Bitcoin Forum
May 19, 2024, 06:13:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: undervolt antminer s3  (Read 26408 times)
untenops
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2015, 07:15:03 PM
 #41

Bitmain stats for the S5

3.   When better power efficiency is needed in the future due to higher network difficulties, you may want to buy some special PSUs 9V DC with more than 10A output, which will allow you to have a 0.2J/GH mining efficiency, but at lower hashing speed.

9V at 10A is only 90 watts.  You can find 9V PSU around this size, I'm looking at one now that's 16A.  Wondering if I could use it on the S3? 
valtic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 07:05:40 PM
Last edit: January 20, 2015, 07:28:03 AM by valtic
 #42

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new
neegeeboo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 08, 2015, 06:29:09 AM
 #43

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?
valtic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 12, 2015, 04:43:53 PM
 #44

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598
soy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013



View Profile
February 14, 2015, 09:03:27 PM
Last edit: February 15, 2015, 10:33:56 PM by soy
 #45

Just throwing this out there.  Bitmain mentions running the S5s with a 9 volt PSU for better efficiency.  Has anybody tried this on a S3?  Would it be possible?  Would be nice if we could just plug in a 9 volt PSU without having to do any internal mods to the S3s.  Of course I dont know whats required to run the S5s on 9 volt either.  

I run my miners off adjustable power supplies.  Right now I'm for the first time taking a Kill-A-Watt and measuring the stats at the wall for my two S3's, two S3+'s and single C1.  

The Kill-A-Watt had been on the C1 for 1097 hours, used 921KW.

The two S3's need some explaining.  I bought those on Amazon before I realized the advantage of buying directly.  The first from CryptoCrane in the mid-west was excellent.  The second from Pines Computer in Florida was a dog in a box that had been opened on the bottom and resealed, having two crappy hashboards.   I should have returned the S3 to Pines Computer and taken my Amazon refund but instead I opened it up and re-applied heat sink compound.  Still ran lousy but now I had worked on it.  I ended up taking one board out and putting it in the good miner from CryptoCrane and now both run about the same, each having a board that's not so good, one coming up with an x and the other coming up with a - , both running in the high 420's but constantly dropping and getting restarted from a short program.

As I said I'm in the process of measuring stats of the 5 miners.  I put the Kill-A-Watt in the S3 from Pines because I had to reboot it due to a 0000000- 00000000 chain.  After an hour it was running at 389 watts, 4.84 amps.  I should note that includes a small 120vac fan I picked up at Walmart and point in to the intake fan.  I have one of those on each S3 and they both have a single bad board now.

I check the S3 from CryptCrane (now having one of the bad boards from Pines in Florida) and see 399 watts at the wall and 4.72 amps but it hasn't been running an hour since putting in my one Kill-A-Watt.

After I get stats on all my miners, stats for at least an hour's duration, I'll see what the lowest level I can reliably set my variable supplies to and try running the Pines for an hour on the Kill-A-Watt.  I can probably get 10.5vdc for a test.  

I'll get back to you on if the lower supply voltage shows a significant change in at the wall wattage.

I have considered measuring the dc current in but I would use a 25 watt 1% .1 ohm resistor and if I'm getting 85% efficiency from my supplies then the 4.84 watts@120vac, PF .66 or 31.68 amps @12vdc, I squared R will be 100 watts so no go with the .1 ohm 25 watt resistor.  I was thinking of buying shunts from China but then why.  I'm scraping to keep these running with economic effectiveness.

I'd like to see somebody in China offer 50 amp and 100 amp shunts having small parasitic digital readouts.  With those my balancing power supplies would be a snap.

soy

The second S3+ is running its hour so meanwhile I dropped the voltage on the S3 from Pines down to 10.23vdc, min I could get for now but will be able to get down to low 9v's with a resistor change.  More and I'd worry about the supplies.  There's no Kill-A-Watt on it but it seems to be running, albeit at a lower hashrate.  ...later - up 27 minutes and the hashrate has picked up to 440GH/s avg. but it usually runs almost normal for an hour or two then drops and right now it's cooling.  So, I'm going to shut it down and see if I can get it running at about 9.5vdc with the Kill-A-Watt.  

...nuts, could only get it down to 9.9vdc given my available options without breaking out a soldering iron.  Wake up is 401 watts compared to wakeup at 12vdc and 389 watts.  First blush says no power savings from reducing the voltage into the miner.  One would expect something given the fans run slower.  But fans are pulse width controlled and if the pulses are wider but at a lower voltage this might mean higher current?  DC motors run more efficiently at a higher voltage don't they given a better back emf?

