Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 05:10:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 1315 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000  (Read 2170603 times)
dcct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:08:17 PM
 #3921

What are the important things for mining burst? Could i mine with an old CPU and 2x2TB ore more? How much RAM is usefull? What is with the transferspeed? Could i use more USB Drives?
Is it better to use Linux? Questions over Questions...i hope someone hav answers for me...thanks al lot :-)

The plot settings 0 51200 1000 2 are ok, but thats just 12GB. You need to generate a lot more plot files to get good deadlines. Ram? With linux you can start with 1GB, with windows & java you need 2GB+. The 2x2TB setup will get you way better results.
Slow transfer speeds like with USB2 can slightly reduce your block finding chances, but its still worth it.
1715404214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715404214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715404214
Reply with quote  #2

1715404214
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715404214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715404214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715404214
Reply with quote  #2

1715404214
Report to moderator
1715404214
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715404214

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715404214
Reply with quote  #2

1715404214
Report to moderator
yuk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:09:50 PM
 #3922

they are difference between one big TB plot and one TB splitted in 10 smaller plots?

is possible merge plots? i made many plots due to prevent crash system..
dcct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:12:32 PM
 #3923

they are difference between one big TB plot and one TB splitted in 10 smaller plots?

is possible merge plots? i made many plots due to prevent crash system..

No difference, as long as its not 100's of plots. Just use them as they are.
Q_R_V
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 250


Inactivity: 8963


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:13:58 PM
 #3924

As far as i know there is no difference. As long as they don't overlap everything is ok.
pattitheonly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:19:38 PM
 #3925

What are the important things for mining burst? Could i mine with an old CPU and 2x2TB ore more? How much RAM is usefull? What is with the transferspeed? Could i use more USB Drives?
Is it better to use Linux? Questions over Questions...i hope someone hav answers for me...thanks al lot :-)

The plot settings 0 51200 1000 2 are ok, but thats just 12GB. You need to generate a lot more plot files to get good deadlines. Ram? With linux you can start with 1GB, with windows & java you need 2GB+. The 2x2TB setup will get you way better results.
Slow transfer speeds like with USB2 can slightly reduce your block finding chances, but its still worth it.

Thanks for the answer :-). Could you explain how i calculate the plotvalue? I had 50GB, that means for me 50*1024*1024Byte, but what it means in plots? I read somthing before, but i cuold'nt understand the the calculation...
yuk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:21:17 PM
 #3926

ok thx Smiley
timk225
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 955
Merit: 1004


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:21:52 PM
 #3927

If I had a 8x3TB RAID0 or JBOD span, what generate numbers should I use?

Would I want a single plot?

1TB = 1024 GB

24 TB = 24576 GB

Multiply this by 4096 per GB, equals 100663296.

But I have read here that this big number should be an even multiple of 8191 for whatever reason, and 100663296 / 8191 = 12289.5, so use 12289 * 8191, which equals 100659199.

Spanning 8 3TB drives into one might work (I think Windows NTFS has a 16 TB limit, check on that) but it'd take a helluva long time to plot.  Like weeks with a high end i7 cpu.

My AMD FX 4130 3.8 Ghz cpu took 2-1/2 days to plot 600 GB.

No blocks yet, 2 days later.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2014, 07:36:05 PM
 #3928

If I had a 8x3TB RAID0 or JBOD span, what generate numbers should I use?

Would I want a single plot?

Personally I would do a RAID5, just to have some insurance with the parity and plus it's simplier to manage one plot. If the array fails a drive or two, it's easier to rebuild the array than re-plotting everything again and would have less down time. If you decide not to do an array, RAID/JBOD, then just make a plot for each drive.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
crowetic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1072


https://crowetic.com | https://qortal.org


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2014, 07:42:04 PM
 #3929

Dang, 2TB of my space hasn't been mining all day Sad



              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
             ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
          ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
        ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
       ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
   ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                        ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
  ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                          ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                            ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒                               ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
 ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                      ▒▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓                        ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▓▓▓▓▓
  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▒▒▒▒▒▒     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓
   ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
   ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓              ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒            ▓▓▓▓▓▓▒    ▓▓▓▓▓▓
       ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒   ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
         ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓
           ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
              ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
                   ▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓


ORTAL
    ..Web and Application hosting.
     ⊙ decentralized infrastructure
    ..leveling and voting.
| https://qortal.org - Infrastructure for the future World
            Founder/current dev group facilitator
[/td][/tr][/table]

[/table]
pattitheonly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:43:47 PM
 #3930

What would be a good Solution?

4TB and a Hexa-Core Xeon E5-2620 or better a Quad-Core Xeon E3-1230 and 12TB?
Or better more TB but then it takes so long to plot... Huh
Depredation
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:46:34 PM
 #3931

people dumping now on c-cex Undecided

                              ▄█▄         ▄█▄
                            ▄████▀      ▄████▀
                          ▄████▀      ▄████▀
                        ▄████▀      ▄████▀
                      ▄████▀      ▄████▀
                    ▄████▀      ▄████▀
 ▄█▄          ▄      ▀█▀      ▄████▀
▀████▄      ▄███▄           ▄████▀
  ▀████▄     ▀████▄       ▄████▀
    ▀████▄     ▀████▄   ▄████▀
      ▀████▄     ▀████▄████▀
        ▀████▄     ▀█████▀
          ▀█▀        ▀█▀
.verify.▄  █▄
██ ███▄
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
▀█ ████
   ████
   ████
█▄ ▀███
███▄ ▀█
▄  █▄
██ ███▄
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
▀█ ████
   ████
   ████
█▄ ▀███
███▄ ▀█
▄  █▄
██ ███▄
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
██ ████
▀█ ████
   ████
   ████
█▄ ▀███
███▄ ▀█
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2014, 07:47:56 PM
 #3932

What would be a good Solution?

