[ANN][CRAIG] CraigsCoin | CLASSIFIED ADS ON BLOCKCHAIN 5+ POD BITTREX, CRYPTSY

[Jookly]

so we are done pretending that the russian "holidays" last two months?

[Fritz93]

It doesn't look like Pavel is coming back.

never trust russians *no offence babes*

[LovSan]

It doesn't look like Pavel is coming back.

never trust russians *no offence babes*

It sounds like in all last year altcoin scams were involved only Russians. Never trust people up to day until they prove otherwise and even after that keep in mind, that humans are scammy creatures, act accordingly - thats the point.

[rustynailer]

Where are you Pavel?

You scamming piece of shit, have you been enjoying spending other peoples hard earned. 

[natmccoy]

CHILLLL OUT. Damn, the coin is functional, it has remained on bittrex, it's at 100 satoshi and my wallet is happily staking away, Pavel was here recently and said there will likely be website progress around the end of the month.

We need people to post ads though. There hasn't been a new ad in 6 weeks.

Edit: Somebody just posted an ad for a Cambodian restaurant, awesome!

Edit2: $130 of volume, lots of buys. Could be our hero who arrives every time the de-list warning appears.

[3r197]

CHILLLL OUT. Damn, the coin is functional, it has remained on bittrex, it's at 100 satoshi and my wallet is happily staking away, Pavel was here recently and said there will likely be website progress around the end of the month.

We need people to post ads though. There hasn't been a new ad in 6 weeks.

Edit: Somebody just posted an ad for a Cambodian restaurant, awesome!

Edit2: $130 of volume, lots of buys. Could be our hero who arrives every time the de-list warning appears.

That's great! To see it so early in the de-list warning stage, makes me think it's actually a legit investor rather than someone buying and selling to himself

[fartbags]

This is a big idea and will take a long time to build.

It would be nice to see some screen capture videos of what is going on though.

[PTseller]

It would be nice to see some screen capture videos of what is going on though.

That will be good and price will increase for sure. Dev should post screenshot or video of the development !

[natmccoy]

That's great! To see it so early in the de-list warning stage, makes me think it's actually a legit investor rather than someone buying and selling to himself

They bought into large sell walls at 99 & 100 satoshi that had been there for a few days at least, so I think you're right.

I'm only about the 12th largest holder right now, I wonder who the 10 guys at the top are. The #1 wallet is Bittrex, does anyone know where the Cryptsy wallet is listed? If Cryptsy isn't #2 then someone out there is holding 10% of the coins, or about $700 worth.

[natmccoy]

Why is my wallet's weight larger than the network weight? 

[sdersdf3]

natmccoy and 3r197 - it's kind of amusing to read you guys go on discussing staking and late buys like this is still a viable coin.

[natmccoy]

Actually, is it not interesting that none of the top 10 holders have stood up and announced themselves in this thread? Are they all Russian?

It appears that the richest wallet (excluding bittrex at the real #1 spot) has been staking. They acquired 185,000 coins during the ICO, then accumulated the other 2.8 million later. They have not staked since 9 days ago.

The 2nd richest wallet bought 2 million coins 1 month after the ICO. It too stopped staking 9 days ago.

The 3rd richest wallet also bought 2 million coins after the ICO. It too stopped staking 9 days ago.

The 4th richest wallet has never staked, yet just added 1.75 million coins 10 days ago.

The ten richest personal wallets contain 42% of the coins.

11% of the coins are for sale on Bittrex but all above 100 satoshi.

To me this sounds like a coin that most holders are not willing to part with for a low price. It's also a coin that those interested refuse to allow to be de-listed.

Now what is going on here? Are the same few people that relentlessly try to destroy hope in this thread, also those that hold the most coins?

Is it a group of Russian folks? Random altcoin gamblers that would rather hold for years than sell at a loss? Pavel &/or his coders re-investing into the coin while intentionally not interacting with the community?

Honestly that would probably be the most lucrative move as an ICO recipient if you knew you had a badass website on the way.... use 5% of the ICO funds to buy 50% of the coins then release the real project. Yet that's probably one of the least likely scenarios.


