CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[antantti]

Monero nethash before the fork 1200 MHASH, nethash after the fork( block 693)  176 MHASH . the nethash will continue to decline until we reach 720 blocks.


At 176 MHASH we got around  352 000 gpu's mining (@500h/s). This should take some load of ethereum and zcash and boost the profit all over the board.

The 'real' CN total nethash before this latest October pump was somewhere around 0.2-0.3GH. ETN launch added some, nethash almost passed XMR back then. Organic growth.

If I had to guess this will only get worse. Sorry guys.

[bensam1231]

Monero nethash before the fork 1200 MHASH, nethash after the fork( block 693)  176 MHASH . the nethash will continue to decline until we reach 720 blocks.


At 176 MHASH we got around  352 000 gpu's mining (@500h/s). This should take some load of ethereum and zcash and boost the profit all over the board.

Nah, looks like the difficulty is going back up, but it could just be a lump of miners shifting over.

[Amph]

Monero nethash before the fork 1200 MHASH, nethash after the fork( block 693)  176 MHASH . the nethash will continue to decline until we reach 720 blocks.


At 176 MHASH we got around  352 000 gpu's mining (@500h/s). This should take some load of ethereum and zcash and boost the profit all over the board.

is the hashrate the same for the new algo? i mean a 1070ti do the same hash?

[scryptr]

Monero nethash before the fork 1200 MHASH, nethash after the fork( block 693)  176 MHASH . the nethash will continue to decline until we reach 720 blocks.


At 176 MHASH we got around  352 000 gpu's mining (@500h/s). This should take some load of ethereum and zcash and boost the profit all over the board.

is the hashrate the same for the new algo? i mean a 1070ti do the same hash?

HASH RATE IS SIMILAR--

I am getting very similar hash rates and energy usage per hardware device.  However, different software packages perform with vastly different results.   Claymore v11.3 XMR (no fee) outperforms SGminer-GM by nearly 200H/s on my R9 Fury cards (830H/s per Fury now).  I do not modify my BIOS or tune the software extensively, I just run it.  Likewise, CCminer is outperformed by XMR-Stak.  My single-fan 750ti SC cards perform at ~260H/s with XMR-Stak, and at ~200H/s with Epsylon's CCminer v2.2.5.  Epsylon has not yet implemented the new Monero v7 algo, either.  My 1070ti cards get ~650H/s with XMR-Stak with either algo.       --scryptr

EDIT:  Apparently, Epsylon3 has just updated CCminer.  My single-fan 750ti SC cards now hash Monero v7 at ~210H/s.  I need to re-compile XMR-Stak for a more comprehensive comparison.       --scryptr

[Amph]

btw something wrong with spmod 7 bitcore, no result on pool, i'm trying with yiimp, it's not even showing my stats...

it say "pool asked your stats" on the miner...ah nevermind it's the fee

[sp_]

don't use -p stats

[sp_]

Monero nethash before the fork 1200 MHASH, nethash after the fork( block 693)  176 MHASH . the nethash will continue to decline until we reach 720 blocks.


At 176 MHASH we got around  352 000 gpu's mining (@500h/s). This should take some load of ethereum and zcash and boost the profit all over the board.

is the hashrate the same for the new algo? i mean a 1070ti do the same hash?

HASH RATE IS SIMILAR--

I see a loss of 0.8% on my rigs from monerov6 to monerov7 a few hash per card.

[Amph]

even nist5 and x11gost now is asic minable, so we remain with only x16r and x16s and timetravel 10/phi/neos as a big algo, then you have a bunch of minion like poly and modification of wish algo for rubix

[sp_]

From zergpool 11/29 algos can be mined with asics. (38%)

* can be mined with asics
(*) probobly asic miners out there

*scrypt
(*)keccak
*qubit
*quark
neoscrypt
keccakc   
lyra2z
xevan
yescryptR16
x17
*x11
(*)blake2s
x16r
hmq1725
hsr   
bitcore
c11
yescrypt
phi
tribus
lyra2v2
skunk
sib
timetravel
(*)groestl   
*nist5
*x13
*skein
*myr-gr
x16s
            

            
            

[Amph]

From zergpool 11/29 algos can be mined with asics. (38%)

* can be mined with asics
(*) probobly asic miners out there

*scrypt
(*)keccak
*qubit
*quark
neoscrypt
keccakc   
lyra2z
xevan
yescryptR16
x17
*x11
(*)blake2s
x16r
hmq1725
hsr   
bitcore
c11
yescrypt
phi
tribus
lyra2v2
skunk
sib
timetravel
(*)groestl   
*nist5
*x13
*skein
*myr-gr
x16s
            

            
            

they forgot one algo, veltor, which was used by only one coin

[nitrobg]

Source on the nist5 asic?

[stolarzz]

Source on the nist5 asic?

Baikal X10

[konqueror]

Source on the nist5 asic?

https://twitter.com/baikalminer/status/983943280009273345

[Dr_Victor]

As for me existence of ASIC doesn't  stop earning on the same algo. Look at skein, for example. Today DGB-Skein gives on gtx 1080 ti better result than ZEC, ZEN, XZC, BTX, LUX, GBX, BWK and so on.

[coltmerg420]

Happy mining

Hi love your work but i have to ask are you dev pool mod for mining dutch or suprnova ? or just the creator of  of sp-mod ?I need to ask you and ocminer (and any creaters of nvida miners that use cuda ) if i can use more than %10 of my gpu to mine by default pool set  dif i mine i get 20 mh/s they have me at diff 1 max dif 60 if i add p d=1000 -f 300 or d=300 -f 3000 i get 1 th/s speed with no bad shars .last pool stopped me from doing that . The question is if i can get %3000 speed increase and use like 40% of my gpu then y by default cant the miner not see this and give me that speed ?? Pools will keep the dif they think my cards can do .to keep asics in line .The dif is i make $5.00 a day or $600 very big .....i see this i think if all gpu can get the speed they can give all algos will speed up by 3000 % find more blocks and sucks to cap me and all gpu miners at a super low speed is bad ....we all wont altcoins to get big how can we if we are told to mine at %10 power .... .... i have been sending this to dev  since i found the bug on amd zeven algo with sgminer 2 a year ago witch never got corrected this is for all gpu miners including etho and zek algos  the miners and block chains of the algos can get large ..... I now have 40 people that see this and liked the speed i gave them over new years some made $400 a day now they make $2.46 a day same coins same pool ...if they stayed .One or more of you 4 devs have seen me post this and it has did nothing or even looked it it .i have donated $200 to each of you in the past 6 years .and still nothing ......and i know some of you run mining pools and will now know this is.

[sp_]

Dutch coin has a tradevolume of $6 in the last 24 hours. Not worth the effort.

[bensam1231]

And Monero is break even with all the other big coins now. So it lasted, what, all of maybe two days before it got hammered down? At least it's distributing hash now, that's nice.

[sp_]

As for me existence of ASIC doesn't  stop earning on the same algo. Look at skein, for example. Today DGB-Skein gives on gtx 1080 ti better result than ZEC, ZEN, XZC, BTX, LUX, GBX, BWK and so on.

You need fast asiscs to make a difference. Skein is slow, but use less power than the 1080ti

[cryptotamer01]

What is the current fastest x17 miner out there open source or closed source?

Anything faster than alexis ?

[sp_]

The latest unreleased x17-spmod is the fastest. The 2nd fastest is the x17 sp-mod #1 64bit build.

x17 sp-mod #1 does

23MHASH 1080ti (64bit), 9MHASH 1060 6GB(32bit)