⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ Low House Edge ⭐ Wagering Contest ⭐ Daily Challenges ⭐

[stomachgrowls]

Its been a while for someone to hit up some Jackpot.This is just 7.5% of the total pot but still a good hit.

[1714751444]

1714751444

[1714751444]

1714751444

[DarkDays]

New leader on BTC wagering contest: Player Penelope45 wagered 193.21BTC in short time. Estimated reward: 0.38BTC

Still 6 days to go, anything can happen

Penelope45  is a baller, I would not consider wagering close to that amount even if I was able to afford it. In my view the calculated risk-reward is not worth, but clearly this is my opinion.

However, these types of bold moves underline the confidence players have playing on casinos like Crypto.Games, and if anything it keeps on adding to the player confidence. The fact that there has not been any disputes over payouts also adds more credibility to the point where some (like in the example above) can even risk wagering their savings! Bravo 

[s0lidus]

Its been a while for someone to hit up some Jackpot.This is just 7.5% of the total pot but still a good hit.

Imagine hitting 7.5% of 3.82BTC Jackpot (would be 0.2865 BTC) 



Only 3 days and 10 hours left for this month's wagering contest.
Players still going hard on some altcoins CryptoGames support. Rankings and estimated rewards can be found on this page ;-)

[s0lidus]

3 nice x9920 hits from user Creampie within 6,231 attempts.



More to follow? Let's hope so!

-edit- Less than 2000 bets later another hit similar to the last one on screenshot above: BetID 5,926,207,682.

[stomachgrowls]

This player name "Bruno" hitting up 5x - 16.4x multipliers in Dice! Awesome..


28 hours left before the monthly wager contest do ends! Hurry and secure your spot in the top.

[DarkDays]

Stuck in for this Halloween and you don't know how to keep yourself entertained?
Check out the latest promotion set by this casino... For more details, follow the Tweet (here). Enjoy 

[Crypto.Games]

Winners of last month's contest have received their rewards. Rankings can be found on our website (your account > contests > past month winners)


Contest of November has started already:

[Crypto.Games]

Litecoin Lottery round #174 will close tomorrow, November 3rd at 7:30 UTC.

Current prizes:
1st place: 8.548 LTC
2nd place: 1.603 LTC
3rd place: 0.534 LTC

Total tickets bought so far: 2,137
Price per ticket: 0.005 LTC


Current top 3 ticket owners:

StupidBetsBJ with 601 tickets (28.1235% chance)
Osijek with 501 tickets (23.4441% chance)
Sirtas with 200 tickets (9.3589% chance)


Still more than 17 hours left to buy tickets


Also, schedule for this week's daily and weekend challenges can be found on this page: https://crypto.games/promotions.




Catch the winning spirit!

[stomachgrowls]

What a nice hit from some Hidden players neither just a single person or different but
both bets do able to hit up 9920x in dice! Amazing..

[webtricks]

What a nice hit from some Hidden players neither just a single person or different but
both bets do able to hit up 9920x in dice! Amazing..

Considering that the both bets are at the interval of 90 seconds and the minimum bet interval on Crypto.Games is 0.1 second, player had made 900 auto-bets of 0.00001516 BTC between the two winning bets.

Since, he was chasing 'over 99.989' or 'under 0.010', his win-return is 9920x. As he hit 9920x twice in the interval of 900 bets, he is in the profit of = 0.30074408 - 0.013644 = + 2104.22%.

So after making the second bet, he still had the spread of 9,468 more bets (assuming he made 9,469 bets before the first bet) to hit another 9920x and still be in profit if he missed to do so!! Really impressive!!

[s0lidus]

What a nice hit from some Hidden players neither just a single person or different but
both bets do able to hit up 9920x in dice! Amazing..

Considering that the both bets are at the interval of 90 seconds and the minimum bet interval on Crypto.Games is 0.1 second, player had made 900 auto-bets of 0.00001516 BTC between the two winning bets.

Since, he was chasing 'over 99.989' or 'under 0.010', his win-return is 9920x. As he hit 9920x twice in the interval of 900 bets, he is in the profit of = 0.30074408 - 0.013644 = + 2104.22%.

So after making the second bet, he still had the spread of 9,468 more bets (assuming he made 9,469 bets before the first bet) to hit another 9920x and still be in profit if he missed to do so!! Really impressive!!

May I refer you to this post

Even though their username shows [hidden], it's the same player.. So they already had 4 hits (in 8,060 bets) before these two hits mentioned by @stomachgrowls


Get ready for Bitcoin Lotto round #524, which will close in approx 8 hours!

Current prizes:
1st place:  0.071840 BTC
2nd place: 0.013470 BTC
3rd place: 0.004490 BTC

Total tickets bought so far: 898
Price per ticket: 0.0001 BTC

The more tickets players buy, the bigger the prize pool! 100% of raised funds goes to winners: 1st place gets 80%, second place 15% and third place 5%.


Catch the winning spirit!

[webtricks]

~~
[/center]

~~

May I refer you to this post

Even though their username shows [hidden], it's the same player.. So they already had 4 hits (in 8,060 bets) before these two hits mentioned by @stomachgrowls

Oh great, that is quite some streak. Considering Crypto.Games has only 0.8% house edge, it is one of the best choice if someone wants to chase high roll by making large number of auto-bets of small amount.

There's a school of thought which states that no matter the odds, probability of every event is 50%. It will either happen or it won't. So the probability of hitting 99.99 is equal to hitting 51-99.99 because the roll result is a single number which either would be your choice or it won't (binary world -eh).

Going by this school of thought, betting in smaller fractions and larger number of bets would actually increase the chance of winning than betting in large fractions and smaller number of bets because all you need is single win before the total bankroll expires in order to make the profit. So smaller the bet size, more chances you will get to hit a single win.

