who took the time to respond to your comments, the whole system becomes meaningless and just encourages circle-jerks.

I don't even understand why people would want to put anyone on an ignore list. I'd love one of the most ignored users to post the greatest bitcoin tip ever. People would then understand how stupid it is to ignore everything said by a person because they once said something you disagree with.

+ 2-8

My list began to grow thanks to some, not so understanding, folks who didn't like me asking for proof that DGM repays all that it takes.

Those that choose to ignore should be required to explain why and have a tally or list of those they have blacklisted. Likewise, those being ignored should know these people are so they can stand up for themselves if necc.

OK you 10-16, mostly DGM luvin noobs ! Get back into your cages !

HT xD

update..

Make that 10-15.. Its about time I cleaned my monitor.