[NSFW] Girls of Reddit's r/GoneWild

[thirdlight]

Can someone make a thing like the p2pool "patron_sendmany" that distributes a donation to all addresses in the GW tracker whose balance is below a user defined threshold.

Inputs: total donation, threshold, optional minimum payment
Output: {"address1": donation/n, "address2": donation/n, ... , "addressn": donation/n}
where address1 - addressn are all the girls addresses that have a balance of less than threshold.
If donation/n is less than minimum payment, then a random selection of enough addresses to just exceed minimum payment is used (this to avoid bitdust).

Bounty address could do this, after the original bounty is distributed, as an additional encouragement.

[Tuxavant]

btw: what about updating OP with the reddit link and a summary ?

Good call. This post has had me real busy.

[Tuxavant]

Can someone make a thing like the p2pool "patron_sendmany" that distributes a donation to all addresses in the GW tracker whose balance is below a user defined threshold.

Inputs: total donation, threshold, optional minimum payment
Output: {"address1": donation/n, "address2": donation/n, ... , "addressn": donation/n}
where address1 - addressn are all the girls addresses that have a balance of less than threshold.
If donation/n is less than minimum payment, then a random selection of enough addresses to just exceed minimum payment is used (this to avoid bitdust).

Bounty address could do this, after the original bounty is distributed, as an additional encouragement.

i'm pretty sure I can do this with in the next GW bounty. Sounds like a fucking GREAT contest.

[payb.tc]

by the way, i updated the payb.tc/ladybytes entry with her new address.

[Tuxavant]

Just thought of this... Who's going to start marketing Bitcoin to the makeup and beauty supply and women's clothing companies now that all the awesomely beautiful women are starting to earn bitcoin - and will eventually want to start spending them?

[HostFat]

Do you think that it can be a good idea to spam some photos ( with btc.to link ) on 4chan ?

[Mushoz]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

[FreeMoney]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

Maybe someone could write a script that moves coin out of that wallet and to her?

[Tuxavant]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

Maybe someone could ...

Please delete this quickly

Edit: fuck it. doesn't matter now. anyone with notify has it anyway.

[rjk]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

According to the reddit post that was fixed already. Apparently the Instawallet site owner changed the link but was able to keep the address or something?

[muyuu]

Is that accurate? because apparently instawallet shows outgoing transactions that are not related to particular accounts (?). I'd appreciate if someone could explain that in a few words, really not feeling like studying every service.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/rim7t/hey_rbitcoin_got_coins_enjoy_the_female_form/c46bi6t

You put a dollar in your bank account.  Someone withdraws a dollar after you and gets your dollar bill.  You still have a dollar in your account even though someone withdrew "your" dollar.

The bank doesn't have a separate cash drawer for every customer.  Neither does instawallet.

Every 'deposit' you see in blockexplorer is a real donation.  Not every 'withdrawal' you see is a withdrawal by the owner of that instawallet.

But my account balance wouldn't show a dollar being sent elsewhere from my account. My account doesn't show individual dollars as entities, they only show balances. Equivalently in Bitcoin, there is no such thing as individual bitcoins with their own entity, there's just transactions. So what is instawallet doing there? Still confused.

Looking at LadyBytes' second account:
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1J7T1xQk2mdEEb5wkP73EtXTox6vWvE7ML

There's a 1BTC "Sent" tx right before my 1.23 donation. Apparently it wasn't her. So what's going on?

[Tuxavant]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

According to the reddit post that was fixed already. Apparently the Instawallet site owner changed the link but was able to keep the address or something?

She the bitcoins are being redirected to her? what's happening to the bitcoins being sent to that old address?

[rjk]

The old LadyBytes address is still getting coins send to it =/ Has InstaWallet done something that new donations to that address are going to LadyBytes?

According to the reddit post that was fixed already. Apparently the Instawallet site owner changed the link but was able to keep the address or something?

She the bitcoins are being redirected to her? what's happening to the bitcoins being sent to that old address?

This is what I saw: http://www.reddit.com/r/GirlsGoneBitcoin/comments/rk0hr/to_the_observant_l33t_hackers/c46g9vy

[DeathAndTaxes]

But my account balance wouldn't show a dollar being sent elsewhere from my account. My account doesn't show individual dollars as entities, they only show balances. Equivalently in Bitcoin, there is no such thing as individual bitcoins with their own entity, there's just transactions. So what is instawallet doing there? Still confused.

Blockchain =/= view of YOUR (or HER) account.

If you deposit funds at say Instawallet or MtGox or xyz bitcoin bank there will be tx that occur as the entity moves coins around, combines them, and handles withdrawals that don't correspond to YOUR indvidual account.

Nothing weird about what is going on @ Instawallet.  If you deposit funds @ Mt.Gox the same thing happens.

No online entity keeps all the funds in the deposit address.  They combine funds to be able to take some of that OFFLINE so only a small portion is available to hackers.

Her losing coins and the Instawallet tx in block chain have nothing to do with each other.

[payb.tc]

Is that accurate? because apparently instawallet shows outgoing transactions that are not related to particular accounts (?). I'd appreciate if someone could explain that in a few words, really not feeling like studying every service.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/rim7t/hey_rbitcoin_got_coins_enjoy_the_female_form/c46bi6t

You put a dollar in your bank account.  Someone withdraws a dollar after you and gets your dollar bill.  You still have a dollar in your account even though someone withdrew "your" dollar.

The bank doesn't have a separate cash drawer for every customer.  Neither does instawallet.

Every 'deposit' you see in blockexplorer is a real donation.  Not every 'withdrawal' you see is a withdrawal by the owner of that instawallet.

