CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)

0.05btc

900mhash 1070
1650.mhash 1080ti

[1715461285]

1715461285

[1715461285]

1715461285

[1715461285]

1715461285

[rednoW]

Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)

0.05btc

900mhash 1070
1650.mhash 1080ti

don't forget nist5 and bulwark )))

[wacko]

Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)

1650.mhash 1080ti

As always you "forget" to mention that it's "overclocked like there's no tomorrow" 1080 ti.  And an average undervolted 1080 ti is more like 1450-1500 MH/s.

[Kompik]

Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)

1650.mhash 1080ti

As always you "forget" to mention that it's "overclocked like there's no tomorrow" 1080 ti.  And an average undervolted 1080 ti is more like 1450-1500 MH/s.

Yeah the 1080tis have a problem with cooling in such a state

[Schleicher]

Hi. Appreciate if u can help me as i was trying to bring my 1070 neoscrypt to ~1100 (what i read).
i started with ccminer tpruvot latest version on win X64. i got ~850 Kh/S.
i now downloaded ccMiner release 8.15(KlausT-mod) and while running i get error "Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init_2stream' at line 1432: Out of memory".
It may be i'm doing begginer's mistakes (i'm quite sure) but i'll really appreciate help.. (what should i do get my 1070 to ~1100 Kh/s neoscripts).

Reduce the intensity. -i 17.5 or something like that should work.

[candyiman]

The alexis miner is doing 450 KHASH on the 1070ti, so you need a dev to change the code to do the expected 1100-1400 Khash. I am reaching 1300+ on the gtx 1070 with my cuda 9.0 mod and only 550 on the 1070ti.
$750 dollars is nothing. Devs need money too.

1360 with klausT on 1070 Ti, not extreme clocks, locked at 912 mV as one of the cards struggled on 900, 1898 Mhz (if you lower the clock you can probably do more with mem, but I'm on autoswitch with Lyra2rev2 and it needs high core and doesn't need mem, so I chose the middle road). Alexis does just a bit less, not sure why is that yours doesn't do it.

And yes, 0.05 BTC was OK-ish before, now it's $750 and profitability changes in a day or two so you might never get to profit as much from the difference. Profitability in BTC dropped as a whole. The 5 minute dev-fee kills auto-switching profitability, but it's in the Bitcore mod I paid for, and I never agreed to have this in my miner.

I believe nvidia inspector has this option.

One of the versions. Google helps

Alexis does just a bit less, not sure why is that yours doesn't do it.

this is how you sell mods

[bensam1231]

The problem is there's probably 50+% of nvidia users out there that mine in P2 mode and just don't know how to force the miner to P0. So +400 will only be something like "+200 from stock" for a lot of folks.

That's basically a OC. Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.

Of cause you don't know. One of the reasons you are doing 2.5$ with 1070  

You are an absolute dumbass. I've known about the p0 state and one of the original people who reported it when mining with 970s. It was either in this thread or Epsylons.

Without a load on the GPU it shouldn't cause a crash. If you're getting crashes from +200 without a load you're already unstable.

I've no idea what exactly happens when that +200 jump occurs, maybe there is some kind of load in that moment. Maybe some calculations are still being done when the miner is closing (if there was no load at that moment, why would it go to p0 after all and not to some low-power mode?). I've had very stable rigs hashing for 24+ hours but crashing when the miner is closed (and then, after forcing cuda apps to run in p0 on those systems, they're stable at those clocks for days/weeks). I've seen quite a few similar reports from other users, afaik it's a relatively common issue.

There isn't. It goes p0 because the load is removed before the clocks go into low power state.

Forgive me, but I'm not going to believe your absolute stability on all your rigs for weeks/months/years, just like adf earning $720 per day mining with a 1070. I have enough rigs to figure out it's not worth the time or the effort of forcing p0, if you're crashing on +200 on exit you're not stable to begin with or you have an extreme outlier. It's neither capable of going +200 without crashing without a load and still somehow capable of tolerating higher clocks to begin with.

lol this isn't open for debate, although cute that you think it is, you have to defend your third world brethren. The average person earn $10 per year in your country, if you earn $100 per year, you're earning 10x what they're earning, that would be considered 'rich' by comparison to people in their country. Same as if you earned $200,000 in the US compared to $20,000 per year you'd be considered pretty rich (although that depends on where you live in the US).

