Spoetnik Coin

[silvermetal]

That is not what the Blocktime is set at that causes that but the starting difficulty. With a low starting difficulty and a longer retarget time you get what is called instamining where the first blocks are mined at a much faster rate until the hashrate evens out.

FlashCoin actually had 10 second Blocktimes but anything under 30 seconds (as you mentioned with Quark) causes a lot of Orphan Blocks because of the latency between miners.

Ok thanks for the explanation.

Spoetnik would be happy , he doesn't need to lower the blocktime. He can start with a very low difficulty. It has the same effect  

But then someone else can too with more mining power.

You can control that with the availability of the amount of nodes? Seems that quark had done that in that way? Also just announce it not too big right after start, you can Edit and improve your announcement later.

@ spoetnik,  with my mobile I can't copy links. You have to wait a few more hours before I can post some proof. Thank you for your patience!

[superresistant]

 
Spoetnik Coin must take all the most scammy elements from all the scam coin.

[Spoetnik]

That is not what the Blocktime is set at that causes that but the starting difficulty. With a low starting difficulty and a longer retarget time you get what is called instamining where the first blocks are mined at a much faster rate until the hashrate evens out.

FlashCoin actually had 10 second Blocktimes but anything under 30 seconds (as you mentioned with Quark) causes a lot of Orphan Blocks because of the latency between miners.

Ok thanks for the explanation.

Spoetnik would be happy , he doesn't need to lower the blocktime. He can start with a very low difficulty. It has the same effect  

But then someone else can too with more mining power.

You can control that with the availability of the amount of nodes? Seems that quark had done that in that way? Also just announce it not too big right after start, you can Edit and improve your announcement later.

@ spoetnik,  with my mobile I can't copy links. You have to wait a few more hours before I can post some proof. Thank you for your patience!

Post anything you want ..it will be lies because i have never made a fucking coin (in any way) dumb ass LOL
and i have one fucking account.

[Spoetnik]

Spoetnik Coin must take all the most scammy elements from all the scam coin.

This sad bag holder is pissed off because i have laughed at him endlessly as he has tried to hide & forget his Memory Coin scam antics LOL
and laughed at him for how he has fallen for the dev's scams over and over.. while worshiping the guy Free Trade (MEG PTS Protshares etc dev) etc
Look at his post history and then factor in, i think Memory Coin / MEG is the most clever scam in crypto ever !
And THIS GUY was bag holder no. 1 hahahha

Better get off your mobile phones so you can come get me kids.. let's see what ya got LOL

[superresistant]

Spoetnik Coin must take all the most scammy elements from all the scam coin.

This sad bag holder is pissed off because i have laughed at him endlessly as he has tried to hide & forget his Memory Coin scam antics LOL
and laughed at him for how he has fallen for the dev's scams over and over.. while worshiping the guy Free Trade (MEG PTS Protshares etc dev) etc
Look at his post history and then factor in, i think Memory Coin / MEG is the most clever scam in crypto ever !
And THIS GUY was bag holder no. 1 hahahha
Better get off your mobile phones so you can come get me kids.. let's see what ya got LOL

Bagholder ? I never had more than 0.5 BTC of Memorycoin.
I was hopping mining Memorycoin could fund my new computer but it turned on fire.
It is still in the corner of my room.
I bought a good laptop instead.


My dead computer 

[Crestington]

@Spoetnik

In terms of adoption I don't see how it could fail, what are you thinking in terms of algo's, rewards, etc.

Here's a little logo pic as well

[rugrats]

@Spoetnik

In terms of adoption I don't see how it could fail, what are you thinking in terms of algo's, rewards, etc.

Here's a little logo pic as well

Love it, Cresty!  

Edit: The algo should be X25 (X17 + eight more NIST comp first round algos - arirang, chi, crunch, fsb, lane, lesamnta, md6 and sandstorm)

[silvermetal]

It'll be a great excuse for when Spoetnik "Breaks Bad" and runs off with everyones funds:
Sorry, my dog ate the blockchain....

