|
EntryPoint
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:22:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Winky
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:25:50 PM |
|
Bitmarkdark(BTMD)™ More info coming soon™. no yes
|
|
|
|
xibeijan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:27:07 PM |
|
L
exactly
|
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:32:25 PM |
|
pls noooo
isnt there any other coins of u dev where u can work on?
|
|
|
|
burningzoul
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:55:15 PM |
|
MAD PAINT SKILLS BRO!
|
|
|
|
defcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2014, 03:58:16 PM |
|
Just when you thought crypto could not get any worse...
|
|
|
|
KenR
|
|
October 02, 2014, 04:11:36 PM |
|
"Dark" again
|
| | | ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ | | | | | | ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ | | | .WEBSITE. ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ .ANN THREAD. | | | | | | . ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | | | ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ █ ████ | | | |
|
|
|
|
Burninj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 02, 2014, 04:18:47 PM |
|
What about a bitcoindarkdark?
|
|
|
|
coinsolidation
|
|
October 02, 2014, 04:41:45 PM |
|
1. no affiliation 2. use pfennig 3. don't be useless 4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with 5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point. 6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling. 7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web. Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
|
|
October 02, 2014, 05:11:12 PM |
|
Are you going to have KlaranetDark too?
|
|
|
|
82ndabnmedic
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:14:47 PM |
|
This Must be a joke...I won't even waste my time ranting about this!
|
CISSP | PMP | CEH
Bitmark: Project Manager & PR Coordinator
BTC: 1FEi8MSP3ccoqLah8EcxfGZVHUViEmQfvQ
BTM: bNidDXnRu5fuD8Th7cPFh7jnPdyAhMh7Nr
|
|
|
Mr.Silver
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:21:47 PM |
|
bad name, better is bitlitdogvertdarklightcoin™ Use my advice
|
|
|
|
neleonele
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:26:42 PM |
|
No way!
This is scam
|
|
|
|
hardroad
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
█ If you want logo pm me █
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:29:14 PM |
|
Bitmarkdark(BTMD)™ More info coming soon™. no yes why?
|
|
|
|
dezoel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1081
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
October 02, 2014, 06:36:12 PM |
|
Bitmarkdark? I think yes...
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
dbkeys
|
|
October 09, 2014, 01:30:46 PM |
|
1. no affiliation 2. use pfennig 3. don't be useless 4. dark wallet is likely better than anything you can come up with 5. if you think "bitmark" has anything to do with bitmark gaining traction, you're missing the point. 6. I'd like to confirm that markings are anonymous, pseudonymous, or identified giving complete choice to the users of the system anyway. So "Anonymous Marking" is limiting rather than enabling. 7. Further, hopefully you know that marking is a new unreleased protocol, any changes to a daemon do not affect marking which resides at a layer above, on the web. Good luck Is there a primer on Marking ? What are its origins, what are the main problems it aims to resolve, or the benefits it wants to bring, and in particular how is it implemented and begin used by bitmark. Thanks in advance !
|
DNS Seeder / Node Trackers
|
|
|
|