rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
August 15, 2012, 03:49:26 AM |
|
- there are 19 devices This is because one MiniRig is actually 20 (+/- 1) Next generation Singles (which probably won't ever be sold individually). Both of mine have 18, but each one hashes at the advertised speed. The number of modules has been reported anywhere from 17 to 20, and it seems that some are slower than expected so more are added to make sure the device as a whole performs as advertised.
|
|
|
|
Inaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 15, 2012, 04:45:32 AM |
|
That's correct, rjk. I've not seen a 20 unit rig yet, but there are 17 - 19 unit rigs shipping currently.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
August 15, 2012, 11:25:54 AM |
|
cgminer version 2.6.4 - Started: [2012-08-15 12:18:14] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):27807.5 (avg):24947.1 Mh/s | Q:1591 A:20967 R:235 HW:0 E:1318% U:344.2/m TQ: 0 ST: 21 SS: 0 DW: 150 NB: 10 LW: 25125 GF: 1 RF: 0 Connected to ... with LP as user ... Block: 000001419794b1cf01e6d5abca6d92fe... Started: [13:18:46] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [.]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit BFL 0: 45.7C | 1309.7/1313.9Mh/s | A:1121 R:16 HW:0 U:18.40/m BFL 1: 45.8C | 1309.8/1313.9Mh/s | A:1076 R: 9 HW:0 U:17.67/m BFL 2: 38.0C | 1309.8/1313.9Mh/s | A:1109 R:12 HW:0 U:18.21/m BFL 3: 42.2C | 1309.9/1312.8Mh/s | A:1082 R:11 HW:0 U:17.76/m BFL 4: 45.1C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1100 R:12 HW:0 U:18.06/m BFL 5: 37.1C | 1309.7/1312.8Mh/s | A:1087 R:14 HW:0 U:17.85/m BFL 6: 39.9C | 1309.7/1312.8Mh/s | A:1110 R:13 HW:0 U:18.22/m BFL 7: 35.8C | 1310.1/1312.8Mh/s | A:1122 R:15 HW:0 U:18.42/m BFL 8: 38.5C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1136 R:14 HW:0 U:18.65/m BFL 9: 39.0C | 1309.9/1312.8Mh/s | A:1141 R:14 HW:0 U:18.73/m BFL 10: 40.6C | 1309.6/1312.8Mh/s | A:1114 R:13 HW:0 U:18.29/m BFL 11: 44.2C | 1309.7/1312.8Mh/s | A:1102 R:10 HW:0 U:18.09/m BFL 12: 40.8C | 1309.7/1312.8Mh/s | A:1164 R:16 HW:0 U:19.11/m BFL 13: 44.4C | 1310.0/1312.8Mh/s | A:1063 R: 9 HW:0 U:17.45/m BFL 14: 38.7C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1079 R:16 HW:0 U:17.72/m BFL 15: 39.1C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1154 R:12 HW:0 U:18.95/m BFL 16: 41.1C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1097 R:15 HW:0 U:18.01/m BFL 17: 35.2C | 1309.8/1312.8Mh/s | A:1052 R: 9 HW:0 U:17.27/m BFL 18: 37.9C | 1311.0/1313.9Mh/s | A:1080 R: 5 HW:0 U:17.73/m --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
after downgrading to 1300MH/s all modules perform as expected. The hashrate reported by cgminer did not change much but the hash rate reported by the pool increased :-) In other words the "U" value is very important (something like "luck-rate" which should be ~ 100% [see slush pool / ztex driver] is missing in the statistics). I guess the 1500MH/s firmware causes the device to miss many shares (50%-80%) without reporting hardware problems.
