jdebunt
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1010
|
 |
May 03, 2015, 06:58:52 PM |
|
Chinese pools are definitely dominating the charts. Interesting to see BTC China in 4th though  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 31, 2015, 10:42:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
July 07, 2015, 12:28:55 AM
Last edit: July 07, 2015, 01:30:05 AM by organofcorti |
|
|
|
|
|
Taras
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1053
Please do not PM me loan requests!
|
|
July 30, 2015, 05:59:19 AM |
|
I was wondering, is the raw data for the nice block maker heatmap available for download? I'm talking about this thing. I can't find it anywhere, but if it is available, I would totally love to see it. |
|
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
July 30, 2015, 09:44:58 AM |
|
I was wondering, is the raw data for the nice block maker heatmap available for download? I'm talking about this thing. I can't find it anywhere, but if it is available, I would totally love to see it. I don't have a way to make the raw data available, but I could post monthly (or per 4032 block) summaries to pastebin if you like. |
|
|
|
Taras
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1053
Please do not PM me loan requests!
|
|
July 30, 2015, 11:23:09 PM |
|
I was wondering, is the raw data for the nice block maker heatmap available for download? I'm talking about this thing. I can't find it anywhere, but if it is available, I would totally love to see it. I don't have a way to make the raw data available, but I could post monthly (or per 4032 block) summaries to pastebin if you like. That'd be really helpful. Would there be summaries all the way back to block 0? I'd like to research the behavior of mining pools over time. |
|
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
July 31, 2015, 12:30:40 AM |
|
I was wondering, is the raw data for the nice block maker heatmap available for download? I'm talking about this thing. I can't find it anywhere, but if it is available, I would totally love to see it. I don't have a way to make the raw data available, but I could post monthly (or per 4032 block) summaries to pastebin if you like. That'd be really helpful. Would there be summaries all the way back to block 0? I'd like to research the behavior of mining pools over time. Yes, but they're not very accurate before 2012. |
|
|
|
Sine(X)
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
August 02, 2015, 11:43:59 AM |
|
Who is 1DXRoTT67mCbhdHHL1it4J1xsSZHHnFxYR ?
|
|
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:53:19 PM |
|
Who is 1DXRoTT67mCbhdHHL1it4J1xsSZHHnFxYR ?
Not sure yet. |
|
|
|
|
bitsolutions
|
|
August 10, 2015, 01:05:50 PM |
|
Who is 1DXRoTT67mCbhdHHL1it4J1xsSZHHnFxYR ?
Telco 214 |
Mining Software Developer.
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
August 17, 2015, 01:26:17 AM |
|
Who is 1DXRoTT67mCbhdHHL1it4J1xsSZHHnFxYR ?
Telco 214I know who they're thought to be, but I don't have any proof yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
torepia
|
|
November 03, 2015, 12:51:12 PM |
|
Love your work!
|
|
|
|
|
RealMalatesta
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
|
|
November 03, 2015, 04:51:38 PM |
|
Thanks for your work. You're the man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
sloopy
|
|
November 04, 2015, 03:52:40 AM |
|
Followed @oocBlog
I enjoy reading your descriptions of the charts.
Is there a defining value to make it simple for some of us who look for simplicity --statistically speaking mining pps will have a higher probability to do X based on past performance? OR some derivative which is a canned response for someone who doesn't know where to mine?
Say make the most bitcoin mining at X if mining in western US
or X if mining in Western Europe? China?
Or, are there too many variables to be that specific, it is too much of a personal choice?
What keeps you going week after week publishing, now three times per week right?
I appreciate it and enjoy what you do. I use your information as a reference and spotting trends. I don't do anything with that information but it is great fun.
|
Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
November 04, 2015, 12:36:47 PM |
|
Followed @oocBlog
I enjoy reading your descriptions of the charts.
Is there a defining value to make it simple for some of us who look for simplicity --statistically speaking mining pps will have a higher probability to do X based on past performance? OR some derivative which is a canned response for someone who doesn't know where to mine?
Say make the most bitcoin mining at X if mining in western US
or X if mining in Western Europe? China?
Or, are there too many variables to be that specific, it is too much of a personal choice?
Hey Sloopy, What is it that you want to do? If it's estimating future mining income, there's this post: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/917-estimating-future-bitcoin-mining.htmlIt might answer some of your questions. What keeps you going week after week publishing, now three times per week right?
Heh, I often ask myself the same thing. Sheer bloody mindedness and habit, mostly. Also, the fact that I have readers that enjoy what I do keeps me going, and every now and then I get a donation which gives me a bit of a buzz. I appreciate it and enjoy what you do. I use your information as a reference and spotting trends. I don't do anything with that information but it is great fun.
Care to share any profitable insights?  |
|
|
|
|
bitsolutions
|
|
November 25, 2015, 01:51:29 AM |
|
FYI these two generation addresses are not unknown they are A-XBT, it looks like most block explorers just aren't detecting the addition yet.: 13DavHXHVQGUCNUP7eouc5kCZBhVDV2TDS 1MFsp2txCPwMMBJjNNeKaduGGs8Wi1Ce7X |
Mining Software Developer.
|
|
|
organofcorti (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
November 25, 2015, 02:30:26 AM |
|
FYI these two generation addresses are not unknown they are A-XBT, it looks like most block explorers just aren't detecting the addition yet.: 13DavHXHVQGUCNUP7eouc5kCZBhVDV2TDS 1MFsp2txCPwMMBJjNNeKaduGGs8Wi1Ce7X Thanks for that. I'll see if I can find out more about them than just a public listing before I add them - is it anyone you know? |
|
|
|
|
bitsolutions
|
|
November 25, 2015, 02:57:41 AM |
|
Thanks for that. I'll see if I can find out more about them than just a public listing before I add them - is it anyone you know?
Not someone I know but reasonably sure it's accurate since they mentioned the coinbase sig change on github before actually changing the config on their pool. |
Mining Software Developer.
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 07, 2016, 11:38:59 PM |
|
So ... I was trying to work out the CDF[Erl] of a pool getting 150 blocks a month, for 3 months, with mean difficulty of 1.25 (luck of 80%) I can't get a reasonable result at the wolfram site it keeps telling me it's 1, so yeah I guess that means it should be ever so rare  http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=CDF%5BErlangDistribution%5B450%2C+450%5D%2C++1.25%5DUsing my own code I get the same effective answer cdf_gamma_Q is 0.999997 (and cdf_gamma_P is 2.7091e-06) So that's like saying (in my non technical words) the chance of doing that badly or worse is like 1 chance in 369,126? What am I doing wrong? (and then it would be even worse with a higher number of blocks ...) |
|
|
|
|