I think my next step is to drop the voltage in on one of the S3+'s and look for a power savings.  Then put the good board back in the first S3, the good one from CryptoCrane and get the two sucky boards back in the second S3 from Pines Computer in Florida selling on Amazon.  I'll look to see if there had been any mods to the voltage regulators, and check the ASICs are correct.  I'll measure resistor values at the voltage regulators but my guess is China realized Pines is a slock shop and sent them a crappy product.

Just went back and corrected the wakeup voltage of the S3 at 12 volts to 389watts and after an hour it was drawing 390 watts.  So, the wakeup at 401 watts @ 9.9vdc looks like a 3% power increase.

Interesting - the 9.9vdc is causing one of the boards to give me a fan speed of 15300 while the other fan is 1560.  First time I've had a fan speed an order of magnitude high.

The 12v 1hr stats were 390watts, 4.84amps, 120.6VAC, .66PF, 583VA $238/year
The 9.9v 1hr stats were 400watts, 5.00amps, 118.9VAC, .67PF, 594VA $256/year

I'll let it run like this overnight and see if the stats settle.  Wall voltage changes with neighbors returning home after work and dinner getting cooked.  A 7.5% cost increase per year.  Interesting to see if it effects the hashrate drop.  Really wish I hadn't put one of the bad boards in the good miner right now.

Of course I'm taking my supplies out of their comfort zone.  The miner efficiency may have improved while the supplies' efficiency dropped.  Can't really tell without high current shunts.
-------------
Now having shut down the first S3 from CryptoCrane in the mid-west and the second S3 from Pines Computer in Florida (open box at bottom and resealed, two slow hashing boards), and having put back to original configuration of 2 good boards in the unit from the mid-west, I've fired up the good S3 while set at 12.0vdc for a 1 hour run.  I'll take readings then raise the voltage to 12.6vdc and give it another hour.  Meanwhile I'll carefully clean and rebuild the S3 from Florida with its original slow boards.  I plan to take some time and measure that resistor dictating voltage on the 8 regulators.  Kind of does reflect life.  So many aged retirees in Florida ripe for the picking by scam artists and street people living rough in the warm weather, crime is high.  They elect politicians that claim to represent law and order.  Such a high rate of criminals on TV tracked down have some history in Florida.  The BFL honcho got convicted of postal mail fraud in Florida.  The criminals range from street people all the way up.  Texas likewise.  If a Florida politician gets elected to a national office in 2016 expect the middle class economy to be impaired similar to my mining with the crappy S3 from Florida.

The good S3 is running and reading taken without the external 120VAC fan.  When the slow S3 is up I'll put both fans on it but its reading aren't useful.
-------------
Before putting #2 (from Florida) back together, I checked some resistors for consistency.  R14 as measured from the gold pad to the junction of R14 and the capacitor was consistent on one board and generally 2% lower than the other hashing board and the higher measuring board had a greater variation among the 8 resistors.  So, for the highest measuring resistors I took a #2 pencil and brought the highest down to a consistent average that being 2% higher than the other board.  Time will tell if one of the two boards improves.  

---------------

Decided to take a 3rd reading of the good S3 but at 9.7vdc.  Interesting result at wakeup - both fans read an order of magnitude high.  Two good hashing boards.

--------------------

So, for my setup, with 12vdc datum, these are the results:

12.0vdc  datum
12.7vdc  cost 104%
9.7vdc    cost 107%

Clearly I should run at 12vdc and look elsewhere for efficiency.


soy

Fan speeds now within correct ballpark range - this at 12vdc.  So, fan speed an order of magnitude high - it's the power supply.
RayJay
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2015, 04:01:04 AM
 #46

Hi soy,
If you really looking to improve efficiency then you have to down-clock the S3, the sweet spot is 150Mhz.
Once you drop the clock you should be able to lower the voltage even further down than 9v on your power supply.
I like the idea of simply moding the power-supply instead of moding each of the 16 step down voltage converters on the s3 board, which is a major p.i.t.a.
I would really like to see your results at 150Mhz and see if your power supply mod can match my S3 pencil mod efficency (180w @ 305 Gh/s on the wall)

Regards,
-Jay
BitBlitz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 250


Turning money into heat since 2011.


View Profile
February 23, 2015, 04:45:06 AM
 #47

From what I see in the (generally low res) S5 board pics I could find, I don't see any chips that could be buck converters or FETs capable of handling the current draw of the BM1384 ASICs.  Whether the ASICS are is series or using a voltage divider-- that is likely why lowering the power supply voltage changes the efficiency of the an S5.  If anybody knows what they are using to drop the voltage to the ASICS, I'd like to know.

