CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[slimslots]

How to use SPMOd 1.5.81 for Skein [ NMS coin ] ?

I load have only 1 file ccminer

#first time of me ^^

thanks you

[sp_]

How to use SPMOd 1.5.81 for Skein [ NMS coin ] ?

usually the bat look like this

ccminer -a skein -o <pool adress > -u <coin adress> -p x

Look in the pool for correct config.

[chup]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

[sp_]

SkeinSPmod2

Pm me

[slimslots]

How to get ?

- SkeinSPmod2
- alexis-hsr


 

[bensam1231]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee

If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.

[chup]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee

If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.

GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?

[bensam1231]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee

If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.

GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?

Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.

[Riptide_NVN]

How much to donate for phi algo spmod?

[chup]

GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?

Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.

Two obvious things:
1. You are hopeless case of person not capable to clean after shitting around.
2. sp_ is going to release sources at the moment some open source foundation realizes that sp_ collected enough money breaking GPL to raise charges against.

[antantti]

Sp_, any plans to release better Tether miner? Daily emission is 100-200 Million USD.

[sp_]

Sp_, any plans to release better Tether miner? Daily emission is 100-200 Million USD.

lol

[salfter]

While trying to get the latest version built on Gentoo, I'm getting these errors:

Code:

quark/cuda_skein512.cu: In function ‘void precalc()’:
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘2147483648u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
   0x08b2b050, 0x9d7c4c27, 0x0ce2a393, 0x88e6e1ea, 0xa52b4335, 0x67a16f49, 0xd732016f, 0x4eeb2e91,
                                                  ^
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘2147483648u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘2684354592u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘4202700544u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘3543279056u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘4142317530u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
quark/cuda_skein512.cu:2712:50: error: narrowing conversion of ‘3003913545u’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside { } [-Wnarrowing]
...

This is on a new build I just set up last night, building against CUDA SDK 9.0.176.  I already have tpruvot-ccminer (on which sp-ccminer is based) built and running. 

I've never written any CUDA code, but it looks like unsigned values are being written into a couple of signed arrays.  I'm trying a build now with this patch:

Code:

--- quark/cuda_skein512.cu~     2017-01-01 12:38:31.000000000 -0800
+++ quark/cuda_skein512.cu      2018-01-20 14:05:06.764299663 -0800
@@ -2704,7 +2704,7 @@
 //     buffer[8] = 0x7000000000000040ull; //t2;
        CUDA_SAFE_CALL(cudaMemcpyToSymbol(precalcvalues, buffer, sizeof(buffer), 0, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice));
 
-       int endingTable[] = {
+       unsigned int endingTable[] = {
                0x80000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000,
                0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000200,
                0x80000000, 0x01400000, 0x00205000, 0x00005088, 0x22000800, 0x22550014, 0x05089742, 0xa0000020,
@@ -2715,7 +2715,7 @@
                0x4f0d0f04, 0x2627484e, 0x310128d2, 0xc668b434, 0x420841cc, 0x62d311b8, 0xe59ba771, 0x85a7a484
        };
 
-       int constantTable[64] = {
+       unsigned int constantTable[64] = {
                0x428a2f98, 0x71374491, 0xb5c0fbcf, 0xe9b5dba5, 0x3956c25b, 0x59f111f1, 0x923f82a4, 0xab1c5ed5,
                0xd807aa98, 0x12835b01, 0x243185be, 0x550c7dc3, 0x72be5d74, 0x80deb1fe, 0x9bdc06a7, 0xc19bf174,
                0xe49b69c1, 0xefbe4786, 0x0fc19dc6, 0x240ca1cc, 0x2de92c6f, 0x4a7484aa, 0x5cb0a9dc, 0x76f988da,

This appeared to build OK, but then it conked out again:

Code:

nvcc -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\" -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\" -I/usr/local/cuda/include -I.  --ptxas-options="-v" -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\" --maxrregcount=80 -o scrypt/salsa_kernel.o -c scrypt/salsa_kernel.cu
nvcc fatal   : Unsupported gpu architecture 'compute_20'

I'd continue, but I'll need to look into this later as I have somewhere to be in a bit.

[bensam1231]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee

If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.

GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?

Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.

