CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Bimmber]

SP,

are you willing to eat your dick on live webcam if its not faster than Enemy 1.09 ? Just be a man of your words.... !!!!

[1715082051]

1715082051

[1715082051]

1715082051

[1715082051]

1715082051

[sp_]

The sp-mod x16r private is around 10% faster than enemy 1.09

[MrsDelish]

what is the speed on 1070ti with the x16s mod, the new one?

sp-git2:
11,53 MH/s, pl 80%, core +125, mem +200


sp-git3:
12,63 MH/s, pl 80%, core +125, mem +200

[scryptr]

750ti CARDS STABLE AT AN INTENSITY OF 14--

My EVGA GTX 750ti SC cards have been running for several hours on the latest SPmod commit with no apparent problems.  They hash at 65-75kH/W, and 1.7kH/s to 2.XkH/s apiece.  I just started the CPU miner on the 6x 750ti rig to see if there is any impact.  Currently, the cards are running at 30-33W each, reported at the console via nvidia-smi.  And, for some reason, my pre-compiled windows release (SPMOD-GIT #3) does not report hash/W in the console window for my 1080ti; it is hashing at an intensity of 21 and stable overnight.  None of my cards are overclocked.  The 750ti cards are on a Lubuntu 16.04 system with CUDA ToolKit 9.1.

I have lowered the intensity on my 750ti cards  from 15 to 14 (intensity 15 performance was reported earlier).  At the higher intensity, the hash reports at the console for the individual GPUs were unreliable, and did not match submitted/accepted hash reports.  On the other hand, the max intensity setting for my 1080ti is 21.  Any higher and the miner crashes.

The total hash rate at the pool for both miners trends in the neighborhood of ~20 to 35MH/s (at times over 40MH/s).  Still too early for any big conclusions, but the Free Open Source (FOS) builds are a breath of fresh air.  Hecklers should depart this thread and go throw rotten tomatoes at the Enemy.       --scryptr

[sp_]

I pushed a 4% faster fugue to github + some pool tuning. Run with fixed difficulty on the pool.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.

[reb0rn21]

sp_ you know 1.09 was out to alfa testers before your open love 

[sp_]

sp_ you know 1.09 was out to alfa testers before your open love 

1.09 has 5 release numbers.  #5 was released yesterday after my latest commits-.

[abanamat]

I pushed a 4% faster fugue to github + some pool tuning. Run with fixed difficulty on the pool.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.

10% dev fee?! 

[Amph]

i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?

[sp_]

Pushed more speed to github (x16R, X16S)

When simd is the previous algo in the chain:

Fugue64 +26% faster
Whirlpool64 +40% faster
Hamsi64 +40% faster

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases/tag/spmod-git4

[sp_]

i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?

Depends on the sequence numbers, and how long you meassure the average rate. Testing for a few hours isn't enough. Testing x16S is more accurate, since the order is permuted and not random (every hashing algo excecuted once)

in X16S you have 16! combinations (2.092278988 E+13), in X16R 16^16 (1.8 E+18)

[agente]

i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?

Im doing 8mh with normal 1070 with this settings.. (x16r not x16s)

[sp_]

1 week ago enemy v1.08 was the fastest downloadable x16r miner.

spmod-git #4 is faster, free and opensource

here is spmod-git #3 in a 9 hour comparison between the 3 mods.

Enemy 1.09 beta 5 was compiled just after I released #3.  (He use my github code and add the speedups  to his private fee miner)

[Mr.Spider703]

Final Results of Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git3

FINAL Normalized Average Results:

#1    *                | Enemy 1.09 Beta5     | 106.27 RVN
#2    -7.62%  | Enemy 1.08                  | 98.75 RVN
#3    -9.41%   | sp-mod git3                 | 97.13 RVN

[sp_]

The test was made with spmod-git #3. I have released spmod-git #4 free and opensource

#4 is faster than enemy 1.08

To beat #9, I cannot share my code because he will only copy my work again.

[Bimmber]

Who cares about 1.08 ?!   1.09 is current version.

[sp_]

Who cares about 1.08 ?!   1.09 is current version.

In the spmod-git, I have only optimized 8/16 algos. My 16/16 algo private miner is around +10% faster than enemy 1.09 r5.

[Bimmber]

Who cares what your private miner does? It can be +999%, its not for public.

You are like a parrot stuck with same. If you want to compete, then stop making a clown of yourself. Release your best miner and show what you can do.

[sp_]

My private was released 2 months ago.. (big farms) it also includes a fast x17 miner (24 mhash 1080ti).
Still available pm for details.

[PallMall]

I pushed a 4% faster fugue to github + some pool tuning. Run with fixed  on the pool.
The enemy dude is taking my optimized code and merge it into his 1.09 exe file. (1% fee miner)
I have only shared speedups in 8 of the 16 algos. My private can beat beat enemy 1.09 r5 with 10% dev fee.

Hey
what difficulty you set?