However, I find this thought absurd in practical world due to the 'house edge' factor. But after seeing Creampie's winning streak, I am willing to try this too. Since Crypto.Games has one of the lowest house edge out there, it maybe worth trying.

[Karartma1]

Another possibility is that the player chases, let's say, over 99.989 and the bet result happens to be under 0.010 
That happened to me three years ago for example. Not only one has to go for the correct result (over/under) but also in the right direction!
Going back to the hidden user bets it would be nice to know the overall profit.

[imstillthebest]

Another possibility is that the player chases, let's say, over 99.989 and the bet result happens to be under 0.010  
That happened to me three years ago for example. Not only one has to go for the correct result (over/under) but also in the right direction!
Going back to the hidden user bets it would be nice to know the overall profit.

three years ago ? why so long , arent you not chasing for that payout anymore ? but why chase it when the chance of winning is low where you can always win on lower odds more often . the experience of wrong sides did happen to me alot and the worst is when im chasing the max multiplier , i could have also won if the dice fall on the right side . this was the main problem of a dice player but there is a crash and limbo game if your always annoyed of that wrong side because on crash and limbo the game only goes on one direction

[s0lidus]

Another possibility is that the player chases, let's say, over 99.989 and the bet result happens to be under 0.010  
That happened to me three years ago for example. Not only one has to go for the correct result (over/under) but also in the right direction!
Going back to the hidden user bets it would be nice to know the overall profit.

Overall profit of 0.44BTC:
https://crypto.games/player/crmx (changed nick from Creampie to crmx, as shown on their BetIDs which aren't set to hidden)

They placed some bigger bets on other games after winning, so total wager is not from the x9920 bets only


First place prize on today's BTC lottery was won by player Joren. He won 0.072880 BTC while owning only 8 tickets (0.878% of total). Second and third place prizes went to Styfic99 and Penelope45. Congrat$!!

Next lottery round will be Ethereum Lottery round #232, which closes on Thursday November 5th at 7:30 UTC. 18 hours left to buy tickets.

Current prizes:

1st place: 1.1376 ETH
2nd place: 0.2133 ETH
3rd place: 0.0711 ETH

Total tickets bought so far: 948
Price per ticket: 0.0015 ETH


Current top 3 ticket owners:

Bandos231 with 300 tickets (31.6456% chance)
Amans056 with 200 tickets (21.0970% chance)
Aguisel935 with 100 tickets (10.5485% chance)


Almost forgot a nice 334,705,108 Playmoney (value 0.06694102 BTC; 926.73 USD) Jackpot hit from player Hardwell on roulette with bets of 1,480 Playmoney (30 satoshi value).

This is how roulette jackpot works (from the site's FAQ):

[DarkDays]

Check out these crazy blackjack bets!!! Some of the wagered amounts are in sane...

Do you expect the wagering and gambling in general to be reduced and people using other cryptos to gamble with now that BTC has gone over 14k?

[janggernaut]

three years ago ? why so long , arent you not chasing for that payout anymore ? but why chase it when the chance of winning is low where you can always win on lower odds more often . the experience of wrong sides did happen to me alot and the worst is when im chasing the max multiplier , i could have also won if the dice fall on the right side . this was the main problem of a dice player but there is a crash and limbo game if your always annoyed of that wrong side because on crash and limbo the game only goes on one direction

chasing high multipler isn't easy. I also ever had that situation too when i looking for higher than xx, but it rolled lower than xx i looking for (i've used almost all my bankroll.on that time at 9900x multipler). But I believe if we can earn bigger profit if we chasing high multipler than low multipler, since our bankroll will bust immediately once our bet lose if chasing low multipler.

[stomachgrowls]

Important Announcement: Delisting Stratis.

Due to the upcoming blockchain swap on Stratis, a switch from STRAT to a new asset called STRATX, CryptoGames sadly have made the decision to remove Stratis from the website.

You can read more about this matter: https://blog.crypto.games/2020/11/important-announcement-delisting-stratis.html

[DarkDays]

~~
[/center]

~~

May I refer you to this post

Even though their username shows [hidden], it's the same player.. So they already had 4 hits (in 8,060 bets) before these two hits mentioned by @stomachgrowls

Oh great, that is quite some streak. Considering Crypto.Games has only 0.8% house edge, it is one of the best choice if someone wants to chase high roll by making large number of auto-bets of small amount.

There's a school of thought which states that no matter the odds, probability of every event is 50%. It will either happen or it won't. So the probability of hitting 99.99 is equal to hitting 51-99.99 because the roll result is a single number which either would be your choice or it won't (binary world -eh).

Going by this school of thought, betting in smaller fractions and larger number of bets would actually increase the chance of winning than betting in large fractions and smaller number of bets because all you need is single win before the total bankroll expires in order to make the profit. So smaller the bet size, more chances you will get to hit a single win.

If you think about it, it makes sense. By increasing the spread of bets with small amounts you increase that 50:50 odds more and more in your favour to win. SO there is a good strategy if you have the time to do this rather than spend your pot on one large bet. Crypto.Games with 0.8% house edge and others with a similarly low house edge are a good place to start testing this. Even if it turns out it doesn't work for you at least you know you gave it a go.

If you put this theory to test you'll learn more and more why other casinos aren't so generous with their house-edge, and if when looking at which casino to try out house edge wasn't a factor you checked for, now you get the basic understanding why it is relevant that you take it into consideration.

[Karartma1]

I am a fan of the 50% theory too. I remember when I had a losing streak of 15 while betting at ~70%: one might think that's impossible while it actually is, otherwise, casinos would be already bankrupted. Also, I lost several 97% chance bets so most of the time it really feels like it's either you win or you lose regardless of the chance. Every bet result, under provably fair conditions, is sort of unique.