The S3s have voltage regulators on the board, which would explain why the overall power draw is about the same when the power supply voltage is lowered.  Drop the voltage, raise the current supplying the regulator.  In my experience; the efficiency will be a little bit lower with a reduced power supply voltage, because the slightly higher higher current will result in more wire and board trace heating.


I see the value of Bitcoin, so I don't worry about the price...
clizity
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 18, 2015, 03:30:42 AM
 #48

Hi all i'm back. look at http://www.digchip.com/datasheets/parts/datasheet/477/TPS53355-pdf.php

its the data on the tps53355. look at fig 17,18,19,20  shows a about a 3% inceras lowering the voltage but only in the 4-6 amp range. + or - lowers efficiency. also the lower the out put voltage lower the efficiency.

so this chip is at best 90% with a 90% psu so give the power co. 19% of you btc on a good day. if i have to take a stab at it i would have to say 75% makes it to the asic.

the further you under volt the less the PSU efficiency. with the increase in hash rate and lesser efficiency it may be brake even or worse.

i say we need to look else ware. fans at 100% X2 is about 25watts on a 90% psu is a 4 watt loss per miner.
go AC fans or one big one.

im looking at solar. roi in 4years and if this BTC thing is a bust can sell KWHs back to the power co and 90% efficiency.also standard solar pannals can be configured as 12v or 6v.

fyi the asic blade will continue to work at the lowest 4v and the control board will cut out at 5V.

hope it helps.
Moria843
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


Found Lost beach - quiet now


View Profile
May 07, 2015, 05:05:51 PM
 #49

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598

I've undervoltaged my S1s and am considering for S3s. But I thought with the right firmware you could undervoltage the S3s directly in firmware without having to do hardware mods or use the HB-lead method like many of us did on the S1s. Let me know where I'm going wrong and whether the mods make a significant increase in efficiency or reduction of J/Gh. If there's a link to a proven/best method that outlines firmware needed, steps required, etc., please let me know. Thanks.

Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7892


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
May 09, 2015, 03:19:48 AM
 #50

Hi soy,
If you really looking to improve efficiency then you have to down-clock the S3, the sweet spot is 150Mhz.
Once you drop the clock you should be able to lower the voltage even further down than 9v on your power supply.
I like the idea of simply moding the power-supply instead of moding each of the 16 step down voltage converters on the s3 board, which is a major p.i.t.a.
I would really like to see your results at 150Mhz and see if your power supply mod can match my S3 pencil mod efficency (180w @ 305 Gh/s on the wall)

Regards,
-Jay

   I need photos of where to rub the pencil.  what spots are the resistors located. thank you

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Moria843
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


Found Lost beach - quiet now


View Profile
May 13, 2015, 03:33:22 PM
Last edit: May 13, 2015, 03:44:58 PM by Moria843
 #51

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598

Thanks valtic for the great post and images. I plan on trying but want to avoid creating bricks and have a few questions first:

I don't have the advance config voltage setting (I assume it should be under Miner Config -> Advance tab with freq adjustment).

Do I need to upgrade to antMiner_S320141013.bin and then to antMiner_S320150109.bin (latest) or can I go straight to the latest firmware?

Also, any advice on things to do before and after firmware update to avoid bricking?

On the Bitmain firmware page it states the latest firmware "disable VDD adjustment function".
Does that mean it gets rid of the voltage adjustment or am I missing something?

Also I thought when you changed the voltage setting in the advanced tab that you were changing the chip voltage and we didn't need to do the hardware mods as we did on our S1s. Can someone explain?

Also what do you mean by
parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor
.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k
Do you mean we get 0.68v if we parallel a 2.2k and we get 0.75v if we parallel a 6.8k?
or are you saying some S3s have different resistor (either a 2.2 or 6.8k) that we will be paralleling with
Do you mean we get 0.68v if we parallel a 2.2k and we have a 2.2k and we get 0.75v if we parallel a 2.2k and we have a 6.8k?

Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
numnutz2009
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387
Merit: 254


View Profile
May 14, 2015, 05:14:06 AM
 #52

I dont see a point in undervolting s3's or s3+'s or even spondoolies miners. Even with spondoolies which allows for control over the voltages lowering the pcie power from 12v starts increasing the power usage at the wall. The psu i used has a range from 12v all the way down to about 9.7v and the lower i went the higher the consumption was. Thats with a sp20 that is underclocked using the web interface so it wasnt maxed out or even at stock speed so u would thing it would make the watts per gh go down but it just kept goin up. I went from about 600w with 12v to over 700w on a bit more then 11v. I didnt want to push the psu ne furthereven though i could have but really the efficiency wont go ne further. The s3's r the same way too.