But my account balance wouldn't show a dollar being sent elsewhere from my account. My account doesn't show individual dollars as entities, they only show balances. Equivalently in Bitcoin, there is no such thing as individual bitcoins with their own entity, there's just transactions. So what is instawallet doing there? Still confused.

Looking at LadyBytes' second account:
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1J7T1xQk2mdEEb5wkP73EtXTox6vWvE7ML

There's a 1BTC "Sent" tx right before my 1.23 donation. Apparently it wasn't her. So what's going on?

don't know why you're confused by this... it's the same thing that happens at exchanges like mtgox.

even though you get a personalised deposit address, coins come out of that address to pay other people's withdrawals.



try to follow this...  

1. instawallet launches and is a brand new web site

2. two people each get an address, and each deposit 10 btc to 'their' address.

3. person 1 decides to withdraw 8 btc: this causes 10 btc to come out of his address, and 2 btc of that gets sent to a 'change' address belonging to instawallet. this change address does not correspond to any customer addresses.

4. person 1 checks block explorer and says WTF i only withdrew 8 btc but it says 10 btc sent.

5. person 2 decides to withdraw 2 btc, this causes instawallet to send it from the change address, since it has a 2 btc transaction there.

6. person 2 checks block explorer and says WTF i withdrew 2 btc but my address still says 10 received and none sent.

[muyuu]

Is that accurate? because apparently instawallet shows outgoing transactions that are not related to particular accounts (?). I'd appreciate if someone could explain that in a few words, really not feeling like studying every service.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/rim7t/hey_rbitcoin_got_coins_enjoy_the_female_form/c46bi6t

You put a dollar in your bank account.  Someone withdraws a dollar after you and gets your dollar bill.  You still have a dollar in your account even though someone withdrew "your" dollar.

The bank doesn't have a separate cash drawer for every customer.  Neither does instawallet.

Every 'deposit' you see in blockexplorer is a real donation.  Not every 'withdrawal' you see is a withdrawal by the owner of that instawallet.

But my account balance wouldn't show a dollar being sent elsewhere from my account. My account doesn't show individual dollars as entities, they only show balances. Equivalently in Bitcoin, there is no such thing as individual bitcoins with their own entity, there's just transactions. So what is instawallet doing there? Still confused.

Looking at LadyBytes' second account:
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1J7T1xQk2mdEEb5wkP73EtXTox6vWvE7ML

There's a 1BTC "Sent" tx right before my 1.23 donation. Apparently it wasn't her. So what's going on?

don't know why you're confused by this... it's the same thing that happens at exchanges like mtgox.

even though you get a personalised deposit address, coins come out of that address to pay other people's withdrawals.



try to follow this...  

1. instawallet launches and is a brand new web site

2. two people each get an address, and each deposit 10 btc to 'their' address.

3. person 1 decides to withdraw 8 btc: this causes 10 btc to come out of his address, and 2 btc of that gets sent to a 'change' address belonging to instawallet. this change address does not correspond to any customer addresses.

4. person 1 checks block explorer and says WTF i only withdrew 8 btc but it says 10 btc sent.

5. person 2 decides to withdraw 2 btc, this causes instawallet to send it from the change address, since it has a 2 btc transaction there.

6. person 2 checks block explorer and says WTF i withdrew 2 btc but my address still says 10 received and none sent.

I see. So stats based on the public address won't be accurate as her balance is split by several instawallet-controlled addresses. That was the whole premise, wasn't it? I mean, the script posted before looks at her transactions based on blockchain.info while that's not their actual balance, though it may roughly be.

[DeathAndTaxes]

I see. So stats based on the public address won't be accurate as her balance is split by several instawallet-controlled addresses. That was the whole premise, wasn't it? I mean, the script posted before looks at her transactions based on blockchain.info while that's not their actual balance, though it may roughly be.

Trying to determine CURRENT balance based on blockchain won't work for the reasons given.  The address instawallet (or any exchange) gives you is simply the deposit address.  So theft or no theft there is no way to know how much or when funds were transfered or current balance.

Still any script that looks for tx TO the deposit address is looking at how much was GIVEN not the current BALANCE.  The amount donated/given will be exactly accurate however no public stat can tell you someone's balance (unless funds never move).

[muyuu]

I see. So stats based on the public address won't be accurate as her balance is split by several instawallet-controlled addresses. That was the whole premise, wasn't it? I mean, the script posted before looks at her transactions based on blockchain.info while that's not their actual balance, though it may roughly be.

Trying to determine CURRENT balance based on blockchain won't work for the reasons given.  The address instawallet (or any exchange) gives you is simply the deposit address.  So theft or no theft there is no way to know how much or when funds were transfered or current balance.

Still any script that looks for tx TO the deposit address is looking at how much was GIVEN not the current BALANCE.  The amount donated/given will be exactly accurate however no public stat can tell you someone's balance (unless funds never move).

That's supposing instawallet doesn't use that account to give change from others' transactions, right? because, since they're book-keeping in a parallel balance, that could be the case.

Well, I guess there's no good reason to do that.

[Tuxavant]

Wow... 6 girls have received a potential total of $360 so far. That's $60 per photo.

100 redditors have contributed a average $3.60 each (I didn't bother to count the actual transfers into the 6 addresses.

When you consider that a lot of this money was not just for ThanksFapping, but the novelty and appreciation to the girls for trying something new and becoming a part of the Bitcoin community (and economy), I think this is some cheap entertainment and publicity for Bitcoin - and a good profit model for the girls!

Can you imaging a 10 billion dollar bitcoin economy JUST because of the porn network effect?

[molecular]

Can you imaging a 10 billion dollar bitcoin economy JUST because of the porn network effect?

can you imagine an x billion dollar communication network JUST because of the porn network effect?