The whole 'rich' term is subjective. There is no baseline for 'rich'. You can live in Uganda and say you're rich because you're earning 100x the average citizens income, but that's still peanuts depending on where else you're living in the world.

And again,.... You have no idea what You are talking about. Prices for expensive and luxury things here are HIGHER than in the countries with higher GDP.

LOL... And 'rich' which is a completely subjective term relates to how much money you have and make compared to your average money making countryman, not what you buy with it. You could buy 20 stocks of celery instead of barely being able to afford one and not be starving, depending on where you live that's 'rich' you silly goose. When you compare your buying power on a global scale you're no longer talking about being rich anymore and it was one of my original points. 'Rich' depends on where you live compared to the GDP per capita, which is why someone can claim to be rich, but isn't remotely rich when compared to the rest of the world.

Also I hear you can get things shipped pretty much anywhere. 'shipping is so expensive', look into a relay service. Solving basic problems for the affluent, you're welcome.

Also even if you live in a first world country, buying things like electronics for instance can be 'more expensive' then other countries simply due to demand, taxes, and where they're shipped. For instance buying GPUs in the US vs Germany or France or really anywhere in Euroland.

No he is right. Forcing P0 is important for memory intensive algos, you will never get high OC stable unless you force it. I dont know what +500 is, but every 1070 card brand and type of memory runs easily on 4400 MHZ, the better ones, samsung especially can go over 4500 being stable all the time.

You already know what +500 is based on your own knowledge. If you aren't forcing p0 you would be p2 and 200 lower then p0. That would be 4500. Weird we're at the same memory speed only I don't need to use p0.

If you mine Ethereum look into low intensity dag generation, I'm the person who got Claymore to add it to his miner. Maybe after playing around with it for a bit you'll figure out why.

[thin]

Smartcash sp-mod is very profitable right now.. (keccak)

0.05btc

900mhash 1070
1650.mhash 1080ti

yes, maybe it will be profitable few hours per week.

[abudfv2008]

1) I've known about the p0 state and one of the original people who reported it when mining with 970s. It was either in this thread or Epsylons.

2) Forgive me, but I'm not going to believe your absolute stability on all your rigs for weeks/months/years, just like adf earning $720 per day mining with a 1070. I have enough rigs to figure out it's not worth the time or the effort of forcing p0.

3) You already know what +500 is based on your own knowledge. If you aren't forcing p0 you would be p2 and 200 lower then p0. That would be 4500. Weird we're at the same memory speed only I don't need to use p0.

1) I thought it is impossible, but if you know about p0 and don't use it than you are more retarded than I thought before.
2) Of cause you dont believe. You believe only in 2.5$ - cause you can't even imagine more.
3) You say that you have rigs but you don't know that different GPUs has different clocks as default? Oh yes - you won't believe that - it's impossible just because you think so.

[dominuspro]

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

[Dr_Victor]

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?
I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods

I am not selling anything I just tried the 1070ti on different exe files and they all do around 500, but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. Where can I find the miner that does 1700? I am using cuda 9.0 and the latest driver.

here you are! you can see two gtx1070ti are working on 1360kh/s


and on gtx 1080ti are doing about 1670 kh/s. can you make really better then that?

Tell us gtx 1080ti settings to get 1670, please.

[garytheasshole]

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?
I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods

I am not selling anything I just tried the 1070ti on different exe files and they all do around 500, but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. Where can I find the miner that does 1700? I am using cuda 9.0 and the latest driver.

here you are! you can see two gtx1070ti are working on 1360kh/s


and on gtx 1080ti are doing about 1670 kh/s. can you make really better then that?

Tell us gtx 1080ti settings to get 1670, please.

sp doesn't have a 1080ti, too poor, nobody support his work, please "donate"

[zijieli]

It's profitable to use spmod on a large farm, and it's hard for an individual user to recover the cost

[bensam1231]

1) I've known about the p0 state and one of the original people who reported it when mining with 970s. It was either in this thread or Epsylons.