P.S: Seriously, where is the cryptsy wallet on the blockexperts richlist?

[Splatters]

I always see activity on this coin, but wil it never go back to 1444? I think nope!

[Fritz93]

Actually, is it not interesting that none of the top 10 holders have stood up and announced themselves in this thread? Are they all Russian?

It appears that the richest wallet (excluding bittrex at the real #1 spot) has been staking. They acquired 185,000 coins during the ICO, then accumulated the other 2.8 million later. They have not staked since 9 days ago.

The 2nd richest wallet bought 2 million coins 1 month after the ICO. It too stopped staking 9 days ago.

The 3rd richest wallet also bought 2 million coins after the ICO. It too stopped staking 9 days ago.

The 4th richest wallet has never staked, yet just added 1.75 million coins 10 days ago.

The ten richest personal wallets contain 42% of the coins.

11% of the coins are for sale on Bittrex but all above 100 satoshi.

To me this sounds like a coin that most holders are not willing to part with for a low price. It's also a coin that those interested refuse to allow to be de-listed.

Now what is going on here? Are the same few people that relentlessly try to destroy hope in this thread, also those that hold the most coins?

Is it a group of Russian folks? Random altcoin gamblers that would rather hold for years than sell at a loss? Pavel &/or his coders re-investing into the coin while intentionally not interacting with the community?

Honestly that would probably be the most lucrative move as an ICO recipient if you knew you had a badass website on the way.... use 5% of the ICO funds to buy 50% of the coins then release the real project. Yet that's probably one of the least likely scenarios.


P.S: Seriously, where is the cryptsy wallet on the blockexperts richlist?

WERY INTEREDASTING

[3r197]

Why is my wallet's weight larger than the network weight?  

Welcome to my world. I wish I knew why that is even possible. Cause as far as I can tell you don't get any interest off the coin weight that is above the network weight.
I only get about 1/2% of stake, not 2%. Sometimes I wonder if it has to do with the way the coins split up as they mature - wonder if there was a way to lock the amount of times they split. There has to be a bottom, right? Or the next thing you'll have is an amount of .00000001 coins staking on a block - there would be no way for all the coins to stake in a timely manner as there wouldn't be enough time for such miniscule amounts to cycle through, even if you had just a couple thousand coins.



Anyways, I fixed it for ya. I started staking again. Your weight should be back in line now getting your 2%

Cheers!

[Vlad2Vlad]

Why would someone with millions of CraigsCoins purposely stop staking 9 days ago?

What's the point of that?

Thanks!

[WEBcreator]

Why would someone with millions of CraigsCoins purposely stop staking 9 days ago?

What's the point of that?

Thanks!

because they lose hope and started to get into other coins
or because their connection got unplugged 

[3r197]

Why would someone with millions of CraigsCoins purposely stop staking 9 days ago?

What's the point of that?

Thanks!

Like I said in my previous post. Imagine how high the wallet weight would be over the network weight. That's a lot of coins that don't earn any interest.
Pretty disheartening.

[natmccoy]

Like I said in my previous post. Imagine how high the wallet weight would be over the network weight. That's a lot of coins that don't earn any interest.
Pretty disheartening.

Ahhhh I seee! That makes sense why they might stop, but I don't understand why it happens.

The 5th largest wallet is staking (993,000 coins) and the network weight is back up to 300,000.

[3r197]

Like I said in my previous post. Imagine how high the wallet weight would be over the network weight. That's a lot of coins that don't earn any interest.
Pretty disheartening.

Ahhhh I seee! That makes sense why they might stop, but I don't understand why it happens.

The 5th largest wallet is staking (993,000 coins) and the network weight is back up to 300,000.

I don't know why it happens either. And remember, when you say wallet, I'm guessing you mean address, right? Some block chain explorer programs have a "largest wallet" tab. Where you can see a wallets first address and all addresses created after and combining to total coins associated with them. If that indicator was on the Craigs Coin block explorer, we'd be able to piece the puzzle together a little bit better in terms of possible exchange wallets and big bag holders.

Are you getting your 2% interest??
Total coins multiplied by .02 (you could add a compound interest amount to that %) and divided by 365 days = number of coins you should stake per day.