CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[rednoW]

OK who needs it for 0.05 btc

show the speed of gtx1070ti ))))

[candyiman]

OK who needs it for 0.05 btc

show the speed of gtx1070ti ))))

I dont have a 1070ti


For 1070
Clocks is +90
mem+390

[candyiman]

OK who needs it for 0.05 btc

https://i.imgur.com/ADfByQs.png

So pretty much the same speed as SP only you're a unknown dev and it still isn't worth $750 at 10% faster.

Both parts true


yah 750$ is too much

[sp_]

The alexis miner is doing 450 KHASH on the 1070ti, so you need a dev to change the code to do the expected 1100-1400 Khash. I am reaching 1300+ on the gtx 1070 with my cuda 9.0 mod and only 550 on the 1070ti.
$750 dollars is nothing. Devs need money too.

[rednoW]

The alexis miner is doing 450 KHASH on the 1070ti, so you need a dev to change the code to do the expected 1100-1400 Khash. I am reaching 1300+ on the gtx 1070 with my cuda 9.0 mod and only 550 on the 1070ti.
$750 dollars is nothing. Devs need money too.

neoscrypt on gtx1070 is not very memory bounded and does 1400khs with max os on Samsung mem. So I was expecting 1500-1600khs with gtx1070ti. Real life was a shock ))

[Amph]

The alexis miner is doing 450 KHASH on the 1070ti, so you need a dev to change the code to do the expected 1100-1400 Khash. I am reaching 1300+ on the gtx 1070 with my cuda 9.0 mod and only 550 on the 1070ti.
$750 dollars is nothing. Devs need money too.

any news about bitcore spmod 5?

[sp_]

my first 1080ti will arrive in a few days. Then I expect another week to work on #5

[cpuwar]

my first 1080ti will arrive in a few days. Then I expect another week to work on #5

Congrat. You earn the money!

[candyiman]

The alexis miner is doing 450 KHASH on the 1070ti, so you need a dev to change the code to do the expected 1100-1400 Khash. I am reaching 1300+ on the gtx 1070 with my cuda 9.0 mod and only 550 on the 1070ti.
$750 dollars is nothing. Devs need money too.

the Price must reflect the result  of a miner

I remember you wanted to sell Polytimos miner for 0.2btc?    yeah  TOO Much for nothing

[sp_]

the Price must reflect the result  of a miner

Is someone willing to pay for a neoscrypt that does 1700 on the 1080ti and 1300 on the 1070ti? Thats about 300% faster than the legacy code from alexis.

[candyiman]

the Price must reflect the result  of a miner

Is someone willing to pay for a neoscrypt that does 1700 on the 1080ti and 1300 on the 1070ti? Thats about 300% faster than the legacy code from alexis.

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?



I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods


ps. Rednow is right the 1070ti should go to 1500-1700 

[sp_]

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?
I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods

I am not selling anything I just tried the 1070ti on different exe files and they all do around 500, but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. Where can I find the miner that does 1700? I am using cuda 9.0 and the latest driver.

[candyiman]

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?
I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods

I am not selling anything I just tried the 1070ti on different exe files and they all do around 500, but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. Where can I find the miner that does 1700? I am using cuda 9.0 and the latest driver.

" but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. "

Donate 0.01 btc I send you directions to a free miner tha does 1300-1550 on 1080ti


"Where can I find the miner that does 1700?"   I said 1070ti "SHOULD" go there   I did not said there is a miner available yet

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

you are saying that current  open source miner on   1080ti   does about 550?
I guess with claims  like that its not so hard to sell mods

I am not selling anything I just tried the 1070ti on different exe files and they all do around 500, but perhaps you can point me in the right direction here. Where can I find the miner that does 1700? I am using cuda 9.0 and the latest driver.

Have you tried KlausT ccminer ? I do about 1100-1150 on 1070 with 60% tdp (112W) and good OC and about 1400/1450 on 1070Ti with about the same TDP/OC, don't have any 1080+ though, but i presume it should also yield good result since neoscrypt isn't very memory dependent.

[bensam1231]

GTX 1070 gives 1350 kh/s with free alexis miner. What is the purpose of that picture with slow-hashing thing?

That would be incorrect (maybe with hardcore OCing). Also Alexis isn't the fastest branch for NeoS.


You guys REALLLLLY need to list the clocks you're operating at. +1000 for memory is unrealistic for like 99.9999% of the GPUs. Memory is the same across all GPUs except for some weirdo models, so +400 is the same for everyone. Bench's should be done at stock clocks. OC's increase hashrate for every miner ever made, no one cares about your super unstable clocks you mine with for 15 minutes before your system hardlocks and you don't notice for two hours.