Don't think any dodgy coin dev/exchange operator/general scammer has ever tried that one before.

AHHAHA that is fucking hilarious and we know it's gonna happen now.. i bet some guy is planning it as we speak LOL

edit:
@silvermetal
i can assure you i am dead serious when i have not made a coin.. i don't know how many times i have to say this lol
and no i never had anyone make one for me in and stretch way or fashion in the slightest !

digitalindustry.. may or may not have, i don't know.. i can not keep tabs on what he does.. ask him

all i know about links to him and Quark is i was in on Quark mining it like everyone else around here after maybe a week or two after launch
and spend time working on various miners for it trying to improve miner performance and running some experiments etc
and maybe the design of it is bad but guys.. hindsight is 20/20 and we have learned a lot on how to make better coins since then (it was a long time ago)

2 weeks after launch?
As usual I have no idea what you and digitalindustry are discussing about but look who is there after 13 hours in the Quark thread.
And you post there if you didn't mine it already for 13 hours? don't make me laugh.
Also notice that you post 30 seconds after your friend digitalindustry. Coincidence?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777617#msg2777617

silvermetal i have never seen a shred of proof the guy that made Quark coin was linked to Hazard or Shake either.. proof ?

No problem, here you are: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3727460#msg3727460

Why is somebody who is creating hundreds of coins, writing an article about a coin which he doesn't create or is involved with?
It is the same as Pepsi making an advertisement for Coca Cola (to speak in Quark terms). Is that logical?
For me the article is enough evidence that Hazard was involved in the creation of Quark.

Also take the following into account:
- Hazard doesn't want to be correlated with (the ) crap coins he created for others(see the post here, hazard created for example Nibbles but di didn't want to correlate him with Nibbles and other (crap) coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.msg2336810#msg2336810)
- Hazard has a clone coin service. Quark is a clone of Sifcoin, created one month before Quark.
- Hazard likes to create coins and instamine or premine them (see kopimicoin). His whole scamming tactics was described in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.0
As explained few posts before by "crestington" (if you paid attention) Quark is instamined


Shake is a different story. He explained to me his role in Quark. I guess you might have read the same e-mail from Shake as I have, where he explained his role.

you know if it's not too much too ask can you post some proof to back up your wild claims ?

Sure sure Spoetnik may make wild claims. I have to present proof. Special for you above is what you asked for.

because it gets tiring having guys Troll me to death claiming i have 20 accounts and 20 coins when i have ONE !
believe me or don't what do want me to do here ? is there some way i can prove it to you all ?

Nope you can't, because you would only lie more. (just the same as digitalindustry does).

[Crestington]

It'll be a great excuse for when Spoetnik "Breaks Bad" and runs off with everyones funds:
Sorry, my dog ate the blockchain....

Don't think any dodgy coin dev/exchange operator/general scammer has ever tried that one before.

AHHAHA that is fucking hilarious and we know it's gonna happen now.. i bet some guy is planning it as we speak LOL

edit:
@silvermetal
i can assure you i am dead serious when i have not made a coin.. i don't know how many times i have to say this lol
and no i never had anyone make one for me in and stretch way or fashion in the slightest !

digitalindustry.. may or may not have, i don't know.. i can not keep tabs on what he does.. ask him

all i know about links to him and Quark is i was in on Quark mining it like everyone else around here after maybe a week or two after launch
and spend time working on various miners for it trying to improve miner performance and running some experiments etc
and maybe the design of it is bad but guys.. hindsight is 20/20 and we have learned a lot on how to make better coins since then (it was a long time ago)

2 weeks after launch?
As usual I have no idea what you and digitalindustry are discussing about but look who is there after 13 hours in the Quark thread.
And you post there if you didn't mine it already for 13 hours? don't make me laugh.
Also notice that you post 30 seconds after your friend digitalindustry. Coincidence?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777617#msg2777617

silvermetal i have never seen a shred of proof the guy that made Quark coin was linked to Hazard or Shake either.. proof ?