I did however find a way to make s5's much much more efficient at slower hashrates but the biggest thing most will notice is the fan noise is much much lower and i might even go as far as to say its quieter then the s3 double fans but maybe im used to it so ne thing lower is much much lower lol. The only other thing to do before considering the undervolting as being a guaranteed solution is to get longer cables that run from the boards to the controller so i would need 4 per controller....2 would be the norm length while the other 2 would be a few inches longer. If ne one has the part number for the cable connector please pm me with it so i can buy some and make my own if bitmain doesnt sell slightly longer ones separately but im waiting for them to reply.
Moria843
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


Found Lost beach - quiet now


View Profile
May 14, 2015, 03:08:13 PM
 #53

I dont see a point in undervolting s3's or s3+'s or even spondoolies miners. Even with spondoolies which allows for control over the voltages lowering the pcie power from 12v starts increasing the power usage at the wall. The psu i used has a range from 12v all the way down to about 9.7v and the lower i went the higher the consumption was. Thats with a sp20 that is underclocked using the web interface so it wasnt maxed out or even at stock speed so u would thing it would make the watts per gh go down but it just kept goin up. I went from about 600w with 12v to over 700w on a bit more then 11v. I didnt want to push the psu ne furthereven though i could have but really the efficiency wont go ne further. The s3's r the same way too.

I did however find a way to make s5's much much more efficient at slower hashrates but the biggest thing most will notice is the fan noise is much much lower and i might even go as far as to say its quieter then the s3 double fans but maybe im used to it so ne thing lower is much much lower lol. The only other thing to do before considering the undervolting as being a guaranteed solution is to get longer cables that run from the boards to the controller so i would need 4 per controller....2 would be the norm length while the other 2 would be a few inches longer. If ne one has the part number for the cable connector please pm me with it so i can buy some and make my own if bitmain doesnt sell slightly longer ones separately but im waiting for them to reply.

You're missing the point. I'm not interested in lowering the PSU voltage, I don't believe that increases efficiency. But lowering the voltage to the ASICs and making other tweaks can increase the efficiency. I've kept my old S1s profitable for an extra 6 months using that technique. If on the S3, you can go from 0.83J/Gh to 0.63J/Gh you're doing the same amount of hashing with 75% of the energy. So my $400 electric bill goes to $300 while doing the same amount of overall hashing, although it may now take longer to do. An analogy would be making improvements to your car and/or driving techniques where now you're going 100 miles on 3 gallons of gas instead of the 4 gallons required prior to the improvements. I especially like to do in the summer as it also reduces heat output and thereby reducing cooling costs adding to the efficiency increase.

Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
Moria843
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


Found Lost beach - quiet now


View Profile
June 02, 2015, 05:11:25 PM
 #54

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598

I was able to duplicate these results on 2 units by paralleling a 2.2k across the resistor between VFB and Vout for each TPS53355 switcher (8 per board). That's all I did, I didn't upgrade my firmware or change voltage settings in firmware (not available in mine and read that the setting doesn't do anything anyway). I tested efficiency at different frequencies and the best results I achieved are:

Unit 1: 0.645 J/Gh @ 193 MHz
Unit 2: 0.625 J/Gh @ 175 MHz

At $0.13/kWh and current BTC price I'm profitable again, but just barely.

I have 3 more S3+ units to convert and did notice that one of the boards is a different (newer) version. I don't see the TPS53355 switcher on it or a voltage divider circuit that I can modify to change the hashing chips voltage. Any info on the newer board appreciated. I can post pictures of mod and detailed drawing if anyone is interested.

Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
elrippo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 13, 2015, 04:34:33 PM
 #55

In respect to RayJay who provided the pictures and the instruction, i want to share this with you.

It is quite simple after you have dismanteld your S3.
Find the resistor with 2,088KOhm


Measure the resistance



Apply pencil to the side of the resistor until you are somewhere between 0,900 and 0,950KOhm.
With 0,900KOhm and a the Frequency set to 150Mhz my S3 is hashing at 310GH/S with 185Watt on the Wall constantly.

