TimC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022
|
|
December 27, 2017, 04:47:56 PM |
|
yeah bittrex is on the same chain, they are increasing at the same rate re nodes j3bfgeksbhozblzz.onion qvvhdjwgtjjjqkxu.onion
these are both official and will be added to new sources
Thanks my wallet has three connections and it scyning up. I will keep it unlocked for staking and see if we can start moving the chain forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
argakiig1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 05:17:22 PM |
|
Only problem with the name torq is there was literally a new eth token with the same name released yesterday. Might be majorly confusing for people
If u look between lines ull see the problem is much bigger than name. All roots of ur disaster lie in ur amateurish mindset. I have no idea how atomic swaps and escrow will be executed via tor, connection is weak and will not convey all the data through opto fiber channels. Tor exit nodes are too slow to handle the transactional load users may be capable of producing, hence less chances that this idea will survive. Ok, what makes atomic swaps work is that they are time locked transactions, as long as the transaction is posted on one chain or another I fail to see how speed has to do with it? If the transaction makes it on the chain it is valid for a set time, if the swap can be validated and completed all that is required is a stable chain, which would suffer the same fate as any coin if the clients were not running... I do have to say though, this coin has managed to keep the chain going even when I was unable to maintain it for nearly 2 years quietly existing within the tor network never actually using exit nodes as the traffic never had a need to leave the network except through relays such as the client.
|
|
|
|
goddas044
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 05:21:13 PM |
|
I saw that virgo mentioned a couple of weeks ago that you're looking at possibly implementing some features from the raiblocks platform? Sounds very exciting
|
|
|
|
argakiig1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 05:23:45 PM |
|
I saw that virgo mentioned a couple of weeks ago that you're looking at possibly implementing some features from the raiblocks platform? Sounds very exciting
I still need to look into it, the codebases are vastly different but I am sure with digging it would be possible to implement
|
|
|
|
goddas044
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 05:54:39 PM |
|
I saw that virgo mentioned a couple of weeks ago that you're looking at possibly implementing some features from the raiblocks platform? Sounds very exciting
I still need to look into it, the codebases are vastly different but I am sure with digging it would be possible to implement Sounds great man Anyone got any links to a wallet download? Old dropbox links are outdated now.
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 06:02:05 PM |
|
The only wallet I found was the Android app and I'm not sure if it still works.
|
|
|
|
argakiig1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 06:18:36 PM |
|
I saw that virgo mentioned a couple of weeks ago that you're looking at possibly implementing some features from the raiblocks platform? Sounds very exciting
I still need to look into it, the codebases are vastly different but I am sure with digging it would be possible to implement Sounds great man Anyone got any links to a wallet download? Old dropbox links are outdated now. I am in the process of rebuilding my build environment at which point I will post updated Installers, As a side note, you can also build from source https://github.com/sonicscrew/sonicscrewdriver
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 27, 2017, 10:15:05 PM |
|
I posted on the Reddit page that we were looking for Developers.
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2017, 12:12:50 AM |
|
Only problem with the name torq is there was literally a new eth token with the same name released yesterday. Might be majorly confusing for people
If u look between lines ull see the problem is much bigger than name. All roots of ur disaster lie in ur amateurish mindset. I have no idea how atomic swaps and escrow will be executed via tor, connection is weak and will not convey all the data through opto fiber channels. Tor exit nodes are too slow to handle the transactional load users may be capable of producing, hence less chances that this idea will survive. Ok, what makes atomic swaps work is that they are time locked transactions, as long as the transaction is posted on one chain or another I fail to see how speed has to do with it? If the transaction makes it on the chain it is valid for a set time, if the swap can be validated and completed all that is required is a stable chain, which would suffer the same fate as any coin if the clients were not running... I do have to say though, this coin has managed to keep the chain going even when I was unable to maintain it for nearly 2 years quietly existing within the tor network never actually using exit nodes as the traffic never had a need to leave the network except through relays such as the client. I'm very impressed that the chain has lasted on its own without updates for that long. That's either luck or damn good development on your part Arg. That's longer than dogecoin went without updates and I can tell you those developers are very proud of that fact so you should be proud if that as well.
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2017, 01:29:23 AM |
|
Maybe we should make a new bitcointalk forum. Not sure if I can as a newb. I suggest [TORQ] Torque - TOR, Stealth Send and Steganography based Anon App.
|
|
|
|
sneakycoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 28, 2017, 03:11:26 AM |
|
I agree, we should!
|
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2017, 05:55:43 PM |
|
If torque could implement raiblocks block-lattice while running on the Tor network I think that could be one of the biggest developments of 2018 in cryptocurrency. Instant, private, free transactions anyone?
|
|
|
|
argakiig1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2017, 06:29:23 PM |
|
Just an update I have created a checkpoint server, so the error about checkpoints being out of date should go away
|
|
|
|
fracas
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
Multiversum
|
|
December 28, 2017, 06:49:42 PM |
|
This one seems INACTIVE according to Coinmarketcap, is it true?
|
|
|
|
argakiig1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2017, 06:53:35 PM |
|
This one seems INACTIVE according to Coinmarketcap, is it true?
It is in the process resuming development and rebranding. Once everything is back up and running in place I can reach out and have them update information, although I bet they will want to see it on an exchange first.
|
|
|
|
sneakycoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 29, 2017, 07:57:26 PM |
|
Looking forward to it being listed again
|
|
|
|
ph4nt0m
|
|
December 29, 2017, 10:14:36 PM |
|
This one seems INACTIVE according to Coinmarketcap, is it true?
It is in the process resuming development and rebranding. Once everything is back up and running in place I can reach out and have them update information, although I bet they will want to see it on an exchange first. Arg, why do you use an alt? What's happened to your main acc?
|
|
|
|
virgojeep1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2017, 03:55:59 AM |
|
Same thing that happened to mine probably.
|
|
|
|
Victorio
|
|
December 30, 2017, 10:26:38 AM |
|
WTB OTC: 1000 coins for 0.03 ETH (160 sat per coin)
|
|
|
|
|