I also have to admit that with "-S auto" I did detect 2 more devices (not shown) but these had communication problems, very low hashrate and 100 times smaller utility (U) than the other devices, so I don't use them. I was not able to detect them with easyminer.
|
|
|
|
Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
|
August 15, 2012, 02:17:47 PM |
|
cgminer version 2.6.4 - Started: [2012-08-15 12:18:14] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):27807.5 (avg):24947.1 Mh/s | Q:1591 A:20967 R:235 HW:0 E:1318% U:344.2/m TQ: 0 ST: 21 SS: 0 DW: 150 NB: 10 LW: 25125 GF: 1 RF: 0 Connected to ... with LP as user ... Block: 000001419794b1cf01e6d5abca6d92fe... Started: [13:18:46]
So, this is your unit? I guess the list needs to be updated. Probably means the JWU42 also received his. Just trying to figure out the timeline.
|
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
August 16, 2012, 06:12:16 PM |
|
U:344.2/m (found shares per minute) seems to be the important number. divided by seconds in a minute (/60) multiplied by the number of hashes needed to find a share (*2^32) and converted into Giga (/10^9) I get a hashrate of 24.6 GH/s. This is slightly below the advertised speed but still acceptable.
|
|
|
|
dust
|
|
August 17, 2012, 04:29:08 PM |
|
Inaba set up my rig yesterday (8/16/2012 for the OP)
|
|
|
|
Michail1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1499
Merit: 1164
|
|
August 17, 2012, 09:45:55 PM |
|
Inaba set up my rig yesterday (8/16/2012 for the OP) Probably safe to assume that everyone before you has received theirs as well. Just not updated on the list.
|
|
|
|
Paladin69
|
|
August 19, 2012, 08:10:54 AM |
|
Got mine on 8/14
It was shipped on 8/10
|
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2012, 06:17:04 PM |
|
DOn't use the auto-tune package - just sayin' Came from BFL with 4 units at 1500 and now only have 1 that will run 1500. The other 3 bad flashed when the USB hub died and had to start all over. So like a few others it seems I end up with a rig just making 25.2 18 x 1320 = 23.76 Gh/s 1 x 1500 = 1.5 Gh/s 25.26 Gh/s total
|
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2012, 06:26:56 PM |
|
[P]ool management Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit BFL 0: 41.5C | 1377.0/1370.3Mh/s | A:32 R:0 HW:0 U:10.21/m BFL 1: 40.2C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:63 R:0 HW:0 U:20.10/m BFL 2: 41.0C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:70 R:0 HW:0 U:22.33/m BFL 3: 40.7C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:52 R:0 HW:0 U:16.59/m BFL 4: 38.2C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:70 R:0 HW:0 U:22.33/m BFL 5: 42.4C | 1377.2/1370.3Mh/s | A: 5 R:0 HW:0 U: 1.60/m BFL 6: 47.4C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:64 R:0 HW:0 U:20.42/m BFL 7: 42.5C | 1377.0/1370.3Mh/s | A: 3 R:0 HW:0 U: 0.96/m BFL 8: 39.8C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 9: 43.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 10: 45.7C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:61 R:0 HW:0 U:19.46/m BFL 11: 38.1C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:54 R:0 HW:0 U:17.23/m BFL 12: 39.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:66 R:0 HW:0 U:21.06/m BFL 13: 41.6C | 1494.1/1461.7Mh/s | A:65 R:0 HW:0 U:20.74/m BFL 14: 39.0C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 15: 41.0C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:53 R:0 HW:0 U:16.91/m BFL 16: 37.5C | 1377.0/1324.6Mh/s | A:16 R:0 HW:0 U: 5.10/m BFL 17: 42.6C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:54 R:0 HW:0 U:17.23/m BFL 18: 39.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:51 R:0 HW:0 U:16.27/m
Note #'s 0,5,7,and 16 - a result of the 1320 FW in the auto-tune package. Don't use it!