Happy mining  Grin

For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
PlanetCrypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 16, 2015, 03:16:39 PM
 #56

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598

I was able to duplicate these results on 2 units by paralleling a 2.2k across the resistor between VFB and Vout for each TPS53355 switcher (8 per board). That's all I did, I didn't upgrade my firmware or change voltage settings in firmware (not available in mine and read that the setting doesn't do anything anyway). I tested efficiency at different frequencies and the best results I achieved are:

Unit 1: 0.645 J/Gh @ 193 MHz
Unit 2: 0.625 J/Gh @ 175 MHz

At $0.13/kWh and current BTC price I'm profitable again, but just barely.

I have 3 more S3+ units to convert and did notice that one of the boards is a different (newer) version. I don't see the TPS53355 switcher on it or a voltage divider circuit that I can modify to change the hashing chips voltage. Any info on the newer board appreciated. I can post pictures of mod and detailed drawing if anyone is interested.

I've got a dozen (12) S3's and a similar amount of C1's.
Need to do this mod on all of them.
I have strong electronics and soldering skills.
So soldering in a 2.2K 1% 1/8W metal film resistor across the 2.088K SMD resistor isn't an issue. A time consuming PITA, but easily doable.
Understand everything (and the theory behind it) in the post except the "HW .003 20 ment. idle".
Is that a S/W configuration thingy?

WTF over? LOL.

Thanks in advance.

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
eyeknock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 17, 2015, 12:25:57 PM
 #57

Is there a setting with the new firmware to make the S3 more energy efficent?
Does changing the voltage and frequenty lead to better power efficiency.

No!
the voltage field is obviously without any function.

Same as the S5, it also has no voltage settings.

well thats why s5 consumption is less than s3, it is pretty cool right now and cant be lowered Wink
Moria843
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 442
Merit: 250


Found Lost beach - quiet now


View Profile
June 18, 2015, 01:02:26 PM
 #58

success undervolt ant s3+ 0.63j/gh  .68v on my digital tester

305 gh
freq 150
config voltage 065
new firmware

hw .003 30ment. idle

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.new#new

Has anyone else tried this and had the same success?

antminer s3+ undervolt

here is the better result

update new firmware
310gh
freq. 150
adv. config voltage 065
HW .003 20 ment. idle

how to drop voltage

parallel 2.2k resistor on VFB to Vout resistor

.68 for 2.2k
.75 for 6.8k

https://i.imgur.com/mxxI2t6.png
https://i.imgur.com/Zw3El3U.png
https://i.imgur.com/VL9AGvu.png
https://i.imgur.com/5oGshqw.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10214088#msg10214088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.msg10222598#msg10222598

I was able to duplicate these results on 2 units by paralleling a 2.2k across the resistor between VFB and Vout for each TPS53355 switcher (8 per board). That's all I did, I didn't upgrade my firmware or change voltage settings in firmware (not available in mine and read that the setting doesn't do anything anyway). I tested efficiency at different frequencies and the best results I achieved are:

Unit 1: 0.645 J/Gh @ 193 MHz
Unit 2: 0.625 J/Gh @ 175 MHz

At $0.13/kWh and current BTC price I'm profitable again, but just barely.

I have 3 more S3+ units to convert and did notice that one of the boards is a different (newer) version. I don't see the TPS53355 switcher on it or a voltage divider circuit that I can modify to change the hashing chips voltage. Any info on the newer board appreciated. I can post pictures of mod and detailed drawing if anyone is interested.

I've got a dozen (12) S3's and a similar amount of C1's.
Need to do this mod on all of them.
I have strong electronics and soldering skills.
So soldering in a 2.2K 1% 1/8W metal film resistor across the 2.088K SMD resistor isn't an issue. A time consuming PITA, but easily doable.
Understand everything (and the theory behind it) in the post except the "HW .003 20 ment. idle".
Is that a S/W configuration thingy?

WTF over? LOL.

Thanks in advance.

I think the "HW .003 20 ment. idle" is referencing the hardware error rate/typo. I also used 1/8 W resistors and it is a PITA. I had a friend who works with me and is a certified solderer do using his soldering station with microscope setup. He said it was more difficult than he expected and had to tin the leads and really clean the boards to get the solder to take. Since then also modified 2 more units; best efficiency depends on frequency setting and they range from 125 to 193 MHz and of course they generate a lot less heat.

Hot time, summer in the city, back of my mine getting hot & gritty!!!
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7892


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2015, 03:35:47 AM
 #59

hey guys thanks for some clear photos on under volting.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
elrippo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 28, 2015, 10:17:43 AM
 #60


You are welcome Cheesy

For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!