cinnamon_carter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
|
February 11, 2015, 07:13:29 AM |
|
no disrespect to anyone's work intended, I am not commenting on the virus total of any wallets--- other than the one I compiled had a virus total one which was the good old ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe , same link as was posted a few pages prior on thread https://github.com/cinnamoncoin/MUE-Src/releasesHey dev.......just went to update my wallet bud and very concerned with what I am seeing! Running this new wallet through VirusTotal, I am getting 31 infections!! Been around this game for a while bud and am quite used to false positives but there is NO way I can use a wallet with that many coming up and they are not all related to the miner in the wallet. This number is INSANE compare to anything I have seen in crypto, I simply cannot use this wallet man.....this is just crazy!
Can we get a wallet without the built in miner or something so we can KNOW we have a clean wallet?
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2015, 09:35:20 AM Last edit: February 11, 2015, 11:12:49 AM by Mue |
|
I'm sure no one will think there is any disrespect Thanks for your input and support cinnamon_carter, it's appreciated. It's pretty clear the minerd software and the additional dlls associated with that, cause virustotal to have a bit of a meltdown, and as you indicate, without those, virus total is just a single hit; "Have a look at this (without the mining software), only 1/56 on virus total https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/4bb81af5a18f44b02d177fe2c0bc065fe660e2d54a5849a1940b1f0fabbb2185/analysis/download link https://mega.co.nz/#!TFUz1BZD!kt4Y61HBYCsFIHEmFNebvIRBiXuhWCPPDbHsdqAg0yA" It's always good to be vigilant, and if the source can be "trusted" then it is good to keep in mind that if mining software is combined with the wallet software flags will be waved by virustotal. Mining software like minerd is essentially password cracking software, trying to "guess" the next hash, so it's no surprise really. In fact, I can't even download most wallets in Chrome now, not just the MUE wallet as Chrome thinks most of them are malicious..sigh... Thanks again for your input, it is appreciated no disrespect to anyone's work intended, I am not commenting on the virus total of any wallets--- other than the one I compiled had a virus total one which was the good old ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.BJ potentially unsafe , same link as was posted a few pages prior on thread https://github.com/cinnamoncoin/MUE-Src/releasesHey dev.......just went to update my wallet bud and very concerned with what I am seeing! Running this new wallet through VirusTotal, I am getting 31 infections!! Been around this game for a while bud and am quite used to false positives but there is NO way I can use a wallet with that many coming up and they are not all related to the miner in the wallet. This number is INSANE compare to anything I have seen in crypto, I simply cannot use this wallet man.....this is just crazy!
Can we get a wallet without the built in miner or something so we can KNOW we have a clean wallet?
|
|
|
|
drakoin
|
|
February 11, 2015, 01:28:14 PM |
|
Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was. I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE. This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE. With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...
I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0 "sendmany.sh"
|
no sign of a signature
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2015, 11:08:27 PM |
|
Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was. I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE. This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE. With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...
I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0 "sendmany.sh" Thank you, will do just that
|
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 11, 2015, 11:11:51 PM |
|
Here's a pre-release I've been working on. It includes a few bug fixes and Coin Control for moving small amounts into one address, among other things. For your convenience, I have also uploaded a windows binary of uncle-bobs minerd in a separate zip. https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/releases/tag/1.0.0.0-b20e016I marked it as pre-release because it hasn't been extensively tested. Testing going really well. Coin control is working great....would be very nice if there was a "wallet defrag" button that automatically did the coin control stuff...just sayin Testing the 3 different minerd versions, I found a 30% performance increase using the "minerd-avx" version as compared to the old minerd version. That's a pretty good performance boost by anyones standards.
|
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 12, 2015, 02:42:46 PM |
|
A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mineDear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine. Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway. My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by; - Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
- Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
- Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)
Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042and we see where the project goes? Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome
|
|
|
|
drakoin
|
|
February 13, 2015, 06:49:16 PM Last edit: February 13, 2015, 08:01:33 PM by drakoin |
|
Coin control is actually ALOT easier than I thought it was. I had a test wallet with a balance of about 2000 MUE. This was made of about 2000 inputs of small transactions which meant when it came to sending MUE from this wallet I kept getting the "transaction creation error" message whenever I tried to send over a few hundred MUE. With this pre-release wallet with Coin Control, I spent about 5 minutes sending 100 MUE at a time ...