No problem, here you are: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3727460#msg3727460

Why is somebody who is creating hundreds of coins, writing an article about a coin which he doesn't create or is involved with?
It is the same as Pepsi making an advertisement for Coca Cola (to speak in Quark terms). Is that logical?
For me the article is enough evidence that Hazard was involved in the creation of Quark.

Also take the following into account:
- Hazard doesn't want to be correlated with (the ) crap coins he created for others(see the post here, hazard created for example Nibbles but di didn't want to correlate him with Nibbles and other (crap) coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.msg2336810#msg2336810)
- Hazard has a clone coin service. Quark is a clone of Sifcoin, created one month before Quark.
- Hazard likes to create coins and instamine or premine them (see kopimicoin). His whole scamming tactics was described in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.0
As explained few posts before by "crestington" (if you paid attention) Quark is instamined


Shake is a different story. He explained to me his role in Quark. I guess you might have read the same e-mail from Shake as I have, where he explained his role.

you know if it's not too much too ask can you post some proof to back up your wild claims ?

Sure sure Spoetnik may make wild claims. I have to present proof. Special for you above is what you asked for.

because it gets tiring having guys Troll me to death claiming i have 20 accounts and 20 coins when i have ONE !
believe me or don't what do want me to do here ? is there some way i can prove it to you all ?

Nope you can't, because you would only lie more. (just the same as digitalindustry does).

Quark was known to be instamined for the first few Blocks (as you mentioned) but I don't see how this is relevant since it was mined by a lot of people, it just means that the first number of Blocks had a bit of an advantage. Quark is still around and has it's own set of forums so yeah it was probably a bit shady but then I did hear all the promoting of Quark with Bill Still and everything yet my rationale was that Quark was one of a bunch of new Coins but you have a lot of new coins being created so unless everyone unanimously adopted a currency named Quark, you always need people buying it.

Investment 101 is that you do not want to be buying on the peak of a pump, some people lost and some people won. If you think there was a lot of wrongdoing, you could start a thread in the scam accusation section with all relevant proof but I think it's too long ago for you to ever get the evidence you are looking for.

[e-coinomist]

Love it, Cresty!  

Edit: The algo should be X25 (X17 + eight more NIST comp first round algos - arirang, chi, crunch, fsb, lane, lesamnta, md6 and sandstorm)

Add LOL and FUD, since most coins are fuelled from those algos.

AND get the FSB, Federal'naya sluzhba bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii outa there asap!

[silvermetal]

It'll be a great excuse for when Spoetnik "Breaks Bad" and runs off with everyones funds:
Sorry, my dog ate the blockchain....

Don't think any dodgy coin dev/exchange operator/general scammer has ever tried that one before.

AHHAHA that is fucking hilarious and we know it's gonna happen now.. i bet some guy is planning it as we speak LOL

edit:
@silvermetal
i can assure you i am dead serious when i have not made a coin.. i don't know how many times i have to say this lol
and no i never had anyone make one for me in and stretch way or fashion in the slightest !

digitalindustry.. may or may not have, i don't know.. i can not keep tabs on what he does.. ask him

all i know about links to him and Quark is i was in on Quark mining it like everyone else around here after maybe a week or two after launch
and spend time working on various miners for it trying to improve miner performance and running some experiments etc
and maybe the design of it is bad but guys.. hindsight is 20/20 and we have learned a lot on how to make better coins since then (it was a long time ago)

2 weeks after launch?
As usual I have no idea what you and digitalindustry are discussing about but look who is there after 13 hours in the Quark thread.
And you post there if you didn't mine it already for 13 hours? don't make me laugh.
Also notice that you post 30 seconds after your friend digitalindustry. Coincidence?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777617#msg2777617

silvermetal i have never seen a shred of proof the guy that made Quark coin was linked to Hazard or Shake either.. proof ?

