[ANN][USB] USBCoin - POS. Listed on Bittrex. No IPO, No Premine, No instamine

[joelpina]

I told everyone this was going to happen few days ago..scam coin gets added at launch!

You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.

[1714694491]

1714694491

[1714694491]

1714694491

[cryptoholic11]

Fuck I bought rapidly when it dumps at 600, I bought 0.08BTC, after one minutes it tooks of to 1.6ksat, I had .26. But I thought it could reach 2k or more.
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!

Really man. You want to hear a sob story...I went full retard at 3600 for 1 btc. Then went super retard and put another 1.5 btc from 200-2k, and obv they all got filled. I had a chance to dump at 1700, but got greedy and thought there might be a chance it's not a scam...uber retard!

[Nemesys]

So .. it´s monday afternoon..

I got buttraped all weekend by pointing my hash at Ipopool and letting Bittrex handle my trades.

Is it my responsibility to research and perform due diligence on these new coins that were clearly designed as scams.. ??

I would say that by paying fees to these agencies, they have implicitly ´accepted´ to work towards the best interests of their customers. i.e me...

There have been at least 4 major scam coins in the last week (I´m not going to name them but we all know what they are).

I´m naming Ipopool and Bittrex because I payed them to act in a ´professional´ manner on my behalf. It is my opinion that they have failed in this regard.

In my ´day´ job  I am required by law to ´´ do no harm..´´

Why is there no equivalent requirement here in CryptoLand ..??

Maybe it´s about time there was ..!!

 

[wenwen1978]

<@bittrex-rami> semoer: will post a warning on the market and reopen it most likely, all existing orders have already been cancelled

[brightlight]

Why so many people blame Bittrex or exchange in general? Bittrex didn't make you to invest in this scam, blame yourself. I lost 1BTC on elitecoin, i will not run campaign against exchange because of it.

Oh, you smarty! Bittrex devs are lazy enough to make code that tracks incoming coin count (in a small timeframe) and money supply. I am not a coder, but I believe this isn't so hard to implement.

Notice to be careful with trading doesn't remove obligation to keep trading environment healthy. Yes, crypto world is very volatile, but this case is not an issue of volatility, but a real crime.

How much attacks with fork, scams are behind, but they still are unaware of that issue.

[Dimitry]

Poll how long bittrex stays open for trading!?
i say 2 month tops

[ocminer]

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
  {
    // ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
    uint64_t nCoinAge;
    if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
      return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());

    int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);

    if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
      return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
  }

Code:

bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
  if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
    return true;
  txnouttype whichType;
  CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
  vector<valtype> vSolutions;
  if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
    return true;
  if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
  {
    return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
  }
  else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
  {
    const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
    const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
    return k != CheckHash;
  }
  return true;
}

Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check? 

Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong.

You are right, this is the piece i was searching for,  kernel.cpp line 216:

Code:

bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
  if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
    return true;
  txnouttype whichType;
  CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
  vector<valtype> vSolutions;
  if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
    return true;
  if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
  {
    return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
  }
  else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
  {
    const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
    const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
    return k != CheckHash;
  }
  return true;
}

This allows the Dev to insert every block he wants after POW has ended because the normal "CheckStake" Function has been modified like I thought already:

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))

This is wrong, it should only state:

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake())

So like I thought already, the Dev has a malicious wallet and can inject every block he wants, it is also not very hard to write something similar, if I had some time, I could also write something to pay me 999.999 coins :-)

This was a very well prepared scam .. You'd definitely go to jail for this one if they find you Dev...

[Splatters]

Fuck I bought rapidly when it dumps at 600, I bought 0.08BTC, after one minutes it tooks of to 1.6ksat, I had .26. But I thought it could reach 2k or more.
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!

Really man. You want to hear a sob story...I went full retard at 3600 for 1 btc. Then went super retard and put another 1.5 btc from 200-2k, and obv they all got filled. I had a chance to dump at 1700, but got greedy and thought there might be a chance it's not a scam...uber retard!

you won!

[joelpina]

I told everyone this was going to happen few days ago..scam coin gets added at launch!

You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.

you guys should only blame yourself for trusting proven hustlers

[Equate]

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
  {
    // ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
    uint64_t nCoinAge;
    if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
      return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());

    int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);

    if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
      return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
  }

Code:

bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
  if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
    return true;
  txnouttype whichType;
  CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
  vector<valtype> vSolutions;
  if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
    return true;
  if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
  {
    return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
  }
  else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
  {
    const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
    const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
    return k != CheckHash;
  }
  return true;
}

Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check? 

Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong.

You are right, this is the piece i was searching for,  kernel.cpp line 216:

Code:

bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
  if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
    return true;
  txnouttype whichType;
  CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
  vector<valtype> vSolutions;
  if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
    return true;
  if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
  {
    return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
  }
  else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
  {
    const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
    const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
    return k != CheckHash;
  }
  return true;
}

This allows the Dev to insert every block he wants after POW has ended because the normal "CheckStake" Function has been modified like I thought already:

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))

This is wrong, it should only state:

Code:

if (IsProofOfStake())

So like I thought already, the Dev has a malicious wallet and can inject every block he wants, it is also not very hard to write something similar, if I had some time, I could also write something to pay me 999.999 coins :-)

This was a very well prepared scam .. You'd definitely go to jail for this one if they find you Dev...

I don't think dev has any explanation for it and he would be preparing for another scam now. Good detective work.

[cryptoholic11]

7-8k on bittrex about 24h. Buy cheap! Go to the moon

+1)

Ah the good old days, when we thought this coin had a chance. Oh wait that was only 3 hours ago.
Btw, where is the scam dev..I thought he went to fix those bugs.

[Shadow_Runner]

What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.

[virtuallann]

You got robbed

What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.

[Marvell1]

Like i said though, yeah the detective work is great and all but was found far too late, the Dev and others like him probbaly have 8,9,10 20 other ways to doctor the wallets of thier next scamcoin or come up with another way to inject blocks.  Its on the exchanges to not allow these fucks to not witdraw those ill gotten gains.

If Shittrexx had some sort of moritorium on large BTC withdrawals like a normal bank or exchange does this would NEVER have happend.

btw I also pulled all my BTC out of bittrexx , I left cryptsy, Mintpal and now I'll try polo if they fail me I might shut off all my GPUS and just sell em.

[brightlight]

<@bittrex-rami> semoer: will post a warning on the market and reopen it most likely, all existing orders have already been cancelled

What???

They still want to reopen the market?

Bittrex people are such a greedy people, not better than scam devs.

[Shadow_Runner]

You got robbed

What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.

What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.

[brightlight]

You got robbed

What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.

What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.

You have a lucky day!

[barryzand]

You got robbed

What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.

What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.

short story.... dev scammed us all by adding a sneaky little line off code into the source... so he could add new blocks in the blockchain at will.... thats what I can make of this all

[lemonsieur1]

shame someone used good technical skills to rob a community, of 10 % of the bitcoins in the alt market, you realize the alt market is for the poor folks who are trying to "adopt" cryptos ? ... Bitcoin community should never ask for mass adoption if they have such elements robbing the weakest in the chain .. the crypto experiment wont go to far. Oh and "unregulated free market" is a myth, it's more like a savage immoral jungle.

[Dimitry]

how can we fill a lawsuit against bittrex any ideas this has to stop and 1 thing is for sure they arent doing anything about it.

They where sleeping when the dump was happening have you ever heard something that WEAK! omg it is almost worse than the scam itself

I know what they mean with sleeping they where sleeping with the scamming developer.

obvious scam is obvious