1986
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2014, 02:56:26 PM |
|
Thank you for sharing. Satoshi accounts will be the main target for hackers to gain access and information. I am pretty sure he is not stupid enough to re use his old accounts with his name!
Cheers
Well, you could argue he was stupid enough to use a email account that could be hacked so easy. While I don't doubt his intelligence it's easy to slip up somewhere and very hard to remain 100% safe and secure and anoymous.
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2014, 04:02:23 AM |
|
Thank you for sharing. Satoshi accounts will be the main target for hackers to gain access and information. I am pretty sure he is not stupid enough to re use his old accounts with his name!
Cheers
I'm pretty sure he's not going to be defending those old usernames either. If he did, someone could use his actions to track him down. If you want to be anonymous, you have to just walk away from your old points of contact and abandon them to whatever happens. So at this point, it's his old ISP's that control the user names, and they will do whatever's their policy with 'em. Satoshi would have to be insane to try to hang onto them or prevent others from getting them.
|
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2014, 08:35:39 AM |
|
This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2014, 10:29:51 PM |
|
This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.
Why should he give anyone a reason to think otherwise, if he wants to remain anonymous?
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2014, 10:31:20 PM |
|
This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.
Well for his own safety he will be happy if the world will believe in it IMO - everything is possible. .
|
|
|
|
Skatebird
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 04:57:57 AM |
|
Its bad we cant know who he is !! Dont understand why he want so much to stay anonymous :/
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 05:29:00 AM |
|
Look, "Satoshi" was a construction made explicitly for the purpose of launching Bitcoin.
That purpose is fulfilled. The person who created "Satoshi" has no further need for him. Thus ends the story.
|
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 06:55:05 AM |
|
Look, "Satoshi" was a construction made explicitly for the purpose of launching Bitcoin.
That purpose is fulfilled. The person who created "Satoshi" has no further need for him. Thus ends the story.
If not there wasn't these 1 million bitcoins in his wallets, which are untouched since his disappearance. There are many ways to spend bitcoins and still be anonymous. Did you know that? Oh and btw: if he really wanted to stay hidden, why is he letting random hackers have access to 11000 of his private emails instead of simply deleting all content before he vanishes?
|
|
|
|
bithound
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 10:16:27 AM |
|
This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.
He is not dead. I think SN is not 1 person, he is a big company.
|
|
|
|
doubleredrolex
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 211
Merit: 100
I Believe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 10:20:46 AM |
|
Prob a group of people.. waiting for BTC to hit $10,000 before they cash out. They prob have another million BTC in other random wallets.
|
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 10:23:13 AM |
|
This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.
He is not dead. I think SN is not 1 person, he is a big company. A "big company" would have certanly cashed out their 1Mio BTC when the price was over 1000USD.
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2014, 10:37:13 AM |
|
To imagine one knows the minds or motivations of others is the height of hubris.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 06:17:48 PM Last edit: October 21, 2014, 06:51:48 PM by Gyrsur |
|
so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again? so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever! Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: satoshin@gmx.comTechnical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 07:22:04 PM |
|
so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again? so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever! Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: satoshin@gmx.comTechnical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamotoHe used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 07:36:30 PM |
|
so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again? so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever! Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: satoshin@gmx.comTechnical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamotoHe used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org. so his vistomail.com Email address still works. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 08:59:02 PM |
|
so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again? so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever! Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: satoshin@gmx.comTechnical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamotoHe used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org. so his vistomail.com Email address still works. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Folks, when you burn an identity, it doesn't matter whether an account remains activated. This speculation is a waste of your time. Its even better for anonymity when one of these gets hacked because then there are multiple trails from multiple people touching it. If someone tried to link the real "satoshi" to any of these accounts, it might not even be our dear friend, it could end up being just the first person to have hacked it after he left it empty and open. Yes, Satoshi is dead, long live Satoshi. Move along, nothing to see here.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 09:12:18 PM |
|
so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again? so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever! Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: satoshin@gmx.comTechnical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamotoHe used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org. so his vistomail.com Email address still works. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Folks, when you burn an identity, it doesn't matter whether an account remains activated. This speculation is a waste of your time. Its even better for anonymity when one of these gets hacked because then there are multiple trails from multiple people touching it. If someone tried to link the real "satoshi" to any of these accounts, it might not even be our dear friend, it could end up being just the first person to have hacked it after he left it empty and open. Yes, Satoshi is dead, long live Satoshi. Move along, nothing to see here. he is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.
|
|
|
|
Cryddit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1132
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 22, 2014, 07:15:20 PM |
|
He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.
Not. Satoshi was never a human. Satoshi was a pseudonym. It got used to do something important, and that thing is done. That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid. Therefore he will never use it again.
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
★ RipDice - Provably fair dice game ★
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 22, 2014, 07:24:56 PM |
|
He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.
Not. Satoshi was never a human. Satoshi was a pseudonym. It got used to do something important, and that thing is done. That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid. Therefore he will never use it again. Who would want to harm satoshi?
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 22, 2014, 08:04:05 PM |
|
He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.
Not. Satoshi was never a human. Satoshi was a pseudonym. It got used to do something important, and that thing is done. That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid. Therefore he will never use it again. Who would want to harm satoshi? It matters not. No one wanted to harm Princess Diana, but that didn't save her from the negative effects of notoriety. Let it go.
|
|
|
|
|