No problem, here you are: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3727460#msg3727460

Why is somebody who is creating hundreds of coins, writing an article about a coin which he doesn't create or is involved with?
It is the same as Pepsi making an advertisement for Coca Cola (to speak in Quark terms). Is that logical?
For me the article is enough evidence that Hazard was involved in the creation of Quark.

Also take the following into account:
- Hazard doesn't want to be correlated with (the ) crap coins he created for others(see the post here, hazard created for example Nibbles but di didn't want to correlate him with Nibbles and other (crap) coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.msg2336810#msg2336810)
- Hazard has a clone coin service. Quark is a clone of Sifcoin, created one month before Quark.
- Hazard likes to create coins and instamine or premine them (see kopimicoin). His whole scamming tactics was described in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.0
As explained few posts before by "crestington" (if you paid attention) Quark is instamined


Shake is a different story. He explained to me his role in Quark. I guess you might have read the same e-mail from Shake as I have, where he explained his role.

you know if it's not too much too ask can you post some proof to back up your wild claims ?

Sure sure Spoetnik may make wild claims. I have to present proof. Special for you above is what you asked for.

because it gets tiring having guys Troll me to death claiming i have 20 accounts and 20 coins when i have ONE !
believe me or don't what do want me to do here ? is there some way i can prove it to you all ?

Nope you can't, because you would only lie more. (just the same as digitalindustry does).

Quark was known to be instamined for the first few Blocks (as you mentioned) but I don't see how this is relevant since it was mined by a lot of people, it just means that the first number of Blocks had a bit of an advantage. Quark is still around and has it's own set of forums so yeah it was probably a bit shady but then I did hear all the promoting of Quark with Bill Still and everything yet my rationale was that Quark was one of a bunch of new Coins but you have a lot of new coins being created so unless everyone unanimously adopted a currency named Quark, you always need people buying it.

Investment 101 is that you do not want to be buying on the peak of a pump, some people lost and some people won. If you think there was a lot of wrongdoing, you could start a thread in the scam accusation section with all relevant proof but I think it's too long ago for you to ever get the evidence you are looking for.

Why post it in the scam accusstion section if spoetnik demands providing proof here? Besides I provide Spoetnik free tips for his spoetnikcoin.

[Spoetnik]

The icon is awesome thanks for taking the time to do that i Love it

@silvermetal
hmm what can say you got me..  naaaaaaawt LOL

i don't know who you are or where you came from or why you all of a sudden popped up from out of no where to slander the shit out of me.
but your wrong.. dead wrong 100%
and i am writing this to tell you..

1 = i am writing a faaaaar bigger reply shooting your ass down in flames point by point.

2 = that i really want to just call you a massive idiot BUT i am trying not too because i think you believe what your saying.. why i don't know.

so let me try and say as nicely as i can.. your wrong ! simple as that.. your off base on this entirely 100%
and you can believe me or not but you have no smoking gun and you have been grasping at straws big time with me and digitalindustry and now Hazard/Shake too.

so i suggest you take up your issues with digitalindustry/kolin i don't know what he does, you have to ask him and that goes for Hazard/Shake too.
i can only go by what those two other guys told me and both of them have never said anything of the sort that you are implying here period.

I don't care what people think eh.. if i wanted to say i mined Quark on day one i would.. but i didn't ...so i am not going admit something i didn't do ever !

I DO know some guys have a massive hard on for Trolling digitalindustry non stop and i have stuck up for him which means i am him to some of you.
he's a smart guy and he deserves to be backed up when NXT devs and/or Cheerleaders have come after him.
So it's fishy both of us have gotten into it a lot before with NXT cheerleaders then you show up.. a rather large coincidence.

I'd almost guarantee you are behind coins and are trying to discredit me out of spite.. because some of us bashed your shit you posted.
or maybe you seen me talking and just don't like me and wanna fuck me over, i don't know.

i do not remember talking to you before silvermetal and i have no idea who the hell you are.
but i have criticized a lot of coins and gotten childish trolling for it 24/7
so i am left grasping at straws trying to figure out who you are or why i should care what you think.