That's why I've mentioned a few different times SP needs to list fastest available pub miner next to his, so you can weed out a clocks difference. Apparently you guys are being dumbasses and listing OC results against stock clock results.

...but i presume it should also yield good result since neoscrypt isn't very memory dependent.

NeoS is EXTREMELY memory dependent. You'll get a little less hashrate with a 1080 then a 1070, a 1080ti will be about 20% faster. As I mentioned multiple times NeoS is one of the algos that GDDR5X does not operate well on.

[wacko]

Memory is the same across all GPUs except for some weirdo models, so +400 is the same for everyone.

The problem is there's probably 50+% of nvidia users out there that mine in P2 mode and just don't know how to force the miner to P0. So +400 will only be something like "+200 from stock" for a lot of folks.

[bensam1231]

The problem is there's probably 50+% of nvidia users out there that mine in P2 mode and just don't know how to force the miner to P0. So +400 will only be something like "+200 from stock" for a lot of folks.

That's basically a OC. Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.

[wacko]

Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.

Because there's a bug (or is that a feature?) in nvidia drivers or mining software that makes the memory clock jump ~ 200 MHz up when you close the miner's window. I didn't spend too much time investigating it, so maybe it's not all driver versions and/or not all miners that do that, but every single one I tried behaved that way. Let's say you've got gtx 1080 and your stock memory clock is supposed to be 5000. When you set OC to +400 (in MSI AB, for example), and run the miner, your actual memclock will be ~ 5200 or smth like that, and not 5400 (because cuda apps run in p2 instead of p0). Which would be ok, you could just add +600 instead to reach the clock you wanted (5400)... except when you close the miner, the memclock will jump to 5600 for a brief moment. And that is a problem - if you're pushing you memory overclock close to its max, then you'll get the driver crash in that short moment when the clock jumps to +200 more.

If you force cuda apps to run in p0 mode, then that jump is gone, the memory clock stays at whatever you set it to even when you close the miner window. And yeah, it does allow you to OC memory further, because without that weird jump you don't have to leave so much headroom for that brief clock increase and can set higher memclock.

[bensam1231]

Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.

Because there's a bug (or is that a feature?) in nvidia drivers or mining software that makes the memory clock jump ~ 200 MHz up when you close the miner's window. I didn't spend too much time investigating it, so maybe it's not all driver versions and/or not all miners that do that, but every single one I tried behaved that way. Let's say you've got gtx 1080 and your stock memory clock is supposed to be 5000. When you set OC to +400 (in MSI AB, for example), and run the miner, your actual memclock will be ~ 5200 or smth like that, and not 5400 (because cuda apps run in p2 instead of p0). Which would be ok, you could just add +600 instead to reach the clock you wanted (5400)... except when you close the miner, the memclock will jump to 5600 for a brief moment. And that is a problem - if you're pushing you memory overclock close to its max, then you'll get the driver crash in that short moment when the clock jumps to +200 more.

If you force cuda apps to run in p0 mode, then that jump is gone, the memory clock stays at whatever you set it to even when you close the miner window. And yeah, it does allow you to OC memory further, because without that weird jump you don't have to leave so much headroom for that brief clock increase and can set higher memclock.

Without a load on the GPU it shouldn't cause a crash. If you're getting crashes from +200 without a load you're already unstable. For instance you can do +800 on the desktop for pretty much any GPU and it wont crash. I would say +1000, but that's very close to absolute maximum and may crash just by sneezing at it.

+500 for instance is a pretty universally accepted memory OC across all my gpus when mining Ethereum (I haven't OC'd memory while mining Cryptonote or NeoS yet, so that might change). I was running them at p2. They don't crash even though they went +700 upon exiting the miner. However. If I ran +700, almost none of them could run the miner at that, not just when closing the miner.

Maybe you're running super bleeding edge, so I guess, but for all intents and purposes most people aren't going to run into that.

[abudfv2008]

The problem is there's probably 50+% of nvidia users out there that mine in P2 mode and just don't know how to force the miner to P0. So +400 will only be something like "+200 from stock" for a lot of folks.

That's basically a OC. Also not sure why you'd go through the trouble of forcing p0 when you could just OC the memory right out of the gate. Less messing around. Maybe makes your OCD feel better? It doesn't seem to increase voltage to the memory and it doesn't allow you to OC the memory further.

Of cause you don't know. One of the reasons you are doing 2.5$ with 1070