4TB and a Hexa-Core Xeon E5-2620 or better a Quad-Core Xeon E3-1230 and 12TB?
Or better more TB but then it takes so long to plot... Huh

Hexa would be good to do the plots faster, but 12TB with the Quad is fine too. More HDD storage is more important, you might be able to OC the quad a bit to get it to create plots faster.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
neite99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:49:04 PM
 #3933

people dumping now on c-cex Undecided

That is not dumping. Just standard swings
bitminer82
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:49:28 PM
 #3934

Can anyone explain how to install and use dcct's plot generator for Linux dummies?

I tried last night with the two commands in the OP using Ubuntu and only got an error like 'command "plot" not recognized'.  I'm at work now so I can't get the exact details but it sounds like I screwed something up...  I guess there's a chance I wasn't using 64 but Ubuntu - I just grabbed an old DVD I burned but the plot command should still do something, shouldn't it?

EDIT: Yes I was in the correct directory.  The ls command showed plot, the original .tgz I had extracted as well as all the other files that extracted and compiled with it.

type in:
uname -a

x86_64 in there?

Yes.

Code:
3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 10 19:11:08 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

And the error I get when I try

Code:
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$ ls
Makefile  plot  plot.c  plotgenerator.tgz  shabal.h  shabal.o  shabal.s
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$ sudo ./plot 86----------84595 100000000 10625000 8191 4
[sudo] password for generator:
sudo: ./plot: command not found
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$

Tried with and without the sudo.  Somehow I didn't have write permissions on the drive that I formatted under this user.  I played around with chmod but who knows what that did... It also gave it a crazy weird numbered name.  Linux...
pattitheonly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:50:00 PM
 #3935

What would be a good Solution?

4TB and a Hexa-Core Xeon E5-2620 or better a Quad-Core Xeon E3-1230 and 12TB?
Or better more TB but then it takes so long to plot... Huh

Hexa would be good to do the plots faster, but 12TB with the Quad is fine too. More HDD storage is more important, you might be able to OC the quad a bit to get it to create plots faster.

thanks :-)
Prototyp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 07:52:22 PM
 #3936

Low sells, no panic it will rise again. Smiley

If I had a 8x3TB RAID0 or JBOD span, what generate numbers should I use?

Would I want a single plot?

I use cheap SATA Controller and single drives. Raid5 is safer but you can also take RAID0 or JBOD .

I would always take 2TB plots not  a large plot.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2014, 07:53:02 PM
 #3937

people dumping now on c-cex Undecided

It's going to happen, very normal to have an occasional period of dumping, it will rebound eventually. Just like the people who sold cheap at the beginning of C-Cex listing. All a part of cypto world, just need to wait and jump on opportunities when they arise.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
MOB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 504


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 08:19:36 PM
 #3938

Low sells, no panic it will rise again. Smiley

If I had a 8x3TB RAID0 or JBOD span, what generate numbers should I use?

Would I want a single plot?

I use cheap SATA Controller and single drives. Raid5 is safer but you can also take RAID0 or JBOD .

I would always take 2TB plots not  a large plot.

Thanks!

So, what would the generate command look like?

ID#:

Plot Start: 1

Plot End: 8392704 (for a 2TB--right?)

What are the next two?  The plot size and then what (edit: this is threads maybe?)?  The guide has them set to 1000 & 4 respectively.
duilionet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 08:21:00 PM
 #3939


And the error I get when I try

Code:
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$ ls
Makefile  plot  plot.c  plotgenerator.tgz  shabal.h  shabal.o  shabal.s
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$ sudo ./plot 86----------84595 100000000 10625000 8191 4
[sudo] password for generator:
sudo: ./plot: command not found
generator@generator-desktop:/media/generator/239DA259288DCE73$

Tried with and without the sudo.  Somehow I didn't have write permissions on the drive that I formatted under this user.  I played around with chmod but who knows what that did... It also gave it a crazy weird numbered name.  Linux...

you must first compile C.
Code:
sudo apt-get install build-essential gcc

after You write command Makefile. So Plot file will be created and can be used.
I am not an expert on linux but I learned.  Grin

Promozione ancora per pochi giorni su HASHPROFIT!
ROI circa 3 MESI con sconto del 64% usando il codice HPE161214
I nuovi iscritti riceveranno 200 Kh/s per 7 giorni per provare il servizio.
https://hashprofit.com/en/registration/?hp=114587
dcct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 28, 2014, 08:29:23 PM
 #3940

Quote
Tried with and without the sudo.  Somehow I didn't have write permissions on the drive that I formatted under this user.  I played around with chmod but who knows what that did... It also gave it a crazy weird numbered name.  Linux...

Show us what you did:

ls -la
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 1315 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!