If making up bold face lies you know are 100% false is what makes you feel like a big a shot on the internet then go hard.. i just think it's sad and pathetic.
And i have sweet fuck all to hide.. if i made a coin i would say so.. if i mined Quark on day one i would just say so.. why would i bother hiding it ?
don't you all think i'd just spit it out and argue about it or something ? LOL

[Spoetnik]

It'll be a great excuse for when Spoetnik "Breaks Bad" and runs off with everyones funds:
Sorry, my dog ate the blockchain....

Don't think any dodgy coin dev/exchange operator/general scammer has ever tried that one before.

AHHAHA that is fucking hilarious and we know it's gonna happen now.. i bet some guy is planning it as we speak LOL

edit:
@silvermetal
i can assure you i am dead serious when i have not made a coin.. i don't know how many times i have to say this lol
and no i never had anyone make one for me in and stretch way or fashion in the slightest !

digitalindustry.. may or may not have, i don't know.. i can not keep tabs on what he does.. ask him

all i know about links to him and Quark is i was in on Quark mining it like everyone else around here after maybe a week or two after launch
and spend time working on various miners for it trying to improve miner performance and running some experiments etc
and maybe the design of it is bad but guys.. hindsight is 20/20 and we have learned a lot on how to make better coins since then (it was a long time ago)

2 weeks after launch?
As usual I have no idea what you and digitalindustry are discussing about but look who is there after 13 hours in the Quark thread.
And you post there if you didn't mine it already for 13 hours? don't make me laugh.
Also notice that you post 30 seconds after your friend digitalindustry. Coincidence?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg2777617#msg2777617

silvermetal i have never seen a shred of proof the guy that made Quark coin was linked to Hazard or Shake either.. proof ?

No problem, here you are: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3727460#msg3727460

Why is somebody who is creating hundreds of coins, writing an article about a coin which he doesn't create or is involved with?
It is the same as Pepsi making an advertisement for Coca Cola (to speak in Quark terms). Is that logical?
For me the article is enough evidence that Hazard was involved in the creation of Quark.

Also take the following into account:
- Hazard doesn't want to be correlated with (the ) crap coins he created for others(see the post here, hazard created for example Nibbles but di didn't want to correlate him with Nibbles and other (crap) coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.msg2336810#msg2336810)
- Hazard has a clone coin service. Quark is a clone of Sifcoin, created one month before Quark.
- Hazard likes to create coins and instamine or premine them (see kopimicoin). His whole scamming tactics was described in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222216.0
As explained few posts before by "crestington" (if you paid attention) Quark is instamined


Shake is a different story. He explained to me his role in Quark. I guess you might have read the same e-mail from Shake as I have, where he explained his role.

you know if it's not too much too ask can you post some proof to back up your wild claims ?

Sure sure Spoetnik may make wild claims. I have to present proof. Special for you above is what you asked for.

because it gets tiring having guys Troll me to death claiming i have 20 accounts and 20 coins when i have ONE !
believe me or don't what do want me to do here ? is there some way i can prove it to you all ?

Nope you can't, because you would only lie more. (just the same as digitalindustry does).

so 2 weeks after launch ?
YES = my best guess is, it was prob closer to 3 weeks to be honest.
I know because i remember clearly kicking myself in the ass ignoring the ANN topic here on Quark for sooo long.
And believe it or not i don't dive on shit and start mining coins like a lot of guys.. I watch first and have always been like that.

that link you quoted was digitalindustry having a jab at Quark sort of, mentioning a new trend.. CPU mined coins !
and all i said is i agreed.. so your wrong.. and hell yeah i stand behind what i said.

I was mining Quark early on but still too late.. i was getting fuck all when i started trying on some P2Pool(s)
and by that time my Intel Core2Duo e7500 was not exactly making me rich LOL

I ended up soon having to drop it entirely because i could not get a single share accepted on the pool's.
i shit you guys not that my miner would run with 0 shares accepted and most of the coins i got
were from guys in Cryptsy chat that felt sorry for me and had given me some.