I once ran into the same problem, and solved it with a script. Have a look: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.0 "sendmany.sh" Thank you, will do just that I have actually added MUE to the examples (and donation address *g*) in my script now, and migrated the script from bitcointalk into my github: https://github.com/drakoin/LinuxWallet/blob/master/sendmany.shExplanations are still in that thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167By the way, my script works with any linux wallet of ANY currency that supports the 'sendtoaddress' and 'getbalance' RPC API calls! VERY useful for bundling up small transactions that come from mining.
|
no sign of a signature
|
|
|
theboccet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:12:43 AM |
|
Hello MUE community!!! We are announcing the DRAW of this week!! please check our blockolotto.com for more details Or our twitter account twitter.com/BlockOLottOPlease refer to our blockolotto thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=871903.new#newgood luck miners!! thank you for supporting us.
|
|
|
|
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦______ ¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¯¯¯¯¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
| | |
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ | MONETARYUNIT .......for Me, U & Everyone....... |
[/
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 15, 2015, 10:48:16 AM |
|
A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mineDear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine. Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway. My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by; - Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
- Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
- Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)
Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042and we see where the project goes? Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability?
|
|
|
|
|
theboccet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 15, 2015, 03:01:35 PM |
|
CONGRATULATIONS We announced the winner of the DRAW 6 He won a great amount of 100.000MUE please check our www.blockolotto.com for more details Or our twitter account https://twitter.com/BlockOLottOThank you for participating and supporting MonetaryUnit Coin. thank you MUE community.
|
|
|
|
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦______ ¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¯¯¯¯¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
| | |
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ | MONETARYUNIT .......for Me, U & Everyone....... |
[/
|
|
|
theboccet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 15, 2015, 03:10:09 PM |
|
A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mineDear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine. Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway. My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by; - Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
- Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
- Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)
Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042and we see where the project goes? Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability? personally i have a preference for the burning but i have another suggestion about MUE coin. I never seen a quark based coin with POS.Is there a possibility to have this on quark algo?If yes it will be a huge update for MUE to have burned coins and POS with coins control option. what about this MUE?!!!!
|
|
|
|
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦______ ¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¯¯¯¯¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
| | |
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯ ¦¦¦¦¦¯
| | | ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¯¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦_¦_¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ | MONETARYUNIT .......for Me, U & Everyone....... |
[/
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 16, 2015, 09:41:36 AM |
|
A serious question about the remaining 21 million MUE pre-mineDear all, I just wanted to get any opinion or feedback regarding the balance of the MUE pre-mine. Nearly 50% has already been distributed to faucets, promotions, giveaways, development, services, crypto scratch cards (launching any day) etc etc I have been diligent and honest in maintaining my integrity with it's use, and not 1 has been used for personal gain in anyway. My intentions for the remainder of the pre-mine was to continue to attempt to increase promotion, exposure, popularity & adoption of MUE by; - Increase the amount of MUE for new Twitter followers and FaceBooks likes (1000 MUE each rather than 300).
