sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:16:19 PM Last edit: May 11, 2018, 04:30:29 PM by sp_ |
|
I heard that the 1080/1080ti enlarger is working on x16r as well with the spmod-git +500 memclock, and with the enlarger running will give you +5% more hash on the 1080ti or perhaps more ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3370685.0)
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:16:45 PM |
|
Got CUDA memory error so I couldn't even get git4A to run.
add 32gb virtual memory
|
|
|
|
CazeW
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:25:30 PM |
|
Got CUDA memory error so I couldn't even get git4A to run.
add 32gb virtual memory Have the page file on a SSD and don't have that much space left. How come it requires that much more? git3 worked fine with just 12GB.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:28:27 PM |
|
Have the page file on a SSD and don't have that much space left. How come it requires that much more? git3 worked fine with just 12GB. Does it work with one card?. Git4a is using more power and memory. (temporary allocation)
|
|
|
|
CazeW
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:32:54 PM |
|
Have the page file on a SSD and don't have that much space left. How come it requires that much more? git3 worked fine with just 12GB. Does it work with one card?. Git4a is using more power and memory. (temporary allocation) I only have one card for mining. Second card is just for Windows and gaming.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:37:19 PM |
|
I only have one card for mining. Second card is just for Windows and gaming. then 12gb should be enough. Old driver? upgrade to the latest
|
|
|
|
CazeW
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2018, 04:42:57 PM |
|
I only have one card for mining. Second card is just for Windows and gaming. then 12gb should be enough. Old driver? upgrade to the latest Yeah, I'm using 391.24 from 2018.3.20. Friend literally updated minutes ago and his machine became completely unstable so I guess there's still some instability with the 397 drivers. Might give them a try later.
|
|
|
|
cryptotamer01
Member
Offline
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
|
|
May 11, 2018, 07:29:32 PM |
|
Any c11 miner faster than alexis and anorganix phi?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 09:13:43 PM |
|
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 11, 2018, 09:45:52 PM |
|
All the yiimp based pools are cheating you. If you run with a higher difficulty like -p d=40 instead of vardiff you gain 5% but the pool doesn't find more blocks. That's why you should solomine... Live x16r stats:
|
|
|
|
JackIT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
|
May 12, 2018, 12:56:11 AM |
|
All the yiimp based pools are cheating you. If you run with a higher difficulty like -p d=40 instead of vardiff you gain 5% but the pool doesn't find more blocks. That's why you should solomine... Live x16r stats: STOP SPREADING FUD.Not reported, just means that rvnstats.info doesn't have the data necessary to populate the results. for example, private mining farms with their own pools, as well as one of the largest RVN pools F2pools, and many other small pools do not publish stats
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
cryptotamer01
Member
Offline
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
|
|
May 12, 2018, 07:48:32 AM |
|
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
Beacuse i need a fast c11 miner. i am mining stipend atm and i need a comparison of yours with the other faster ones.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2018, 09:42:02 AM |
|
+5-10% from alexis 1.0
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 12, 2018, 11:21:45 AM |
|
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
all your claims about your "fastest" private miners were beaten by Enemy. And Enemy is not the best Cuda coder )) Just imagine what speed private alexis miner has ))
|
|
|
|
cryptotamer01
Member
Offline
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
|
|
May 12, 2018, 11:40:36 AM |
|
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
all your claims about your "fastest" private miners were beaten by Enemy. And Enemy is not the best Cuda coder )) Just imagine what speed private alexis miner has )) Unfortunately enemy does not work on c11.
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
May 12, 2018, 02:51:20 PM |
|
You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless. Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams. Also take a dose of your own humility. You saying that it is, doesn't make it true
...period
I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about. Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it. you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg36628995#msg36628995and the first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg35471685#msg35471685I'd suggest you stop acting like a hypocrite, it goes a long way for credibility. Also where does that come into play in this thread when you just talk about 'rounds'? A round on a pool is the work on a certain block. I'm sorry for not reading your mind and your ambiguous terminology that you make up on the spot that's already used for other technical definitions. Or do you talk about hours in such a way to convey a certain amount of self-import regarding you turning a miner on? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool#ProportionalMaybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you actually talk about it? Jesus I'm not even going to start tearing down your test results, right off the bat you think setting intensity on three different miners is the same thing? Different miners can run at different intensities and contribute the same amount of work or some with less intensity then another running with more depending on how they're coded. That's why the intensity tuning game is still very much a part of being an experienced miner... or for the sake of testing you run them at default, whatever that is, however doesn't represent a tuned rig. A good tester would find the optimal intensity for all miners they're testing.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
JackIT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless. Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams. Also take a dose of your own humility. You saying that it is, doesn't make it true
...period
I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about. Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it. you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg36628995#msg36628995and the first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643.msg35471685#msg35471685I'd suggest you stop acting like a hypocrite, it goes a long way for credibility. Also where does that come into play in this thread when you just talk about 'rounds'? A round on a pool is the work on a certain block. I'm sorry for not reading your mind and your ambiguous terminology that you make up on the spot that's already used for other technical definitions. Or do you talk about hours in such a way to convey a certain amount of self-import regarding you turning a miner on? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool#ProportionalMaybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you actually talk about it? Jesus I'm not even going to start tearing down your test results, right off the bat you think setting intensity on three different miners is the same thing? Different miners can run at different intensities and contribute the same amount of work or some with less intensity then another running with more depending on how they're coded. That's why the intensity tuning game is still very much a part of being an experienced miner... or for the sake of testing you run them at default, whatever that is, however doesn't represent a tuned rig. A good tester would find the optimal intensity for all miners they're testing. You're obviously an idiot or troll, or both; I choose not to engage in a discussion with either.
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
Haik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2018, 05:36:45 PM |
|
Someone used gtx 980ti with spmod or 2.2.5 version and can share best overclock settings?
On what algo? x16r and phi
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 13, 2018, 01:07:32 AM |
|
Someone used gtx 980ti with spmod or 2.2.5 version and can share best overclock settings?
On what algo? x16r and phi On x16r. I start out with power limit @70%... Core 0... but you could increase it a little ... say 50+. And memory +200 works without crashing. You could get more hashrate ..but at a higher cost of electricity. Experiment ..see what gets you the highest hash per watt.
|
|
|
|
RetroShag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2018, 12:38:49 AM |
|
I receive cpu validation error on bitcore, x16s and timetravel (keccak) using spmod-git #4a on 1080ti and ryzen 1700. Other than it's faster than 2.2.5 miner.
|
|
|
|
|