Right away guys were starting to rent servers to mine Quark and i was not nor have i ever rented a server of any kind.
which meant i was squeezed out of the coin (hash speed wise) and when SRC / Securecoin came along i made sure to try and get in on that, on day one !
SRC was the first clone of Quark's algo and mimic'd Bitcoins block stats and reward etc with no premine..
And again running just my Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 CPU mining was not making me rich LOL

Then, we have your proof Hazard is behind Quark LOL
And it's funny you linked to that topic and not the link he posted on it to his blog etc..
which says = http://cryptolife.net/quark-is-it-worth-buying <- NOV 26th 2013 ..wwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay late on Quark by the way
And i think the link is self explanatory
I read what he said and all it says is he bought some Quark coins..
here you guys read it..

Hazard November 26, 2013 Uncategorized 11 Comments

I’ve always had somewhat of a soft spot for Quark. It was a quirky little CPU mined coin that launched with a very unique hashing mechanism, yet faded into obscurity in part due to how horribly it was managed. And yet here I am writing an article about it… Why, you ask?

Quark is up over 2000% during the past week. A lot of other coins have seen significant growth during this period as well, but most of those coins (SRC, PTS, to name a few) owe their growth to being listed on the chinese based BTC38 exchange, and the resulting influx of yuan. Quark is different in that it’s growth has been spurred by non-chinese sources.

So what’s been driving quark’s growth if not the chinese? Supposedly Bill Still (who I’ve admittedly never heard of, yet apparently has somewhat of a following behind him) has expressed interest in it. This could mean good things to come, if the hype is to be believed.

With rumors flying around that BTC38 is looking into adding quark, there’s still room for even more explosive growth. The chinese have altcoin fever right now, and are indiscriminately pumping money into any coin they can get their hands on. With the relative low cost per unit of quark, it could see some impressive growth should it get listed.

All things considered, I believe it to be worthwhile to hold a speculative stake of this coin at the moment. The coming days should be very interesting. You can buy Quark on Cryptsy

If you enjoyed this article, also check out my latest piece on StableCoin, another coin that I believe will experience similar growth.

So notice he said that, NOV 26, 2013 and Quark came out on July 21, 2013
So read that and tell me does it sound like he made the coin ? And if he really did then why did he wait 4 whole months to say it's an interesting buy ?
Quark ANN = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.0
You said, "Why is somebody who is creating hundreds of coins, writing an article about a coin which he doesn't create or is involved with?"
Why ? he prob wanted to make some money /case closed LOL

and you said.."- Hazard has a clone coin service. Quark is a clone of Sifcoin, created one month before Quark."
SIF coin ANN topic RE-Posted by an English guy from an orig RUS ANN topic..
[ANN][SIC] Sifcoin - inflation fork - June 22, 2013, 04:40:27 PM - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240894.0

And here is the RUS ANN topic.. (posted same day as above)
Sifcoin (Инфляциoный фopк). Cтapт 2013-06-23. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240884.0

In all honesty i never looked at SIF coin until now.. they do seem to have a similar algo system but i don't see how that pertains to anything.
Nobody paid ANY attention to SIF coin back then eh.

and Quark is instamined ? you said ?
funny you say that.. same shit i have heard from NXT attacking assholes who bashed me and Kolin/digitalindustry and Quark non stop with lies.
It was no more flash mined then any coin back then and the more popular the worse they were hit.. especially if they were CPU coins like Prime coin !

you said then..
"Shake is a different story. He explained to me his role in Quark. I guess you might have read the same e-mail from Shake as I have, where he explained his role."
I have never gotten an email or even a PM here from Shakezulu that i remember and if you did then why didn't you post it ?
what did it say ?
"he explained his role" ?? oh he did huh ? i don't believe you.. i am confident your lying LOL

ALL of the crap you posted is retarded gibberish and you know what ? i changed my mind your a massive fucking Idiot LOL
And the more i look at things the clearer it's become your a fucking little NXT bitch trying to trash on us because we bad mouthed NXT
The fact you have this massive big ass agenda to defame Quark and kolin AKA: digital industry in relation to him attacking NXT seals the deal !
Actually i have YOU pegged.. your an asshole and your starting with me because i backed up kolin on his many topics/comments on NXT.
Other wise you would not have spent 75% of your response bashing him and that coin.