- Continue to fund the www.BlockOlottO.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the www.MinersLottery.com giveaways
- Continue to fund the planned www.GetCoinReward.com proof of action campaign site
- Fund more Crypto Scratch cards (currently 2.1 Million has been allocated to them, I wanted to increase this to 10 Million)
Or do I burn the remainder, see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831042and we see where the project goes? Any and all comments, feedback & suggestions welcome Either no one has a strong opinion on this either way, or you all have just total faith in my decision making ability? personally i have a preference for the burning but i have another suggestion about MUE coin. I never seen a quark based coin with POS.Is there a possibility to have this on quark algo?If yes it will be a huge update for MUE to have burned coins and POS with coins control option. what about this MUE?!!!! Thanks for the feedback, I'll wait a little more time to see if any further opinion is given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
February 19, 2015, 02:33:56 PM |
|
hi mue's nice to see more and more action here. I've patched my daemons and it seems to be working fine on: Ubuntu Vivid with openssl 1.0.1f-1ubuntu10 Debian Jessie with openssl 1.0.1k-1 I've created a dev branch with these fixes for testing purposes. https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/tree/devi have some little problems to compile the new wallet on ubuntu 14.04 main branch error: Gui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/bitcoin.o src/qt/bitcoin.cpp In file included from src/wallet.h:13:0, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:13: src/main.h:51:51: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow] static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 1000000000000000 * COIN; ^ src/qt/bitcoin.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:122:5: error: ‘setCodecForTr’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’ QTextCodec::setCodecForTr(QTextCodec::codecForName("UTF-8")); ^ src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:123:5: error: ‘setCodecForCStrings’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’ QTextCodec::setCodecForCStrings(QTextCodec::codecForTr()); ^ make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Error 1
dev-branch (actual version) error: -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I/usr/include/qt5/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt5/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/qrcodedialog.o src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp:14:22: fatal error: qrencode.h: No such file or directory #include <qrencode.h> ^ compilation terminated. make: *** [build/qrcodedialog.o] Error 1 any hints on this? i would like to use the dev branch cause of the openSSL bug, if it is ok for mainnet.
|
|
|
|
drakoin
|
|
February 19, 2015, 04:48:51 PM |
|
oops C-CEX.com exchange news!
We have to free up server resources for new coins by delisting some coins which have consistently low trading volume. The following coins will be removed on February, 25th if their average trading volume for the last week has not exceeded 0.1 BTC/day:
..., MonetaryUnit [MUE], ...
|
no sign of a signature
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 19, 2015, 07:26:11 PM |
|
hi mue's nice to see more and more action here. I've patched my daemons and it seems to be working fine on: Ubuntu Vivid with openssl 1.0.1f-1ubuntu10 Debian Jessie with openssl 1.0.1k-1 I've created a dev branch with these fixes for testing purposes. https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/tree/devi have some little problems to compile the new wallet on ubuntu 14.04 main branch error: Gui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/bitcoin.o src/qt/bitcoin.cpp In file included from src/wallet.h:13:0, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:13: src/main.h:51:51: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow] static const int64 MAX_MONEY = 1000000000000000 * COIN; ^ src/qt/bitcoin.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:122:5: error: ‘setCodecForTr’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’ QTextCodec::setCodecForTr(QTextCodec::codecForName("UTF-8")); ^ src/qt/bitcoin.cpp:123:5: error: ‘setCodecForCStrings’ is not a member of ‘QTextCodec’ QTextCodec::setCodecForCStrings(QTextCodec::codecForTr()); ^ make: *** [build/bitcoin.o] Error 1
dev-branch (actual version) error: -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidgets -I/usr/include/qt5/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt5/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -o build/qrcodedialog.o src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp src/qt/qrcodedialog.cpp:14:22: fatal error: qrencode.h: No such file or directory #include <qrencode.h> ^ compilation terminated. make: *** [build/qrcodedialog.o] Error 1 any hints on this? i would like to use the dev branch cause of the openSSL bug, if it is ok for mainnet. I've opened an issue on github https://github.com/MonetaryUnit/MUE-Src/issues/7
|
|
|
|
Mue (OP)
|
|
February 19, 2015, 07:27:07 PM |
|
oops C-CEX.com exchange news!
We have to free up server resources for new coins by delisting some coins which have consistently low trading volume. The following coins will be removed on February, 25th if their average trading volume for the last week has not exceeded 0.1 BTC/day:
..., MonetaryUnit [MUE], ... We are thinking bigger than C-CEX http://www.mue.club/?forum=422436
|
|
|
|
|