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2012, 07:42:35 PM |
|
[P]ool management Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit BFL 0: 41.5C | 1377.0/1370.3Mh/s | A:32 R:0 HW:0 U:10.21/m BFL 1: 40.2C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:63 R:0 HW:0 U:20.10/m BFL 2: 41.0C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:70 R:0 HW:0 U:22.33/m BFL 3: 40.7C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:52 R:0 HW:0 U:16.59/m BFL 4: 38.2C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:70 R:0 HW:0 U:22.33/m BFL 5: 42.4C | 1377.2/1370.3Mh/s | A: 5 R:0 HW:0 U: 1.60/m BFL 6: 47.4C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:64 R:0 HW:0 U:20.42/m BFL 7: 42.5C | 1377.0/1370.3Mh/s | A: 3 R:0 HW:0 U: 0.96/m BFL 8: 39.8C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 9: 43.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 10: 45.7C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:61 R:0 HW:0 U:19.46/m BFL 11: 38.1C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:54 R:0 HW:0 U:17.23/m BFL 12: 39.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:66 R:0 HW:0 U:21.06/m BFL 13: 41.6C | 1494.1/1461.7Mh/s | A:65 R:0 HW:0 U:20.74/m BFL 14: 39.0C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:58 R:0 HW:0 U:18.51/m BFL 15: 41.0C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:53 R:0 HW:0 U:16.91/m BFL 16: 37.5C | 1377.0/1324.6Mh/s | A:16 R:0 HW:0 U: 5.10/m BFL 17: 42.6C | 1317.1/1279.0Mh/s | A:54 R:0 HW:0 U:17.23/m BFL 18: 39.8C | 1317.0/1279.0Mh/s | A:51 R:0 HW:0 U:16.27/m
Note #'s 0,5,7,and 16 - a result of the 1320 FW in the auto-tune package. Don't use it!
That's after only 3 minutes? Can you run it for an hour or more and see what you get?
|
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2012, 09:27:37 PM |
|
Trust me - it is borked! After flashing to the "good" 1320 FW...
BFL 0: 44.3C | 1310.2/1296.2Mh/s | A:157 R:0 HW:0 U:20.16/m BFL 1: 43.4C | 1309.8/1296.2Mh/s | A:125 R:0 HW:0 U:16.05/m BFL 2: 45.8C | 1310.3/1296.2Mh/s | A:150 R:0 HW:0 U:19.26/m BFL 3: 44.0C | 1310.3/1296.2Mh/s | A:137 R:0 HW:0 U:17.59/m BFL 4: 41.9C | 1310.8/1296.2Mh/s | A:141 R:0 HW:0 U:18.11/m BFL 5: 48.8C | 1310.8/1296.2Mh/s | A:148 R:0 HW:0 U:19.01/m BFL 6: 55.0C | 1311.2/1296.2Mh/s | A:123 R:0 HW:0 U:15.80/m BFL 7: 46.6C | 1312.0/1296.2Mh/s | A:123 R:0 HW:0 U:15.80/m BFL 8: 43.0C | 1312.3/1296.2Mh/s | A:141 R:0 HW:0 U:18.11/m BFL 9: 50.2C | 1313.2/1296.2Mh/s | A:124 R:0 HW:0 U:15.92/m BFL 10: 51.9C | 1313.4/1296.2Mh/s | A:137 R:0 HW:0 U:17.59/m BFL 11: 42.5C | 1314.6/1305.4Mh/s | A:147 R:0 HW:0 U:18.88/m BFL 12: 43.0C | 1314.8/1305.4Mh/s | A:143 R:0 HW:0 U:18.36/m BFL 13: 46.2C | 1478.2/1461.7Mh/s | A:140 R:0 HW:0 U:17.98/m BFL 14: 42.2C | 1315.0/1305.4Mh/s | A:142 R:0 HW:0 U:18.24/m BFL 15: 46.7C | 1315.2/1305.4Mh/s | A:148 R:0 HW:0 U:19.01/m BFL 16: 38.2C | 1315.5/1305.4Mh/s | A:136 R:0 HW:0 U:17.47/m BFL 17: 47.0C | 1316.1/1305.4Mh/s | A:137 R:0 HW:0 U:17.59/m BFL 18: 42.2C | 1316.7/1305.4Mh/s | A:130 R:0 HW:0 U:16.70/m
|
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
August 20, 2012, 08:06:04 AM |
|
JWU42,
Please run it for a longer period [10-30 min:-)] and show the result. Now Your 1.5GH/s unit has lower output than the other 1.3GH/s units. the total U: (right top, 346.6 => 24.8GH/s in my case) is the most valuable parameter.
