[DiceBitco.in] [Make the most out of your sig!] Make coins by simply posting!

[Lauda]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

[DiceBitcoin]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

[zolace]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

14 post a day is not spam, just cause people post more then 200 posts dont mean is spam. 

[Mitchell]

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

Ah, that is nice to know!

[BitCoinDream]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

What about those, whose ranks will change while the campaign will be running ? They'll paid with the higher or lower amount ?

[niktitan132]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

Sounds fair!

[keithers]

Why keep only 20 full members? You should have removed the tier completely in this case just like Stunna did.
Why have you limited the post number to 200? I'm going to argue this as I believe it is not hard to make more quality replies in 30 days (if you're active).
Anyhow I don't see higher tier people leaving, and this is why you can do whatever you want.
I mean, where would they go?

Because Full Members were not fully abusing it(not all). also, the SR member rank+ can use SIZE in signature, which makes it way more attractive.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

I am definitely interested in joining when there are available slots!

[Gianluca95]

Hi, will begin the enroll at the 00.00 GMT+2 of 1st September (Italian hour) ?

[monbux]

Alright, a few comments on the new rules:

1. I have around 211 posts (according to my Chrome Extension), does that mean I have been put into the "Spammer" section or is that because you haven't checked all posts yet?
2. I don't like getting credited on a website. I'm certain that most people prefer to get it send to their wallet.
3. 0.001BTC for a Senior member is quite low if you ask me, but that is a personal opinion.

It doesn't seem low to me at a glance, but if you look at what legendary rank gets paid, then yes, it does seem quite low

I would say Seniors should stay at 0.0012 BTC, where Heros are 0.0014 BTC, and Legendary at 0.0015 BTC.

[keithers]

Alright, a few comments on the new rules:

1. I have around 211 posts (according to my Chrome Extension), does that mean I have been put into the "Spammer" section or is that because you haven't checked all posts yet?
2. I don't like getting credited on a website. I'm certain that most people prefer to get it send to their wallet.
3. 0.001BTC for a Senior member is quite low if you ask me, but that is a personal opinion.

It doesn't seem low to me at a glance, but if you look at what legendary rank gets paid, then yes, it does seem quite low

I would say Seniors should stay at 0.0012 BTC, where Heros are 0.0014 BTC, and Legendary at 0.0015 BTC.

Yes, at those prices per post you will have a ton of people lining up to join...

[dooglus]

Also, to further fight spam, we will reduce the MAX post count for payment to 200 posts. NONE of the non-spammers passed 100 posts, so 200 is a fair margin for any case

This doesn't make sense to me. If you don't count spam posts anyway, why limit the non-spammers like this?

I've made over 300 posts this month and don't spam.

Yes me too  ,  I think all the users prefer to be paid directly in their btc address ..( it's only my personal opinion  ).

I prefer to be paid to my account on the site. Username 'dooglus'.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

Fair enough.

It doesn't seem low to me at a glance, but if you look at what legendary rank gets paid, then yes, it does seem quite low

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

[Jungian]

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Come on.. tell us! No need to say what site

[Mitchell]

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Well, even if he doesn't want to know it, I do want to know how much you were offered, so please tell me.

[niktitan132]

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Well, even if he doesn't want to know it, I do want to know how much you were offered, so please tell me.

I want to know that,too.   

[zolace]

so people can post more then 200 post a month cause I had done 350 easy in a month.  thats 12 posts a day

[eatingtic]

This is going to really starve the newcomer... now 120 days minimum to earn from pay per post

I fear this will encourage more hackings and sellers of higher level accounts... seems all those seniors kicked from PD have a home now 

[DiceBitcoin]

Also, to further fight spam, we will reduce the MAX post count for payment to 200 posts. NONE of the non-spammers passed 100 posts, so 200 is a fair margin for any case

This doesn't make sense to me. If you don't count spam posts anyway, why limit the non-spammers like this?

I've made over 300 posts this month and don't spam.

Yes me too  ,  I think all the users prefer to be paid directly in their btc address ..( it's only my personal opinion  ).

I prefer to be paid to my account on the site. Username 'dooglus'.

i still 200 posts per month is more than fair, and to fully support this i wouldnt mind take a case-by-case anyone who will post more than 200 constructive posts per month while on campaign, and fully pay for it even if they exceed it.

Fair enough.

It doesn't seem low to me at a glance, but if you look at what legendary rank gets paid, then yes, it does seem quite low

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

As said, i am willing to go per-case for any person who will exceed 200 constructive posts The 200 is the general rule though And especially for Legendary accounts, which we have the maximum payout per post ever Also thanks for all your support, esp to you Dooglus. Its highly appreciated, from any point of view(starting from sig campaign to bugs and suggestions!!)

[monbux]

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Honestly, I don't. But tell us anyways!

[BitCoinDream]

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Well, even if he doesn't want to know it, I do want to know how much you were offered, so please tell me.

I want to know that,too.   

Joining the line. I want to know it as well...

You don't even want to know how much I was offered per post to switch to a different site's signature.

Come on.. tell us! No need to say what site

I want to know the site as well, though I probably know that already

[ChuckBuck]

I'm with the others here.  I want to join this campaign on the 1st, but please reconsider the rate.

0.0012 BTC/post is a fair amount for Senior member, no need for a 0.0004 discrepancy between Senior and Hero Member status.