CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Amph]

i'm getting 13.5mh with x16r on 1070ti at 60% tdp +100 core 400 mem, what are you guys getting?

Depends on the sequence numbers, and how long you meassure the average rate. Testing for a few hours isn't enough. Testing x16S is more accurate, since the order is permuted and not random (every hashing algo excecuted once)

in X16S you have 16! combinations (2.092278988 E+13), in X16R 16^16 (1.8 E+18)

still getting 14mh for some round of some algo, i know there are 16 round of algo right? some do less hash other more

the average is 66MH with 6 gpu, so 11mh, this is a 6 hours test already, btw this is with your mod sp version 3

[sp_]

btw this is with your mod sp version 3

You should upgrade to version 4

[NorbertColon]

SP_

Excellent work and thankyou.

[sp_]

still getting 14mh for some round of some algo, i know there are 16 round of algo right? some do less hash other more

yes. My X16s (permuted sequence) implementation will fluctate with the order of the algos. You can see in my latest commit that the memory access in simd is pipelined with another hashing algo. So while the gpu is waiting for the memory to be ready, it can continue to work on other work in shared mem or in registers.. (similar to the claymores dual miner)

[JackIT]

1 week ago enemy v1.08 was the fastest downloadable x16r miner.

spmod-git #4 is faster, free and opensource

here is spmod-git #3 in a 9 hour comparison between the 3 mods.

Enemy 1.09 beta 5 was compiled just after I released #3.  (He use my github code and add the speedups  to his private fee miner)

dude, what is wrong with you? 

I realize this is the internet... but please don't take the work I do and spin it into a narrative for your own benefit.

I spend a lot of time setting up and running these tests. And I run the tests as equally and fairly as possible. I don't care who wins or loses.


You can't cherry pick a round and declare victory. The fact is, that 1.08 is faster than spmod-git3, period

The reason I do three rounds, with each miner running on an instance one time, is that my test rig has a mix of 1080Ti cards, and as much as I've done to balance the instances so that they hash the same, they're not identical and some differences are to be expected.

Analyzing the weighted and normalized performance of the three instances in this test, Instance 1 and 2 performed within 1% of each other, Instance 3 performed 3-4% better than the other two.


If I had some sort of agenda and didn't care about actual valid results.. then I would have just continued Round 1 v1.0 and called it a day. Instead, I recognized that there was an issue and stopped the test. A graph like this: wouldn't be too appealing.

[cryptotamer01]

Where to find the enemy 1.09 beta 5?

[reb0rn21]

Where to find the enemy 1.09 beta 5?

DM sp_ he sell it for 0.05BTC 

[JackIT]

The fact is, that 1.08 is faster than spmod-git3, period

Why are you talking about spmod-git3. I was talking about spmod-git4

I mentioned spmod-git3 because that is the latest tested version. 

spmod-git4 might be faster than 1.08, but it also might not be faster than 1.08

You saying that it is, doesn't make it true

[sp_]

You saying that it is, doesn't make it true

Only 1 way to find out right.

[bensam1231]

You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless.

Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.

Also take a dose of your own humility.

You saying that it is, doesn't make it true

...period

[JackIT]

You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless.

Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.

Also take a dose of your own humility.

You saying that it is, doesn't make it true

...period

I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about.

Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it.

you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg36628995#msg36628995
and the first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg35471685#msg35471685

[JackIT]

You saying that it is, doesn't make it true

Only 1 way to find out right.

yep.. final version of 1.09 just dropped..

guess I'll set up testing.. any last requests before I start testing? static pool diff?

I can either start the test in about 30 mins and let it run for 9hrs... or start the test in 4hours, and let it run for 12hours. (to accommodate my sleep schedule)

[sp_]

yep.. final version of 1.09 just dropped..

I will upload a fixed version soon.

[omshree]

Is there a link for enemy miner?

[Bimmber]

Is there a link for enemy miner?

Have you heard about search function on forum here or Google ?

[omshree]

Is there a link for enemy miner?

Have you heard about search function on forum here or Google ?

Searching for a while, without success, that is why I am asking (1.09)

[Bimmber]

How have you survived on this planes so far if you can`t even use search function properly ?

[omshree]

I have no clue. Blind luck. Got it after all
https://mega.nz/#!RaBEELza!p4mtA2Ullr4V4Ocd-siNAaxZYHXmDhGQvC0ztYgTuQE

[omshree]

First test its slower than SP mod on 1080ti. Never saw this low hr on any seq. EDIT: def int was 20, with 21 better

[sp_]

I will upload a fixed version soon.

I am waiting a few days.