cgminer version 2.6.4 - Started: [2012-08-16 21:59:11] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):20085.9 (avg):24946.7 Mh/s | Q:134080 A:1750545 R:11567 HW:0 E:1306% U:346.6/m TQ: 0 ST: 20 SS: 0 DW: 10970 NB: 544 LW: 2041019 GF: 257 RF: 0 Connected to ... with LP as user ... Block: 00000125a2cbb1e3782f1c1786e06d18... Started: [10:01:21] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [.]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit BFL 0: 46.2C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92339 R:617 HW: 0 U:18.28/m BFL 1: 46.6C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92051 R:627 HW: 0 U:18.22/m BFL 2: 37.4C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92288 R:631 HW: 0 U:18.27/m BFL 3: 41.6C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92114 R:577 HW: 0 U:18.24/m BFL 4: 45.8C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92542 R:609 HW: 0 U:18.32/m BFL 5: 36.4C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92144 R:632 HW: 0 U:18.24/m BFL 6: 40.2C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92315 R:588 HW: 0 U:18.28/m BFL 7: 35.8C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92002 R:583 HW: 0 U:18.22/m BFL 8: 39.3C | 1317.3/1312.9Mh/s | A:92414 R:594 HW:14 U:18.30/m BFL 9: 38.4C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92302 R:597 HW: 0 U:18.27/m BFL 10: 40.9C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92114 R:618 HW: 0 U:18.24/m BFL 11: 44.5C | 1317.3/1312.9Mh/s | A:91517 R:604 HW:11 U:18.12/m BFL 12: 41.2C | 1317.2/1312.4Mh/s | A:91711 R:636 HW:41 U:18.16/m BFL 13: 44.4C | 1317.3/1312.9Mh/s | A:91778 R:575 HW: 8 U:18.17/m BFL 14: 39.1C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92533 R:633 HW: 0 U:18.32/m BFL 15: 38.3C | 1317.2/1313.1Mh/s | A:91521 R:609 HW: 0 U:18.12/m BFL 16: 41.7C | 1317.3/1313.1Mh/s | A:92425 R:593 HW: 0 U:18.30/m BFL 17: 36.2C | 1317.3/1313.0Mh/s | A:92028 R:602 HW: 0 U:18.22/m BFL 18: 38.0C | 1317.2/1313.1Mh/s | A:92429 R:642 HW: 0 U:18.30/m --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 20, 2012, 11:12:39 AM |
|
JWU42,
Please run it for a longer period [10-30 min:-)] and show the result. Now Your 1.5GH/s unit has lower output than the other 1.3GH/s units. the total U: (right top, 346.6 => 24.8GH/s in my case) is the most valuable parameter.
Tytus, I don't need to run it longer when units are showing a U of ~1. Something is wrong. I have seen it before and confirmed it with Sonny - the reason he sent me the "good" 1320 FW. The FW is specifically the 1320 FW from the auto-tune package. This is NOT the same FW that the units are shipping with... With respect to the 1500 unit with a slightly lower U - yes - over a 60-90 minute duration it foxes itself. In that instance we are talking a ~2% difference. With the borked 1320 units it was 50% and worse. Current U is 350.4 after running about 8 hours.
|
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
August 20, 2012, 11:22:01 AM |
|
I was only wondering about the performance of the 1500 unit and whether it make sense in my case to test if any of my units could run at this speed. In any case Your total 350.4 shares/m (25.1GH/s) is a good result.
|
|
|
|
uck
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:57:58 AM |
|
I think a couple of entries were missed on the spreadsheet.... here's what I read
Date Ordered Shipped Quantity User 4/7/2012 7/31/2012 2 farfie 8/2/2012 1 fuxianhui888 8/3/2012 1 uck
|
|
|
|
fuxianhui888
|
|
August 22, 2012, 02:35:16 PM |
|
they said they don't accept mini rig order anymore,so I upgraded to mini rig sc,
|
|
|
|
tarrant_01 (OP)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:16:09 PM |
|
Maybe I should close this thread down then? Is it really that important to know when the last guy receives his mini-rig?
|
1P95gCUCw3Tjb7yyoYtW3ARZZQyTpFgk6H
|
|
|
tytus
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:31:00 PM |
|
Don't close it. It is still interesting to know that somebody received a Mini Rig. This means that SCs are not shipped yet.
|
|
|
|
tarrant_01 (OP)
|
|
August 22, 2012, 04:36:08 PM |
|
They could PM me and I could update the list and bump the thread still.
|
1P95gCUCw3Tjb7yyoYtW3ARZZQyTpFgk6H
|
|
|
|