2) Forgive me, but I'm not going to believe your absolute stability on all your rigs for weeks/months/years, just like adf earning $720 per day mining with a 1070. I have enough rigs to figure out it's not worth the time or the effort of forcing p0.

3) You already know what +500 is based on your own knowledge. If you aren't forcing p0 you would be p2 and 200 lower then p0. That would be 4500. Weird we're at the same memory speed only I don't need to use p0.

1) I thought it is impossible, but if you know about p0 and don't use it than you are more retarded than I thought before.
2) Of cause you dont believe. You believe only in 2.5$ - cause you can't even imagine more.
3) You say that you have rigs but you don't know that different GPUs has different clocks as default? Oh yes - you won't believe that - it's impossible just because you think so.

You really are a dumbass. I explain my resonsings and rational for not using it and you can't even look at points for using it. Notice how you didn't even resply until all the points were discussed already and you never even replied to points, which is pretty hilarious because you seem to enjoy making bulleted lists about points?

Yes, when I talked about profits over the course of a month two weeks ago, I was talking about profit today or over the course of this month into the future, especially when Nicehash is down. Bravo, you sir are like exceeding all expectations of being dumb, it's no wonder you can't add up how much you make and look at peak numbers as 'how much you earn'. Even other people in this thread pointed out your numbers are wrong.

What does that even mean? I think you're trying to talk about p0 once again, but completely lost what I was talking about in translation.

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

Yup, a OC makes a pretty big difference. At least now people are talking about their OC settings now when actively comparing miners. This has happened before in exactly this thread. SP talks about his new miner, someone else says 'well I get that too!' meanwhile they're talking about a bleeding edge OC that almost no one can reach and crashes every 15 minutes.

That's the reason you compare things on base stock settings, everyone and anyone can OC and it almost always increases your hashrate, unless you're talking about something weird like scrypt that no one mines anymore on GPUs.

[Kompik]

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

Than you are lucky, on my rigs intensities over 17 always say out of memory

Also high consumption you mean like 175W+?
It would be good to state your model.

[Moondoggie]

It's profitable to use spmod on a large farm, and it's hard for an individual user to recover the cost

Just keep buying cards until you’re large enough then

[cashen]

SP

I can't DL any of the files from GMAIL anymore.

[Ranger4R]

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

it is funny, but how you managed to accept KalusT miner this ->> 17.6 <<-- intensity??
I'm trying to put in but it does not accept  it! only values like 14 15 16 17 kicks in!
what I'm doing wrong here?

[shubaduba]

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

it is funny, but how you managed to accept KalusT miner this ->> 17.6 <<-- intensity??
I'm trying to put in but it does not accept  it! only values like 14 15 16 17 kicks in!
what I'm doing wrong here?

I confirm that KlausT 8.15 x64 can be launched at -i 17.6. It uses 6.9GB out of 8GB GPU's mem.
GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 1305.24kH/s @ 100%TDP / +90 core / + 400 mem.
But alexis 1.0 7.5 is still faster at -i 16.5 (6.4 GB out of 8BG)
GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 1333.66kH/s @ 100%TDP / +90 core / + 400 mem.

[miner32342]

I can confirm 1070 doing over 1300kH neoscrypt if You don't mind high power consumption.
Just use klaust miner and intensity -i 17.6
My clocks are around 2000Mhz gpu and 4500Mhz vram.

it is funny, but how you managed to accept KalusT miner this ->> 17.6 <<-- intensity??
I'm trying to put in but it does not accept  it! only values like 14 15 16 17 kicks in!
what I'm doing wrong here?

I confirm that KlausT 8.15 x64 can be launched at -i 17.6. It uses 6.9GB out of 8GB GPU's mem.
GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 1305.24kH/s @ 100%TDP / +90 core / + 400 mem.
But alexis 1.0 7.5 is still faster at -i 16.5 (6.4 GB out of 8BG)
GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 1333.66kH/s @ 100%TDP / +90 core / + 400 mem.

alexis 1.0 7.5 dowland link ?