[ANN] MonetaryUnit [MUE] - POS. MasterNodes. Funding. Governance. Services. Devs

[cinnamon_carter]

no disrespect to anyone's work intended, I am not commenting on the virus total of any wallets--- other than the one I compiled had a virus total one

which was the good old

ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe , same link as was posted a few pages prior on thread

https://github.com/cinnamoncoin/MUE-Src/releases

Hey dev.......just went to update my wallet bud and very concerned with what I am seeing!  Running this new wallet through VirusTotal, I am getting 31 infections!!  Been around this game for a while bud and am quite used to false positives but there is NO way I can use a wallet with that many coming up and they are not all related to the miner in the wallet.  This number is INSANE compare to anything I have seen in crypto, I simply cannot use this wallet man.....this is just crazy!

Can we get a wallet without the built in miner or something so we can KNOW we have a clean wallet?

[1713533015]

1713533015

[Mue]

I'm sure no one will think there is any disrespect

Thanks for your input and support cinnamon_carter, it's appreciated.
It's pretty clear the minerd software and the additional dlls associated with that, cause virustotal to have a bit of a meltdown, and as you indicate, without those, virus total is just a single hit;

"Have a look at this (without the mining software), only 1/56 on virus total
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/4bb81af5a18f44b02d177fe2c0bc065fe660e2d54a5849a1940b1f0fabbb2185/analysis/

download link
https://mega.co.nz/#!TFUz1BZD!kt4Y61HBYCsFIHEmFNebvIRBiXuhWCPPDbHsdqAg0yA"

It's always good to be vigilant, and if the source can be "trusted" then it is good to keep in mind that if mining software is combined with the wallet software flags will be waved by virustotal.  Mining software like minerd is essentially password cracking software, trying to "guess" the next hash, so it's no surprise really.
In fact, I can't even download most wallets in Chrome now, not just the MUE wallet as Chrome thinks most of them are malicious..sigh...

Thanks again for your input, it is appreciated

no disrespect to anyone's work intended, I am not commenting on the virus total of any wallets--- other than the one I compiled had a virus total one

which was the good old

ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe , same link as was posted a few pages prior on thread

https://github.com/cinnamoncoin/MUE-Src/releases

Hey dev.......just went to update my wallet bud and very concerned with what I am seeing!  Running this new wallet through VirusTotal, I am getting 31 infections!!  Been around this game for a while bud and am quite used to false positives but there is NO way I can use a wallet with that many coming up and they are not all related to the miner in the wallet.  This number is INSANE compare to anything I have seen in crypto, I simply cannot use this wallet man.....this is just crazy!

Can we get a wallet without the built in miner or something so we can KNOW we have a clean wallet?

[drakoin]

Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was.
I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE.
This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE.
With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...

I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0  "sendmany.sh"

[Mue]

Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was.
I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE.
This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE.
With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...

I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0  "sendmany.sh"

Thank you, will do just that

[Mue]

Here's a pre-release I've been working on. It includes a few bug fixes and Coin Control for moving small amounts into one address, among other things.
For your convenience, I have also uploaded a windows binary of uncle-bobs minerd in a separate zip.

https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/releases/tag/1.0.0.0-b20e016

I marked it as pre-release because it hasn't been extensively tested.

Testing going really well.
Coin control is working great....would be very nice if there was a "wallet defrag" button that automatically did the coin control stuff...just sayin

Testing the 3 different minerd versions, I found a 30% performance increase using the "minerd-avx" version as compared to the old minerd version.
That's a pretty good performance boost by anyones standards.

[Mue]

A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mine

Dear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine.

Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc
I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway.

My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by;

• Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
• Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
• Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)

Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042
and we see where the project goes?

Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome

[drakoin]

Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was.
I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE.
This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE.
With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...

I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0  "sendmany.sh"

Thank you, will do just that

I have actually added MUE to the examples (and donation address *g*)
in my script now, and migrated the script from bitcointalk into my github:
https://github.com/drakoin/LinuxWallet/blob/master/sendmany.sh

Explanations are still in that thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167
By the way, my script works with any linux wallet of ANY currency that supports the 'sendtoaddress' and 'getbalance' RPC API calls!

VERY useful for bundling up small transactions that come from mining.

[theboccet]

Hello MUE community!!!

We are announcing the DRAW of this week!!
please check our blockolotto.com for more details
Or our twitter account twitter.com/BlockOLottO
Please refer to our blockolotto thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=871903.new#new
good luck miners!!

thank you for supporting us.

[Mue]

A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mine

Dear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine.

Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc
I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway.

My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by;

• Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
• Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
• Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)

Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042
and we see where the project goes?

Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome

Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability? 

[Mue]

A short post about the design of the coin release aimed to stabilise inflation & fiat value over the long term
http://www.monetaryunit.org/muestuff/slowing-inflation-rate-of-monetaryunit/

[theboccet]

CONGRATULATIONS
We announced the winner of the DRAW 6
He won a great amount of 100.000MUE

please check our www.blockolotto.com for more details
Or our twitter account https://twitter.com/BlockOLottO

Thank you for participating and supporting MonetaryUnit Coin.
thank you MUE community.

[theboccet]

A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mine

Dear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine.

Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc
I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway.

My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by;

• Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
• Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
• Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)

Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042
and we see where the project goes?

Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome

Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability? 

personally i have a preference for the burning but i have another suggestion about MUE coin.
I never seen a quark based coin with POS.Is there a possibility to have this on quark algo?If yes it will be a huge update for MUE to have burned coins and POS with coins control option.
what about this MUE?!!!!

[Mue]

A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mine

Dear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine.

Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc
I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway.

My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by;

• Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
• Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
• Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
• Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)

Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042
and we see where the project goes?

Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome

Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability? 

personally i have a preference for the burning but i have another suggestion about MUE coin.
I never seen a quark based coin with POS.Is there a possibility to have this on quark algo?If yes it will be a huge update for MUE to have burned coins and POS with coins control option.
what about this MUE?!!!!

Thanks for the feedback, I'll wait a little more time to see if any further opinion is given.

[Mue]

Just set up our MonetaryUnit forum
www.MUE.club

Please visit and register.  We are also offering 1000 MUE to all new accounts, please visit the external link below only, do not post your wallet address in this thread.
Thanks
http://www.mue.club/post/all-new-forum-users-get-1000-mue-7298523

[Mue]

We have started two community funded projects.

1st is a 3 BTC fund to get listed on Bittrex with marketing support:
http://www.mue.club/post/get-mue-listed-on-bittrex-promotional-support-3-btc-fund-7300308?pid=1286233522#post1286233522

2nd is a BTC fund to get at least $500 for listing with CoinPayments.net a crypto payment processor:
http://www.mue.club/post/coinpayments-net-getting-monetaryunit-to-merchants-7300322?pid=1286225218#post1286225218

If this is something you would like to get involved with, we would really appreciate your support.

Thanks

[Mue]

We have a whole section dedicated to to give aways and promotions.
Please check it out.
http://www.mue.club/?forum=421767

[PVmining]

hi mue's
  nice to see more and more action here.

I've patched my daemons and it seems to be working fine on:

Ubuntu Vivid with openssl 1.0.1f-1ubuntu10
Debian Jessie with openssl 1.0.1k-1

I've created a dev branch with these fixes for testing purposes. https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/tree/dev

i have some little problems to compile the new wallet on ubuntu 14.04

main branch error:

Code:

Gui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/bitcoin.o src/qt/bitcoin.cpp
In file included from src/wallet.h:13:0,
                 from src/init.h:8,
                 from src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:13:
src/main.h:51:51: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow]
 static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 1000000000000000 * COIN;
                                                   ^
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:122:5: error: ‘setCodecForTr’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’
     QTextCodec::setCodecForTr(QTextCodec::codecForName("UTF-8"));
     ^
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:123:5: error: ‘setCodecForCStrings’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’
     QTextCodec::setCodecForCStrings(QTextCodec::codecForTr());
     ^
make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Error 1

dev-branch (actual version) error:

Code:

-I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I/usr/include/qt5/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt5/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/qrcodedialog.o src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp
src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp:14:22: fatal error: qrencode.h: No such file or directory
 #include <qrencode.h>
                      ^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [build/qrcodedialog.o] Error 1

any hints on this?
i would like to use the dev branch cause of the openSSL bug, if it is ok for mainnet.

[drakoin]

oops

C-CEX.com exchange news!

We have to free up server resources for new coins by delisting some coins which have consistently low trading volume.
The following coins will be removed on February, 25th if their average trading volume for the last week has not exceeded 0.1 BTC/day:

..., MonetaryUnit [MUE], ...

[Mue]

hi mue's
  nice to see more and more action here.

I've patched my daemons and it seems to be working fine on:

Ubuntu Vivid with openssl 1.0.1f-1ubuntu10
Debian Jessie with openssl 1.0.1k-1

I've created a dev branch with these fixes for testing purposes. https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/tree/dev

i have some little problems to compile the new wallet on ubuntu 14.04

main branch error:

Code:

Gui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/bitcoin.o src/qt/bitcoin.cpp
In file included from src/wallet.h:13:0,
                 from src/init.h:8,
                 from src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:13:
src/main.h:51:51: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow]
 static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 1000000000000000 * COIN;
                                                   ^
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:122:5: error: ‘setCodecForTr’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’
     QTextCodec::setCodecForTr(QTextCodec::codecForName("UTF-8"));
     ^
src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:123:5: error: ‘setCodecForCStrings’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’
     QTextCodec::setCodecForCStrings(QTextCodec::codecForTr());
     ^
make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Error 1

dev-branch (actual version) error:

Code:

-I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I/usr/include/qt5/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt5/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/qrcodedialog.o src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp
src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp:14:22: fatal error: qrencode.h: No such file or directory
 #include <qrencode.h>
                      ^
compilation terminated.
make: *** [build/qrcodedialog.o] Error 1

any hints on this?
i would like to use the dev branch cause of the openSSL bug, if it is ok for mainnet.

I've opened an issue on github
https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/issues/7

[Mue]

oops

C-CEX.com exchange news!

We have to free up server resources for new coins by delisting some coins which have consistently low trading volume.
The following coins will be removed on February, 25th if their average trading volume for the last week has not exceeded 0.1 BTC/day:

..., MonetaryUnit [MUE], ...

We are thinking bigger than C-CEX
http://www.mue.club/?forum=422436