You finished by saying..
"Nope you can't, because you would only lie more. (just the same as digitalindustry does)."

Wrong, i have not lied about anything and if you have a problem with that other guy take it up with him..
You have no proof i made a coin and you failed at proving Shakezulu / Hazard or even digitalindustry made Quark.. you accusations are laughable.

try again..

[CryptoCarmen]

@Spoetnik

In terms of adoption I don't see how it could fail, what are you thinking in terms of algo's, rewards, etc.

Here's a little logo pic as well

It will be only legitimate coin!

[silvermetal]

Wow did I hit a sensitive nerve somewhere?
What a swearing and so much defence...
And only after posting some tips for your spoetnik coin....

Why is Quark so sensitive for you as you had only painful experiences with it?

So much questions and text to comment on...let me find some back between the swearing....

he bought some Quark coins..

How do you know Hazard bought Quark? I can't find that back in the article?...or no that is your interpretation....well my interpretation is that he mined it. But let's stick to the facts. We both agree he held a significant amount of Quark at that time, otherwise he had not written that article.

So read that and tell me does it sound like he made the coin ? And if he really did then why did he wait 4 whole months to say it's an interesting buy ?

As I explained before...Hazard don't want to be correlated with the coins he made...
He, and digitalindustry waited four months with marketing because of the model of Quark.
After four months the Quark reward dropped to maybe 8 or 4 Quark every 30 seconds? (at launch it was 2048 Quark every 30 seconds) and miners could not significant influence the price of Quark anymore by dumping Quark at exchanges.
If he marketed the coin earlier then it could never have the same pump effect as it had in November 2013.

and Quark is instamined ? you said ?

Again, you didn't pay attention. I didn't say that; I quoted "crestington" who said it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=833442.msg9342616#msg9342616

I have never gotten an email or even a PM here from Shakezulu that i remember and if you did then why didn't you post it ?
what did it say ?
"he explained his role" ?? oh he did huh ? i don't believe you.. i am confident your lying LOL

Oh I thought digitalindustry shared everything with you . Anyway Shake did this for Quark (and played a role in creation of b9 coin):

https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark/commit/20f503b6d45fb8359d2a656982907688f6b51d4f

He didn't play an active part in creation of Quark.


Hm further I see only more swearing, abusing, and more words better not to quote.

[Spoetnik]

Wow did I hit a sensitive nerve somewhere?

No your just an idiot hurling a million nasty false accusations for some odd reason and don't flatter yourself thinking you got a rise out of me.

i never made a coin so your wrong now fuck off brat.

if you have a problem with Hazard or digitalindustry or Quark coin i suggest you take it with them now FUCK off kid.

can't handle the swearing cocky little shit ? too fucking bad.. eat a bag of dicks..

[Ghepetto]

Headeduptheriverinaboatwithnopaddle


Tra la la la la-la la laaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[silvermetal]

can't handle the swearing cocky little shit ? too fucking bad.. eat a bag of dicks..

No problem with the swearing, but you use the same tactics as your friend. The swearing confuses people and brings people off track. Not sure why you use that tactic now? also I notice a lot of self reflections in your post....

Anyhow all the best with your spoetnikcoin. And I changed my opinion to NO

[bee7]

can't handle the swearing cocky little shit ? too fucking bad.. eat a bag of dicks..

No problem with the swearing, but you use the same tactics as your friend. The swearing confuses people and brings people off track. Not sure why you use that tactic now? also I notice a lot of self reflections in your post....

Anyhow all the best with your spoetnikcoin. And I changed my opinion to NO

I am curious, do you take this poll seriously?

[Jeff8247]

Would I buy spoetnik coin if it existed? Nope