Two obvious things:
1. You are hopeless case of person not capable to clean after shitting around.
2. sp_ is going to release sources at the moment some open source foundation realizes that sp_ collected enough money breaking GPL to raise charges against.

Great insult. You should stick to cherry picking a sentence without context from the entirety of paragraphs they're used in as it seems to be the only way you can win a argument. You're like the guy that was in here arguing grammar, punctuation, and spelling as if that makes for any sort of argument outside of an english class.

"Hopless case..." I don't think that means what you think it does. Hue hue. Strawmen are fun. BTW for those of you that are interested in what the kids do to try and win arguments when they don't have the mental capacity to do so they make strawmen. Here is a little tidbit from wiki, trolls online generally do things like this:

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]

This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.

Allegedly, straw man tactics were once known in some parts of the United Kingdom as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

That's neat, you're still a beggar that thinks harping on someone about how they make money will get you free things. And no, they aren't going to sue him. You aren't going to sue him. No one here is going to do anything about this, it's just a bunch of beggars, like yourself, trying to get things for free through guilt.

You give no shits about the GPL beyond how you can make money. If you did you would actually be attempting to help him make his work GPL compliant, like either writing a miner that could take protected modules for speed or funding such a project. No you don't put money where your mouth is? Oh, maybe this isn't just about doing the 'right' thing...

[salfter]

This appeared to build OK, but then it conked out again:

Code:

nvcc -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\" -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\" -I/usr/local/cuda/include -I.  --ptxas-options="-v" -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\" --maxrregcount=80 -o scrypt/salsa_kernel.o -c scrypt/salsa_kernel.cu
nvcc fatal   : Unsupported gpu architecture 'compute_20'

I'd continue, but I'll need to look into this later as I have somewhere to be in a bit.

Took another whack at it just now...fixed Makefile.am to build this with compute_30 instead of compute_20.  It now builds (the fixes I applied are in https://gitlab.com/salfter/portage/tree/master/net-misc/sp-ccminer/files), but a quick run mining with the quark algo conked out after a few minutes with a floating-point exception.  I'm not using excessive optimization...just -O2 -march=native, and the CPU for which it's building is a Celeron G3920.

[chup]

A miner fee still violates the GPL.

If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee

If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.

GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?

Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.

Two obvious things:
1. You are hopeless case of person not capable to clean after shitting around.
2. sp_ is going to release sources at the moment some open source foundation realizes that sp_ collected enough money breaking GPL to raise charges against.

Great insult. You should stick to cherry picking a sentence without context from the entirety of paragraphs they're used in as it seems to be the only way you can win a argument. You're like the guy that was in here arguing grammar, punctuation, and spelling as if that makes for any sort of argument outside of an english class.

"Hopless case..." I don't think that means what you think it does. Hue hue. Strawmen are fun. BTW for those of you that are interested in what the kids do to try and win arguments when they don't have the mental capacity to do so they make strawmen. Here is a little tidbit from wiki, trolls online generally do things like this:

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]

This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.

Allegedly, straw man tactics were once known in some parts of the United Kingdom as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

That's neat, you're still a beggar that thinks harping on someone about how they make money will get you free things. And no, they aren't going to sue him. You aren't going to sue him. No one here is going to do anything about this, it's just a bunch of beggars, like yourself, trying to get things for free through guilt.

You give no shits about the GPL beyond how you can make money. If you did you would actually be attempting to help him make his work GPL compliant, like either writing a miner that could take protected modules for speed or funding such a project. No you don't put money where your mouth is? Oh, maybe this isn't just about doing the 'right' thing...

This is what one gets when asking bensam1231 for one sentence response. Tons of shit around...
Simple as this:
Your claim: "A miner fee still violates the GPL."
My claim: "You're wrong because a miner fee doesn't violate the GPL, but lack of source files".
Keep shitting.

[sp_]

lux sp-mod $16.21 per day on the 1080ti.

used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.

0.05btc

[mycoin2018]

Hi Guys,

Is the LUX mod worth the cost?

Thanks

[Amph]

lux sp-mod $16.21 per day on the 1080ti.

used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.

0.05btc

what is the speed on your lux mod?

[rednoW]

2 Amph

I downloaded some pirated version from russian forum. There was free link. It is working fine and gives 38mhs at 80% tdp (1080ti).
I'm not sure if it is free of viruses as nobody wants to share CRC of original sp mod.